Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Episcopalian leader lashes out at Bush for 'reprehensible' policy (the world right to loathe us)
Newark Star Ledger ^ | 1/14/03 | KEVIN ECKSTROM

Posted on 01/14/2003 10:04:43 AM PST by Incorrigible

Episcopalian leader lashes out at Bush for 'reprehensible' policy

Tuesday, January 14, 2003
BY KEVIN ECKSTROM
RELIGION NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON -- The top bishop of the Episcopal Church, in a stinging rebuke of American foreign policy, said the United States is rightly "hated and loathed" around the world for its "reprehensible" rhetoric and blind eye toward poverty and suffering.

"I'd like to be able to go somewhere in the world and not have to apologize for being from the United States," Presiding Bishop Frank T. Griswold 3rd said Friday in an interview with Religion News Service.

Griswold, head of the 2.3million-member church, blasted the Bush administration for its wartime rhetoric, especially labeling Iran, Iraq and North Korea an "axis of evil."

"Quite apart from the bombs we drop, words are weapons and we have used our language so unwisely, so intemperately, so thoughtlessly ... that I'm not surprised we are hated and loathed everywhere I go," he said.

The increasing likelihood of a U.S.-led attack on Iraq also drew strong criticism yesterday from Pope John Paul II, who argued that military force should be used only as "the very last option" -- and then only under certain conditions.

Amid a buildup of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf, John Paul urged political leaders to step up their diplomatic efforts to avoid war, which he said would only harm ordinary Iraqis "already sorely tried" by 12 years of U.N. sanctions.

"War is not always inevitable. It is always a defeat for humanity," the pope told Vatican-based diplomats in his annual speech on issues of concern to the Roman Catholic Church.

"As the charter of the United Nations organization and international law itself remind us, war cannot be decided upon, even when it is a matter of ensuring the common good, except as the very last option and in accordance with very strict conditions, without ignoring the consequences for the civilian population both during and after the military operations."

It was the pope's strongest message yet in opposition to war, and it was the first time since the crisis erupted that he has publicly mentioned Iraq by name.

Griswold has spoken early and often against war with Iraq, arguing, along many other religious leaders, that a pre-emptive strike against Saddam Hussein fails to meet the necessary criteria for a just war.

Griswold conceded that religious opposition to the war has failed to resonate at the White House, especially "if indeed everyone is praying and invoking God here and there as they struggle to make these decisions."

He said Bush is "inviting" trouble from the other points on the "axis of evil" -- Iran and North Korea -- with his bellicose rhetoric, although Griswold said the president is "hardly dealing with paragons of virtue" in either case.

Bush has consulted with religious leaders, including Griswold, throughout his term but generally has enjoyed cozier relations with evangelical Protestants, who tend to be more supportive of the president's domestic and foreign policy.

White House spokeswoman Mercy Viana said the president is committed to humanitarian aid in Afghanistan and North Korea and working with the United Nations to disarm Iraq.

"Our national security depends on success in the war on terrorism, which includes military, judicial, diplomatic, financial and humanitarian actions, both at home and abroad," she said. "Our goal is to protect the American people and shape a future of peace."

While he has tried to avoid "shouting and screaming," the 65-year-old prelate has stepped up his verbal tempo in pointed rebukes of how the United States treats the rest of the world, particularly with its money.

Speaking Sunday at the Washington National Cathedral to mark his fifth anniversary as presiding bishop, Griswold said American reluctance to spend more on AIDS in Africa is "a manifestation of evil" and a "form of sin from which we as a nation are called to repent."

Griswold said the AIDS pandemic poses a far graver security threat to the United States by spawning a generation of orphans who live in abject poverty in fragile African democracies.

"We are loathed, and I think the world has every right to loathe us, because they see us as greedy, self-interested and almost totally unconcerned about poverty, disease and suffering," he said.

In a follow-up conversation, Griswold softened his criticisms, putting them in more nuanced terms. He said the "last thing" he wants to do is demonize either the president or the larger government.

"My sense is that we have been so abundantly blessed as a nation that it's all the more incumbent upon us that we share those blessing with others," he said. "God's concern is for the world and not simply for a nation. ... Too often we narrow down faith to serve our own immediate concerns and national interests."

In many ways, Griswold reserved his strongest condemnations for what he sees as a disconnect between the country's God-talk and the values of the Christian gospel, which emphasize care for the poor, the downtrodden and the hungry.

"If these are God's values and we claim to be a nation under God, then we better take them seriously, or we better take the words away and say it's a joke, or it's a piece of decoration."

Diane Knippers, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, a conservative think tank that monitors the mainline churches, called Griswold's remarks "extremist" and unhelpful.

"I can go places and talk to people who do not admire the United States, but I also go places where it's clear that people admire us," Knippers said. "We are still the nation where people are constantly knocking at the door to get in."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Not for commercial use.  For educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; bush; catholic; catholiclist; dianeknippers; episcopalchurch; episcopalian; griswold; iraq; mercyviana; newjersey; nj; peace; pope; starledger; twistedknickers; un; vatican; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Incorrigible
Frankly speaking, Frank old bean, I'd like to be able to walk among my fellow Christians without having to apologize for the fact the my church's Presiding Bishop is a complete moron. That's you, you know. A giant embarrassment.
21 posted on 01/14/2003 11:02:07 AM PST by Snickersnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Perhaps if these so-called "religious leaders" were anything more than "whited sepulchres" of political correctness they would be growing at the fantastic rate enjoyed by the evangelical protestants and their world view would be more in line with that of Christian principle than Maoist theory.

22 posted on 01/14/2003 11:03:59 AM PST by prov1813man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
What a joker. If the Episcopal Church doesn't shape up pretty soon, they'll be goners. Too bad. It used to be a pretty good denomination.
23 posted on 01/14/2003 11:04:33 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
I'd like him to go someplace where he doesn't have to apologize for being from the United States, too.

Someplace remote, where the subject never even comes up.
24 posted on 01/14/2003 11:04:41 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
In our town, the academics are most likely to be Episcopalians. Answer your own question...
25 posted on 01/14/2003 11:05:12 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobg
I grew up in the Episcopal church, back in the 50s-60s.
It was great and beautiful then...I cry for what they are doing now, and I no longer attend...
26 posted on 01/14/2003 11:08:34 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Thanks! I've been following Bp. Griswold's opinions on the Episcopal Church's web site. I do share his opinion that there's plenty to criticize about Bush's foreign policy, but I don't see much criticism regarding the actions of Saddam Hussein. OTOH, his criticisms of Israel seem to be balanced by criticisms of the Palestinian leadership as well. He's reacting greatly to the suffering he sees, but not enough I think to the causes.
27 posted on 01/14/2003 11:09:27 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dighton
"I'd like to be able to go somewhere in the world and not have to apologize for being from the United States," Presiding Bishop Frank T. Griswold 3rd said

And soon, you will wish you could go somewhere in the US without being pointed out as a predictably leftist dimwit.

These people do not strike me as representing any religion whatsoever, other than Marxism dressed up as "progressive like progressivism, man". And they should be publicly treated as such.

I once emailed a stinging reply to one nitwit pastor's diatribe against America published in our UMC church newsletter right after 9/11 - and emailed it to the entire alternative service's choir and band which I was participating in. You should have seen that pompous little Clymer backtrack in his hastily put-together emailed reply to the same addressee's I emailed (took him until 2:40 in the morning to put it all together and send it...heh-heh).

I have no respect for these fashionable idiots - and feel that they need to be confronted everytime they mouth off with their traitorous, socialist drivel.

28 posted on 01/14/2003 11:10:08 AM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
"What the H*** is going on? Is the Episcopal Church now part of the Left? Stupid question, probably."

Sam.... while our heads were turned . . .

The Episcopalian Church Began Ordaining Homosexuals

Historically the Episcopal Church has been more receptive to gay worshipers than many other Christian denominations.

They welcome gay and lesbian members, ordain non-practicing homosexuals, and participate in anti-hate programs. They do not, however, perform same-sex union ceremonies.

29 posted on 01/14/2003 11:11:26 AM PST by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabidone
"Get real- Saddam has been oppressing his people since he took over in the 80's and we weren't concerned unitl he threatened Kuwaiti oil reserves in '91. There is nothing humanitarian in our interest and with good reason- if we went out trying to save every oppressed people across the globe we'd never be done fighting. Our interest in Iraq is directly or indirectly connected to oil as, like it or not, oil is like oxygen or water- in our present circumstance it is necessary for our survival."

I agree 100%. We don't really give a shit about the people in Iraq. They could have rebelled against their tyrant leader, but they didn't. As far as the oil goes, that's a good enough reason to go to war if you ask me. This whole operation is just an excuse to get our own gas station. And I say F*ckn' a bubba.
30 posted on 01/14/2003 11:14:29 AM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re; BlueLancer; hellinahandcart
"We are I am loathed, and I think the world Americans [have] every right to loathe us me, because they see us me as a pompous over-bearing anti-American windbag.
31 posted on 01/14/2003 11:14:29 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bobg
Bishop Spong has said a lot of things, but that doesn't mean that such is Episcopalian doctrine.
32 posted on 01/14/2003 11:18:08 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus
He could always go to HELL; Satan is completely indifferent to apologies.
33 posted on 01/14/2003 11:42:01 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RonF
"his criticisms of Israel seem to be balanced by criticisms of the Palestinian leadership"

Finding moral equivalency between the outright hatred and murder of the Palestinians and the efforts at self defense of the Israelis is truly abhorrent.

I grew up an Episcopalian, but if this guy is representative, and I think his being top bishop means he is, am glad no longer to be one. It's going to be very hard to convince me that the guy is not a leftist.

34 posted on 01/14/2003 11:49:23 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Heck, even the RCC will formally ordain non-practicing homosexuals. In practice, they've been doing a lot worse than that.
35 posted on 01/14/2003 11:52:34 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I'm not going to try to convince you that this guy is not a leftist! I have no problem with Israeli self-defense, and self-defense against suicide/murderers requires radical efforts. But I think that there have been measures that they've taken that were beyond self-defense and have been counter-productive to peace. For example, bulldozing Arafat's compound around him only built up Arafat's image and allowed him to stay in power when it was starting to look as though he was losing influence. I think that both Sharon and Arafat talk peace but seek subjugation or annihilation of the other side.
36 posted on 01/14/2003 11:56:16 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Looks like another of the places all the 60's radicals went when they "grew up," and I use that term advisedly, has been into the clergy. That is, aside from into academia, media, the arts and politics.
37 posted on 01/14/2003 11:58:57 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I heard much the same anger and hysteria from a liberal Presbyterian preacher a couple of weeks ago. They sense they are losing power and, like Senate Democrats, they're flipping out about it.

The last Lambeth Conference the liberals from America and Britain were outvoted by pro-life conservatives from the Third World. In the Presbyterian Church, a proposal to allow gay ordination in the US was voted down 3-1. The National Council of Churches is bankrupt and ignored. They were shocked Gore lost in 2000. The loss of the Senate in 2002, Bush's popularity and upcoming war with Iraq has them apoplectic.

As their power continues to ebb and their denominations lose members, they'll get worse.

38 posted on 01/14/2003 12:11:35 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The real answer here for the Bishop...is simply don't apologize. If you stood there in Bavaria in 1923 and grasped what a danger Hitler was at that point...and could figure out that he might kill millions...would you kill the dimwit right there on the street or simply apologize later for giving Hitler the benifit of a doubt...and walk away. The Bishop is apparently on some guilt trip and thinks that all humans have a nature to do good. Stand on a LA street corner with $100 hanging out of your pocket and watch how quick you get assaulted. Go to the streets of Cario and admit you are American and watch how quick they jump on you and beat you up. Run off to downtown Mexico City and drive a big convertiable around....and wait till they come to rob you. The Bishop doesn't grasp that the world is full of evil and good must take on evil...or else we suffer in the end.
39 posted on 01/14/2003 12:23:42 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Arafat's Al Fatah has, I believe, sworn destruction of the Jewish state, not surprising Sharon wishes him subjugated. Again, the moral equivalency does not apply.

Do you actually think Griswold is not leftist?

I am sure, FWIW, that there are Episcopalian parishes that continue to cherish traditional Christian values, and I am sure, after reading this article that Griswold does not represent them. I am supposing, though, that to become chief bishop, he must at least be representative of the "powers that be" in the church.
40 posted on 01/14/2003 12:27:24 PM PST by Sam Cree (I like steak tartar, though)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson