Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARAB BEATS UP JEWISH GIRL AT B'KLYN SCHOOL
New York Post ^ | 12/17/02 | CARL CAMPANILE and MURRAY WEISS

Posted on 12/17/2002 8:19:45 AM PST by nypokerface

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:10:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

December 17, 2002 -- Religious tensions erupted yesterday after authorities confirmed that an Arab girl beat up a Jewish girl at a Brooklyn middle school.

The Arab teen was arrested and suspended for the Dec. 12 attack on the 13-year-old Jewish girl, an honors student, at IS 259 in Dycker Heights, sources said.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: brooklyn; educationnews; muchado
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last
To: JMP
We had a bunch of Arabs pick on a girl because whe was Jewish and one attacked her.
You are belittling the incident.
221 posted on 12/17/2002 3:32:05 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Because Arabs are more PC than Jews and have been ever since Stalin set that policy in 1953.
222 posted on 12/17/2002 3:32:59 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Send the perps back home so they can use sand for toilet paper and toothpaste.

Hahaha  .......

223 posted on 12/17/2002 3:35:35 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I don't know who attacked who. My point is that you don't know either. The article does not give you the facts to know. It is your biases as well as the bias in the article that causes your mind to fabricate any facts that you might need to justify your bias. Thats my point, nothing more. Your cognitive processes are showing.
224 posted on 12/17/2002 3:41:11 PM PST by JMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: JMP
OK, I give up.

The entire article is a complete fabrication.
225 posted on 12/17/2002 3:42:02 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: JMP
and just makes you look like a *looser*

Uhhhhh.....never mind.

226 posted on 12/17/2002 3:45:50 PM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
JMPs a looser.

This is vey series.
227 posted on 12/17/2002 3:46:40 PM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
First Dr. Roberts claims victimhood status for the attackers

When did I do that?

Are you a Neo-nazi or sympathyser, an Islamist or sympathyser, or an America and Jew hating leftist? I don't have enough information to tell which yet. (Is't it sad that these groups overlap so much)

Perhaps you missed the Al-Jazeera tapes where both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Al Zawaheeri claimed AL-Qaeda's responsibiility

Sure, that was OBL on that tape (must have had some facial bone reconstruction done).

1. Saddam was also sponsored by the USSR.
2. Who says that OBL is unimportant.

As to #1 so what? As to #2, Bush did on March 13th 2002. No, I just think for myself and look at the big picture as to who has ultimately gained and lost after 9/11. I.e...

Lost Gained
Freedoms of U.S. citizens Oil companies, smallpox vaccine companies, subsidary of Haliburton that makes the detention centers in Camp X-Ray, Carlisle

Perhaps you missed the Al-Jazeera tapes where both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Al Zawaheeri claimed AL-Qaeda's responsibiility

Seems that OBL had some some serious facial surgery (different nose) and gained a bit of weight in that scene.

1. Saddam was also sponsored by the USSR.
2. Who says that OBL is unimportant

As to #1, so what? As to #2, Bush did on March 13th 2002.

228 posted on 12/17/2002 3:47:14 PM PST by droberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: JMP
Did you believe any of the other facts reported in the Post today? The weather? Do you think they lied outright about the Jewish girl having been harassed? Did they lie about the Arab girls chanting "Jew Jew Jew!" They did, in fact, report a pattern of events leading up to the beating. You think it was pure lies? Press bias is one thing, but you are asking us to attribute malice to this reporter in what is usually a more conservative voice among NYC papers.

There is plety of press criticism on FR, so jump right in: Do YOU have any evidence the reporter is fabricating? Any pattern of previous fabrication? Freepers catch lies in the Times all the time, but they always have facts and alternative sources to back it up. Do you have any facts about THIS reporter and THIS story to suggest it isn't straightforward reporting?

If not, I'd say YOUR biases are the ones showing.

229 posted on 12/17/2002 3:48:41 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Nope. She will have three abortions and adopt a black baby in her 40's like every good Jewish liberal. Meanwhile each of the Arab girls will have 10 children and raise them to hate the Jews and America.

Ewgh! You're probably right. Pardon me, I have to look for a razor blade.

230 posted on 12/17/2002 3:59:04 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady; montag813
Gee, not much different from those "good" Catholic girls, eh?
231 posted on 12/17/2002 4:01:39 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
........We had a bunch of Arabs pick on a girl because whe was Jewish and one attacked her. You are belittling the incident...........
.
No, I'm not belittling anything. I stated what the article said. Others have fabricated more than what was stated. I have said that I do not know what happened yet I have the same set of facts as you. You get a lot more mileage out of the same facts. An agenda?


232 posted on 12/17/2002 4:08:36 PM PST by JMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
.........OK, I give up.

The entire article is a complete fabrication......
.
I didn't say that either.


233 posted on 12/17/2002 4:13:07 PM PST by JMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: JMP
>> I don't know who attacked who. My point is that you don't know either. The article does not give you the facts to know.

You said that. I agree with you.

The article may or may not be a fabrication. The facts are hard to judge. It may have been arabs beating up a girl who may be or may not have been jewish. SHe may be an honors student but then again, maybe not. The arabs, or a group of unidentified swarthy (maybe) persons, possibly honor students, may or may not have attacked a girl calling herself a jew. The police, may or may not have arrested an individual who may be a girl or an arab (maybe) in drag.
234 posted on 12/17/2002 4:19:50 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: eno_
............Do you have any facts about THIS reporter and THIS story to suggest it isn't straightforward reporting?
.
No I don't, but in the best case it is very poor reporting. I have stated earlier that it is curious that an altercation of this nature makes the news. You don't find that curious? What this article clearly states is Jew=good, Arab=bad. Maybe you believe that the article is stating Jew=bad and Arab=good. Is that what it is?
235 posted on 12/17/2002 4:27:25 PM PST by JMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
....the pedophile profit

Is there profit in pedophilia??

Sorry, couldn't resist. Of course you meant prophet......or did you? d;^)

236 posted on 12/17/2002 4:38:18 PM PST by Chuckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The only thing that irritates me is the knee-jerking that goes on around here as a matter of course.
237 posted on 12/17/2002 4:58:50 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: droberts
Teh British, French, and Jews gained from Peral Harbor.

It was the British, not the French who first attacked an enemy harbor with carrier borne planes with their raid on Taranto.
Using your logic, it was the British who bombed Pearl Harbor.

They probably even sunk the HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse teh next day to make it look good!

238 posted on 12/17/2002 5:21:38 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: JMP
No, you appear to have made judgments. Your statements are supportive of the idiots who feel opressed by teenage girls to the point they blow themselves up.

FACT1) The assailant is ARAB girl.
Fact2)The victim is a Jewish girl.
Fact3) the assailant taunted the victim repeatedly and using her ethnicity as a taunt.
Fact4)That is a hate crime.

Nope, not reading anything into it. You are.
239 posted on 12/17/2002 5:24:18 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: JMP
You said in post #163 and I quote: "1) We know the jewish young lady was an honor student. What do we know about the Arab girls academics?"

You made it an issue.
So, The arabs now feel opressed because they can't get on the honor roll?
240 posted on 12/17/2002 5:26:00 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson