Lott was only spilling GOP's dirty little secret

Houston Chronicle ^ | December 15, 2002 | FERNANDO DOVALINA

[Dog Gone]

Journalists finally are shedding full light on what they and most minorities have known for decades: that the Republicans' ugly secret and the secret to some of their success is their subtle appeal to racists. The trigger for this national discussion was Republican Senate leader Trent Lott's warm tribute to Strom Thurmond and that retiring senator's 1948 presidential campaign, which was based on a racist platform.

What took journalists so long?

Part of the answer is that Republicans have been too hard to pin down. They have played a two-faced strategy exceedingly well.

They have to. This country hasn't been predominantly segregated for decades. Even as long ago as the 1948 election, Thurmond captured only four Southern states, including Lott's Mississippi. In Texas, though, Thurmond won only 9 percent of the vote.

Successful national Republican politicians know how to get elected. They know they have to win the good will of Americans who believe in equal rights, while at the same time winning the votes of the minority of Americans who remain racist (and sexist, homophobic and anti-Semitic).

The Republican party's public face says it is the party of Lincoln, that it stands for all that is good, including equal rights. The other face peeks out of the darkness and whispers to the good ol' boys who wish for the good ol' days, "Boys, you know who your friends are. We're the party of Jesse Helms, not Jesse Jackson."

Since they can't appear to be insensitive to equal rights, much less racist, Republicans appeal to both factions by using code words and buzz words. The words are a wink to the racists, who understand the language.

Minorities know the code/buzz words, too, of course: "states rights," "affirmative action," "special interests," "special rights," "liberal ideas," even "Al Sharpton," even "Hillary Clinton." Is it any wonder that most blacks, even conservative ones, simply can't pull that lever for the GOP?

Now, an incautious moment in the life of Trent Lott, the putative Senate majority leader, has opened the door widely on the party, and racism has come out of the closet. How the Republican Party ultimately handles the scandal will be a measure of its soul.

This is what Lott said recently about Mississippi, the state he represents in the Senate, and Thurmond, who ran for president in 1948 on a segregationist platform:

"I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years."

Racists and minorities, especially blacks, know the true meaning of these words. Here is the translation:

"I want to say this about my state. When Strom Thurmond ran for president on a segregation- now, segregation-forever platform, we voted for him, that is, we whites in Mississippi voted for him. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have all these problems with blacks (and Hispanics, homosexuals and uppity women) over all these years."

Some conservatives dismissed Lott's praise of Thurmond as a kind gesture to a 100-year-old senator who will not be returning to the chamber. Why such a symbol of a heinous past was even being lionized is beyond explanation to many Americans.

For a while, it seemed that Lott's tribute would quickly be forgotten in the spate of news about war and terrorism. It was not meant to be.

Slowly, first with black politicians and black groups, then spreading to conservative institutions, criticism of Lott began to snowball. To many right-thinking Republicans, Lott has turned into embarrassment hurting the president, his party and their programs.

So, Lott, who seemed to have an air of defiance when he lauded Thurmond, tucked tail between legs and apologized, saying that "a poor choice of words conveyed to some the impression that I embraced the discarded policies of the past." Everyone knows he's lying. He meant to say what he said, and his regret is that his intemperate statement about what he really believes has already cost him dearly.

President Bush, who, after all, has a black secretary of state, a black security adviser and many other minorities in his circles, has been persuaded to publicly censure his own party's Senate leader. But in doing so, he also tried to put an end to the matter by saying that Lott has apologized. In other words, the matter is now closed. Things will go on as before. The president does not appear willing to show courage in defying the ugly face of the party, even as he tries to shore up the other face.

And that's exactly what it will take, courage, to tell the American people, the good-hearted and the racist alike, that the two major parties differ on many issues, but not on this one, that all men and women are created equal and that anyone who diverges from that principle no longer has a home in either party, and that includes you, Trent Lott.

President Lyndon B. Johnson showed that kind of courage in the 1960s. As he signed civil rights legislation, this son of the South told one adviser that he was also signing away his party's hopes of keeping the South for years to come. He was right, and the Republican Party took advantage of that fortitude.

Thurmond, who ran for president as a so-called Dixiecrat in 1948 after bolting the Democrats over the party's strong civil rights platform, opposed integration at all levels, including the military. President Harry S Truman, the Democrat who won the nomination of his party that year and who was expected to lose, had preferred a softer civil rights program, but in the end he accepted the tougher plank, and days later, four months before the election, he showed his stuff, signing Executive Order 9981.

That order began the process that resulted in the integration of our military forces. Truman surprised everybody and won the election anyway.

Truman's courage, like Johnson's, needs to be remembered as Americans of all colors prepare for the possibility of waging war together, which, under a President Thurmond, would never have occurred.

As more journalists look into Lott's life, we are told every day of his previous impolitic remarks and actions. It is clear that what he said was not a slip of the tongue, a one-time mistake. He has said this before. Will Lott save himself with a more forthright apology? If he does, will we believe that he means it or that he is merely trying to save his hide?

Already a movement to have him resign his leadership role has gained momentum.

Many Americans wonder why that would be enough. They wonder why Senate censure-- even resignation from the Senate-- is not warranted. They wonder why the party that became livid over a president's lies about his sexual escapades is not as enraged over a Senate leader's longing for a shameful and unconstitutional past in which some Americans did not enjoy full rights, and over his lies -- to say nothing of his incredible stupidity -- about having expressed such keen longing in public.

Dovalina is a playwright who retired as an assistant managing editor of the Houston Chronicle. He is one of the founders of the Houston affiliate of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

[Dog Gone]

I didn't realize "liberal ideas" and "Hillary Clinton" were actually code words we use to appeal to racists.

[Bob]

Not too many people are pointing out that the Dixiecrat party was a splinter party off of the democRATs not the Republicans. How convenient.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

...their subtle appeal to racists...

Nothing subtle about the DNC's code words. Byrd.. [KKK, N-word, racist letter against blacks in the military, marathon filibuster of a civil rights bill], Hollings [cannibals], Hillary [F-ing Jew Bast-d].

Yes, Lott needs a good spanking. But there are three others in the Senate who need removal.

[Drango]

So says some pedophile from the left....

[Mr. K]

What a liberal DUMBA$$- geez, someone even printed this????

"President Lyndon B. Johnson showed that kind of courage in the 1960s. As he signed civil rights legislation, this son of the South told one adviser that he was also signing away his party's hopes of keeping the South for years to come. He was right, and the Republican Party took advantage of that fortitude."

If I remember correctly (don't flame me this is an exact quote) Johnson said "I'll have them niggers voting democrat for years"

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Wasn't Lott a rat in his segragationist days? And David Duke, wasn't he a rat in his KKK days? Byrd, Hollings, and Hillary knew the GOP would never take them in. Trash like that can't find a place outside the DNC.

[Petronski]

[vomit]

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

If I remember correctly (don't flame me this is an exact quote) Johnson said "I'll have them n#####rs voting democrat for years"

I'd be very interested in having that confirmed. I'll check out google asap. You have a link or can you site a source? That is no small quote. Man!

[Tacis]

The Republicans must change!! They must abandon their segregationist views. When the new Congress convenes, Republicans must stop segregation and join the Congressional Black Caucus to demonstrate that they, too, are interested in solving the problems that face black citizens. This is only the first step in overcoming the racial segregation problems that face us today.

Amazingly, it has always been the democraps that have been racists. Sheets Byrd was a KKK member. Fulbright and PanderAl's father were segregationists. This is just more of the ultr-left wing's barbra streisand. The media will echo this in never ending iterations.

[Chancellor Palpatine]

We've been badly underserved by the Senate GOP on his selection. They had to know he'd been playing with those segregationist groups and had developed a history of segregationist politics, yet selected him for leadership anyway. Its easy to dismiss gadfly comments from a single Senator, but a leader? No way.

[F-117A]

What we're seeing is the verbal lyncing of "the white nigger", Trent Lott! If they succeed, they will be coming after the rest of the "white niggers" - the republicans!

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

President Lyndon B. Johnson showed that kind of courage in the 1960s.

Lyndon B. Johnson was probably the most uncouth, vile, foul mouthed, racist, underhanded, vulgar, churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce, cockered bum-bailey poofter, craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff, gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb, dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill bag of animal filth that ever held the office of President of the United States. And that includes X42. At least Bubba had a wee dram of couth.

By comparison, he makes Trent Lott look like Martin Luther King Jr.

[Inkie]

This Dovalina person feels quite comfortable besmirching 50% of the nation.

[ChadGore]

Lott congradulates the life long work of Strom Thurman, and because his skin is white, and because he's from the south, the racists reaction of the democrat party is to assume the guy is something he's not ?

Deplorable.

[Dog Gone]

Yet it's always Democrats who play the race card. Only by keeping racism, real or imagined, in the news can they keep minority voting blocks in the Rat party.

The last thing they want to do is have racism disappear as an issue.

[F-117A]

Republicans must stop segregation and join the Congressional Black Caucus to demonstrate that they, too, are interested in solving the problems that face black citizens.

Republicans cannot join the Congressional Black Causus. Even J.C Watts was not permitted to join. It is the "Democrat" Congressional Black Causus.

[chiller]

Dear Mr. Dovliano....

....shove it. You are a reprehensible lying bastard.

REPUBLICAN journalists and conservatives were the FIRST to repudiate one of our own. And we don't accept 'a wink and a nod'.

Given years of Democrat promises to black voters that have
never materialized, I'd say the dems are doing all the
winking and nodding.

1948 Dixiecrats were above all Democrats.

You're disgusting

[Dog Gone]

This Dovalina person feels quite comfortable besmirching 50% of the nation.

He fit right in with the rest of the editorial board of the Houston Chronicle.

[Sir_Humphrey]

Is it any wonder that most blacks, even conservative ones, simply can't pull that lever for the GOP?

Nice scare tactic. I guess they have no second thoughts about pulling the lever for a party who has a former KKK member as a senator and who uses the "n" word on national TV.

I might respect the integrey of this "journalist" if he could point to one, just one bill pending in congress or supported by the GOP that is racist.

[CanisMajor2002]

Democrat Race Record bump