Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McVeigh Defense Investigator Questions Senator's Probe
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 10/30/02 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 10/30/2002 3:01:42 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: honway
In #34: Anybody want to take a guess at who the "defense investigator" in question was?

...and, finally...

In #40: It appears that the famous "X" in the Stephen Jones book is Roger Charles.

Honway, you're my kinda guy! You raise a question in your own mind, and then keep digging until you come up with a reasonable answer.

I didn't suspect Cate McCauley, because, AFAIK, she only worked with S. Jones' successors -- on McVeigh's appeal (after he was sentenced, of course...).

However, I hadn't known that Roger Charles apparently went directly from the Jones team to OKBIC. And, no, I never met the man... (All my OKBIC work was done -- via the internet -- from MA, and the only time I ever visited OKC was after R. Charles' departure from the OKBIC team.)

41 posted on 11/01/2002 9:30:13 AM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: honway
I never realized that Admiral Boorda was Jewish.

http://www.jewishsailors.com/profiles/boorda/
42 posted on 11/01/2002 10:25:48 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Thanks for the link. There is some inaccurate information in the bio.

uncovered evidence that he wore two unearned combat ribbons for his participation in Vietnam.

There was never a question about the fact that Admiral Boorda earned all his ribbons. Roger Carles and Hackworth maintained that Admiral Boorda did not earn the "V" device on two ribbons because his service was on a U.S. warship conducting combat operations in unfriendly waters off the coast of Vietnam.

The Chief of Naval Operations during the time of service in question, Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, maintains Admiral Boorda did earn the "V" devices. I'll take the Admiral's word over these two hacks any day. In addition, suggesting that sailors serving their country on a warship conducting combat operations in unfriendly waters did not demonstrate sufficient valor to earn the "V" device does not hold water, in my opinion.

43 posted on 11/01/2002 10:59:19 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Thank you for your important contributions to the OKC bombing investigation, past and present.

Your first hand experiences are invaluable for those of us trying to make sense of these new developments.

44 posted on 11/01/2002 11:03:11 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What kind of legal defense goes out of its way to prove it's client's guilt??????
45 posted on 11/01/2002 11:04:45 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA; Fred Mertz; PhilDragoo; citizenK
Thanks, Fred, for flagging me and asking for my input. PhilDragoo’s comment #15 is exactly what happened in this article by Jeff Johnson. Phil says, “The article is lazy journalism, putting a microphone in front of a homeless person at a bus stop who says she’s Catherine the Great.” I just loved that comment from Phil. This Internet news service has admitted they don’t have the funds or time to investigate McCauley and her claims. But they are still going to let McCauley have her say. That is absolutely ridiculous. Jayna had been vetted for months by Wall Street Journal, L.A. Weekly, and other publications. This organization did not vet McCauley at all. They did not seem to even do a cursory search on the Internet, because that would have been very interesting and revealing.

Jayna has given a rebuttal to CNSNEWS on every point that McCauley has made. They may allow a portion of Jayna’s rebuttals to get some exposure. We’ll see.

CitizenK, you also had some very insightful observations!

I do not know a lot about McCauley. I became suspicious of McCauley right after she came to Oklahoma City. A relative of mine lives in Colorado and heads up an organization that puts out a newspaper. This paper had investigated a disinformation agent and my cousin was very concerned that McCauley fit the profile. She had heard Charles Key and McCauley when they came to Colorado. She had talked to McCauley and asked a few questions about the Middle Eastern connection and how McCauley ended up coming to Oklahoma City. McCauley’s answers raised a lot of red flags to my relative. So, I became very wary of McCauley. One thing that always caused us to take notice of people is how did they stand on the Middle Eastern connection to Oklahoma City. If they would dismiss it out of hand without even looking at the information, that raised a red flag. The time I talked to McCauley in person, I asked her about the Middle Eastern connection. She seemed to be dismissive about the whole thing to me.

An Internet search showed an interview that McCauley did for a Boston radio station called the connection. Twenty-eight minutes into the program she says the following, “Even after the inspector general’s report an FBI agent went before an Oklahoma County Grand Jury and continued to give wrong information.” She would be referring to John Hersley because he was the agent dispatched to go before the Grand Jury. Boy, she has sure changed her tune now. I have mine own ideas on why she would make this comment back in 2001 but now seems to change her tune. At this point, I am trying to be cautious about what I say publicly about McCauley. Jayna is quite capable of defending herself and hopefully, her answers will be released today or at least by Monday.

An Associated Press story that was picked up by Southcoast Today quotes McCauley as saying. “Cate McCauley, who worked on the McVeigh defense team and also witnessed the execution, then told (Bill) McVeigh: 'I’d like to say you have a very brave son, and he’s free.'”

I would never use the word brave to describe a mass murderer.

In this thread, several investigators have been mentioned, J.D. Cash, Roger Charles, Cate McCauley who all seemed to work together according to some of the comments made on this thread. I personally would not work with any of them. I never felt that any of their motives were to advance the truth. Honway, you seem to think that Roger Charles was the one that burned Stephen Jones. I had always wondered if it was J.D. Cash.

The Freepers have been great to encourage Jayna! She is very appreciative!

My grandson is waking up so I better post this and take care of him. Someone that knows how to post this to the entire bump list, feel free to do so.
46 posted on 11/01/2002 11:09:21 AM PST by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew
Honway, you seem to think that Roger Charles was the one that burned Stephen Jones. I had always wondered if it was J.D. Cash

I believe at his core, Stephen Jones is a man of integrity. In his book "Others Unknown"p.299,300, Jones describes a defense investigator's interaction with J.D. Cash in publicizing the "McVeigh confession was a hoax" story. The way I read it, Jones seems to be clear in his book that J.D. Cash and "X" are two different people. If they are the same person, IMO Jones deceived his readers and I do not believe Jones would do that.

47 posted on 11/01/2002 11:33:10 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: honway
Your right on that, Honway. I had forgotten about that comment that he had made in his book. It has been a long time since I had revisited the J.D. Cash episode.
48 posted on 11/01/2002 12:01:17 PM PST by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew; All
http://www.s-t.com/daily/06-01/06-12-01/a01ho013.htm

Bill McVeigh says he's "all right" after execution

Cate McCauley, who worked on the McVeigh defense team and also witnessed the execution, then told McVeigh: "I'd like to say you have a very brave son, and he's free."

-------------------------------------------------

Tim McVeigh participated in the murder of 168 innocent people, including children.
I think Ms. McCauley owes us an explanation of what the word "brave" means as well as the word "free" in this context.

49 posted on 11/01/2002 12:04:11 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew
appreciate your input here.
50 posted on 11/01/2002 1:40:13 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: honway; TXnMA; Fred Mertz
seems roger charles was about as much an investigator as falmy malik was a medical examiner.
51 posted on 11/01/2002 1:41:56 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thinden
Roger Charles is a USNA graduate, while Admiral Boorda was commissioned through OCS.
52 posted on 11/01/2002 1:59:42 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; Gary Aldrich; amom; archy; aristeides; anymouse; AtticusX; backhoe; baseballmom; ...
Big

Thank you! BTTT

for a great Must-Read comment by Nancie Drew!
53 posted on 11/01/2002 2:00:45 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thinden
seems roger charles was about as much an investigator as falmy malik was a medical examiner.

You don't want to get me going on Fahmy Malik and the Saline County mess!

I'm working (from time-to-time) on a lengthy story of how I changed from non-political to deeply involved in the OKC Bombing investigation. Suffice it to say that all it began when I visited Benton, Arkansas, and my host said, "Right over yonder are some train tracks...".

God bless Linda Ives and Jean Duffey!!!

54 posted on 11/01/2002 2:10:28 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: honway; TXnMA; Nancie Drew
Regarding Alex McCauley, I could not enter the website found on a search on him:

The Man Who Didn't Exist - Oklahoma City Bombing and The Politics ...
... David Hall of KPOC-TV uncovered information that McVeigh had met with local ATF agent Alex McCauley in a McDonalds the night before the bombing. ...
www.mindprism.com/__ocbpt/chpt2b.html
- 101k - Cached - Similar pages

You are not authorized to view this page
You might not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials you supplied.
If you believe you should be able to view this directory or page, please try to contact the Web site by using any e-mail address or phone number that may be listed on the www.mindprism.com home page.

55 posted on 11/01/2002 4:27:09 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew; honway; TXnMA
Check this out:

Topic: OKC Bombing
We need your help

OKBIC
08/14/98 Cate McCauley OKBIC Executive Director

We Need Your Help

Many of our loyal readers have written or called to ask how they can help us. Here's the perfect way to assist the OK Bombing Investigation.

As you may know, the OKBIC is preparing to take this case to Congress. Members of our committee were in Washington DC this past May lobbying members of Congress for public hearings. There are two areas of concern we plan to pursue: 1) federal building safety and; 2) the Judiciary Committee, which oversees the U.S. Justice Dept.

We have a Petition for Congress that needs as many signatures as possible, from every corner of our country (But we also welcome our foreign readers to join in). We need to demonstrate that the American people do care about what happened here in Oklahoma City. So many lingering unanswered questions is simply unacceptable.

Please print out a copy of our Petition and send it to your friends and family. If we receive even one page of signatures each from the thousands of readers who check into this site each month, it will help us tremendously.

Once you have the Petitions signed, mail them back to us and we will include them in our Congressional Report.

Need some inspiration? Sometimes others say it best. Please read our editorials on ``Why We Should Care?" ``Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's Farewell & Warning to America" and ``It's All Too Familiar."

And finally, I wish to extend my gratitude to everyone for your kind words of support. You really do help us by letting us know you care. There are many victims' families here who are also touched by your concern. We all appreciate anything you can do to support our efforts.

Sincerely,
Cate McCauley
OKBIC Executive Director

The above appears in the Free Republic archive at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a529277.htm

"Help us give this coverup an appearance of broad support."

56 posted on 11/01/2002 4:39:32 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: citizenK; Alamo-Girl; Gary Aldrich; amom; archy; aristeides; anymouse; AtticusX; backhoe; ...
Anyone know if this Cate McCauley is credible?

Is anyone more familiar with this Cate McCauley's involvement in the case? Unfortunately I don't have a lot of time to track some of this stuff down, but my cursory search makes me wonder about her credibility. Who is more credible here, McCauley or Davis?


I promised to share my personal experience with Cate McCauley while she was OKBIC's Executive Director. Here's my take (as viewed fom a couple of thousand miles away in Massachusetts):


Cate McCauley is still a mystery to me (and to Charles Key, as well). When Cate was OKBIC Executive director, she and I hit it off quite well. In fact.I'd say we developed a cordial and enjoyable working relationship (via e-mail and phone). Cate has [had?] a devastating, sarcastic sense of humor, and we shared many an e-mail laugh. (Especially about the antics of the "Fumbling Bums of Infamy".) I felt we had developed a warm friendship to complement our excellent working relationship. (After she had dinner with my wife and me on one of her trips home to Providence, she gave us both big hugs...)

But, then she developed a mail correspondence with Timothy McVeigh, and began "using her womanly wiles" (her term) on him. (She laughingly referred to him as "just another horny 20-year-old kid".) Then, shortly after she began corresponding with Mc Veigh, she began refering to him as, "Timmy". Soon it was, "Timmy this..." and "Timmy says..." -- and, then she suddenly stopped answering my e-mails.

That was along about the time of the OKC tornado, so, after I got no response to several e-mails showing increasing levels of concern for her welfare, I finally called her on the phone. She was anything but her usual, bubbly self, and she let me know she was OK -- and that she didn't need anyone to be concerned for her well-being, thank you. (I thought that, perhaps, she had misinterpreted my grandfatherly concern -- so I backed off on communication, as well...)

A few weeks later, Charles flew me to OKC to measure the track width on the Caterpillar the workers parked in the crater, (for use as a photogrammetry scale), to meet the Committee members, and to see the MFB site. Cate was hardly civil -- and she barely condescended to shake my hand. Then I noticed she was treating everyone else -- even Charles -- the same way.

One experience of that trip still astounds me: Charles and I were in the temporary Bombing Museum, going over the full set of drawings of the Murrah Building, when Cate walked in the door. She stopped and glared at us, as if to say, "What are you two men doing here in my private data repository?" And I swear i thought she was going to turn right around and leave -- which she soon did. Most odd behavior from one who was supposedly a committed member of our team...

Shortly thereafter, she resigned.

Cate completely "flipped"! Her personality changed, her allegiances reversed, and she bailed out.

She abandoned OKBIC just as pressure was building for us to get the Final Report published -- leaving OKBIC demoralized and with nothing but a mass of (somewhat organized) information from which to construct a report. IMHO, it was only Charles Key's personal integrity and hunger for the truth that kept the whole project from collapsing... (I was fortunate: I had held all my information and the drafts of my analytical chapter "close to my chest" -- and distributed over several electronic storage media locations.)

OKBIC still has much of McCauley's work product (writing) from when she was the primary author of the Report. Believe me, her words then are diametrically opposed to her words now (in the above article). [See Phil Dragoo's #56 for an excellent "before" example...]

Next thing I heard of Cate, she was working for McVeigh's defense team, and denouncing us as a bunch of conspiracy wackos. I understand that she was even one of the (six?) people McVeigh asked to be personal witnesses of his execution -- but I don't know whether she attended or not... (NOTE: based on FR inputs, I now understand that she did attend as McVeigh's invited witness.)

Very, very strange -- not only a complete reversal of beliefs and allegiance, but an obvious radical shift in personality. Quite a shame, really, because she was a bright, witty, charming, conservative professional -- before McVeigh. To be truthful, I liked Cate back then. IMHO, she would have made a delightful FReeper...

Charles assures me that I had nothing to do with her crackup -- that she just turned against everyone and everything she had previously embraced with great warmth and enthusiasm. Sad, indeed...

I'm still mystified -- and can't help but wonder if Cate developed a romantic attachment to "Timmy" McVeigh.

(It wasn't until folks here on FR started questioning her overall intentions and integrity that I began to seriously consider that there might possibly be another explanation for her behavior...)

So...

Who is more credible here, McCauley or Davis?


One word: "Davis".


TXnMA (No Longer!!!)

57 posted on 11/01/2002 7:21:43 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Thanks for your insight!
58 posted on 11/01/2002 7:47:32 PM PST by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Thanks for your perspective. The unique information you are able to provide to this enigma of Davis vs. McCauley is an example of what makes this forum so valuable to those trying to find the truth about the OKC bombing.

In the few meetings McVeigh had with one of his first attorneys, Susan Otto, McVeigh passed information to her sufficient for her to tell Jones that once he knew what she knew, he would "never think of the United States of America in the same way."

It is possible that McVeigh shared some of the same information with McCauley. McCauley described McVeigh as a brave man, was that romantic infatuation, plain stupidity,admiration for the manner in which he met his death, or did McVeigh and the government permit McCauley a glance similiar to one provided Susan Otto?

59 posted on 11/01/2002 7:48:12 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: honway
, was that romantic infatuation, plain stupidity, admiration for the manner in which he met his death, or did McVeigh and the government permit McCauley a glance similiar to one provided Susan Otto?

As I said, my assumption has always been that it was the first: romantic infatuation.

After all my years of investigation, I assumed that Susan Otto was referring to Clinton/Reno's de facto conversion of the FBI from the FB of Investigation into the FB of Prosecution and/or the FB of Prevarication. Or worse, as in the cases of Waco and Ruby Ridge, into the FB of Execution.

60 posted on 11/01/2002 8:25:24 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson