Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Tom Daschle Oppose 'Choice'?
CNSNews.com ^ | 11/29/02 | Ron Marr

Posted on 11/29/2002 12:01:20 PM PST by Jean S

I ignored Tom Daschle when, some weeks back, he accused conservative media figures of endangering his life.

"What happens when Rush Limbaugh attacks those of us in public life is that people aren't just content to listen," said the Senator. "People want to act because they get emotional...and the threats to those of us in public life go up dramatically, against us and against our families."

I admittedly have little regard for the ideas of Senator Daschle, and categorized his tirade as sour grapes from a man whose party went down in flames during the mid-term elections. Rather than admitting that Democrats failed to provide ideas or solutions, he sought to place blame. This is nothing new. Liberals are rarely known for grace in defeat.

However, Al Gore has now jumped on Senator Daschle's bandwagon. In a recent New York Observer interview, Gore whined of how "unfair" the press had become.

"There are some major institutional voices that are, truthfully, speaking part and parcel of the Republican Party," said Gore. "Fox News Network, The Washington Times, Rush Limbaugh...there's a bunch of them, and some of them are financed by wealthy ultra-conservative billionaires who make political deals with Republican administrations and the rest of the media."

I'm smelling a trend arising from the Democratic Party. When you lose, you do not ask yourself why or quest for future remedy. Instead, in denial, you attempt to stifle disparate voices. Like Al Gore (and Hillary Clinton before him) you hint of "vast right-wing conspiracies." Like Daschle, you speak of the "danger" you're in.

And all this is a facade, a sham, a smokescreen. What Daschle and Gore really detest is the First Amendment. Limbaugh's attacks have not been on Daschle personally. They have been on his policies and beliefs. Fox News has become popular because the cable network offers both sides of the political debate an opportunity to speak. What Daschle and Gore seem to be saying is that they fully support a public discourse, as long as the discourse portrays them as saints and their ideological adversaries as sinners.

Most people see the caterwauling of these two for what it is, frustration in defeat, fear of fading from the public eye and anger over the loss of personal power. However, I am bothered by something else. I am bothered by the hypocrisy of such as Gore and Daschle, particularly the latter. Daschle went so far as to link the violent fundamentalism seen in other countries to the "shrill tone" of "Rush Limbaugh and all the Rush wannabes."

Since I fall into that latter category, I've a few questions for Senator Daschle. Why sir, if you are so concerned about shrill tones in the media, and the menace they pose to public figures, were you utterly silent when the following statements were made by liberals?

Why, Senator, did you remain silent when producer Spike Lee said the solution to gun violence was to "shoot Charlton Heston with a .44 Bulldog."

Why Senator, did you remain silent when actor Alec Baldwin publicly called for the stoning" of Henry Hyde during the Lewinsky scandal?

Why, Senator, did you remain silent when Richard Gephardt called Newt Gingrich and his supporters "trickle down terrorists who base their agenda on division, exclusion and fear."

Why Senator, did you remain silent when James Carville said that Ken Starr was "one mistake away from not having any kneecaps." For that matter, why did you keep silent when Carville referred to Paula Jones with the comment "you drag $100 bills through trailer parks and there's no telling what you'll find."

Why, Senator, did you remain silent when NPR's Sunni Khalid said that Newt Gingrich was "looking at a more scientific, a more civil way of lynching people."

Why, Senator, did you remain silent when columnist Julianne Malveaux said "I hope Clarence Thomas's wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early, like many black men do, because of heart disease. He is an utterly reprehensible person."

And why Senator, did you remain silent when Clinton advisor Paul Begala, in the wake of Al Gore's 2000 election loss, explained the famous "red and blue map" (with "red" indicating counties that voted Republican) in the following manner. "You see the state where James Byrd was lynch-dragged behind a pickup truck until his body came apart? It's red. You see the state where Matthew Shepherd was crucified on a split-rail fence for the crime of being gay? It's red. You see the state where right-wing extremists blew up a federal office building and murdered scores of federal employees? It's red."

Why, Senator, did you remain silent when in fact YOUR state was primarily "red." Do you believe that the aforementioned words were less an incitement to violence than Limbaugh's criticism of your legislative proposals? Do you not view these statements as "shrill rhetoric," or were they fitting and proper because they arose from Democrats?

Do the words of Limbaugh and all us "wannabes" really put you in physical danger, Senator? Or, does the danger lie in the fact that thepresentation of viewpoints divergent from your own provide an alternate perspective?

Isn't it you, Senator, who has spoken endlessly on the importance of "choice?"

(Ron Marr is the founder of The Trout Wrapper, the official magazine of Montana's Tobacco Root Mountains. The publication believes in "big guns, big dogs and big bar tabs." Founded in 1994, The Trout Wrapper says it is "dedicated to hunting down and publicly tormenting the humor impaired," and it espouses the "wholesale abuse of all things politically correct.")


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: daschle; gore; media

1 posted on 11/29/2002 12:01:20 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"Does Tom Daschle Oppose 'Choice'?"

Does a bear poop in the woods???

All Democratic Socialists define "tolerance" as accepting anything that falls under the Liberal umbrella. Everything else is subversive, dangerous, fascist, bigoted, etc, etc, etc. It is to this longstanding policy of faux-tolerance that my screen name is dedicated.

2 posted on 11/29/2002 12:13:38 PM PST by intolerancewillNOTbetolerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Very nice article and oh so true.

Thanks for the post!!!

3 posted on 11/29/2002 12:25:45 PM PST by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Why Senator, did you remain silent when your House counterpart (Dickless Gephardt) told Fox News, that the DNC video showing the President of the United States pushing an old person in a wheelchair down the stairs, need not be taken down, and refused to repudiate it?

Huh, Senator Dasc-hole?

Punk loser!
4 posted on 11/29/2002 12:29:50 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Oh, but that's different, y'see, those were attacks against conservatives, the "bad" guys!

Peggy Noonan made an excellent point in her recent column, stating that she herself, and anyone who expresses an opinion or takes a stand on something, gets reactions from people who don't agree, even to the point of threats on their lives. That's a fact of life, unfortunately.
5 posted on 11/29/2002 12:36:14 PM PST by Theresawithanh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
Dashole's position on ANY issue depends on how much his wife's consulting firm has been paid for his vote/influence. She is the bag lady. She gets the money and he delivers what she has been paid for him to deliver. That, of course, is why he won't let anyone see his tax returns. Folks would wonder why the bag lady is paid five (or more) times what comparable consultants are paid. It is becuase THEY weren't able to deliver the vote/support of the Senate Majority Leader.

What is Tommie's position on choice? What has his wife, the bag lady, been paid for it to be?

7 posted on 11/29/2002 1:16:48 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Poor Lil Timmy Dasshole... he's been VICTIMIZED by big 'ole mean, vicious Rush Limbaugh.
And poor Wooden Goreon. Not only has he been VICTIMIZED by Rush, he's also been VICTIMIZED by The Washington Times and Fox News as well!

Hey fellas, I feel for ya. Guess ya could say I even feel yer pain.

NOT!!

8 posted on 11/29/2002 1:34:20 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Why Senator, did you severely under-estimate the intellegence of the American people?
9 posted on 11/29/2002 2:33:30 PM PST by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Does Tom Daschle Oppose 'Choice'?

Only if Republicans are for it. Seriously though, Tom Daschle opposes all opposition, including himself. Last week he had to get a restraining order against himself and he even opposed that.

10 posted on 11/29/2002 2:38:29 PM PST by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
Your remarks bear repeating:

"Why Senator, did you severely under-estimate the intellegence of the American people?"


11 posted on 11/29/2002 5:37:34 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Spike Lee, Alec Baldwin, Richard Gephardt, James Carville, Sunni Khalid, Julianne Malveaux, Paul Begala and...

from TPDL 1999-Apr-8, from Capital Hill Blue, by Doug Thompson:


12 posted on 11/29/2002 5:59:09 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slimer
Does Tom Daschle Oppose 'Choice'? Usually. And not only for free speech, but for education, gun ownership, retirement investment, health care payments, union membership, private property developement, seat belts, smoking, associations......
13 posted on 11/29/2002 7:16:14 PM PST by eccentric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson