Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaeda Supporters Threaten Nuclear Attacks
International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism ^ | 1/10/02 | Reuven Paz

Posted on 01/17/2003 1:15:28 PM PST by Angelus Errare

Al Qaida Supporters Threaten Nuclear Attacks

Recently, the moderator of an Islamist Internet forum frequented by al-Qaida supporters wrote that Al-Qaida possesses, and will use, dirty bombs and "virus bombs" against the United States. The author, Abu Shihab al-Qandahari, is regarded by experts on the al-Qaida network as a figure of some importance, who appears to be fairly close to the organization's "official" propaganda apparatus.

For this reason, the threat is seen as being important, regardless of whether it can be regarded as a concrete threat; it is important in what it reveals about al-Qaida and its supporters, and how they see their war against the West. As ICT's Reuven Paz writes (see Commentary below): "even though this may be a false alarm, it would seem to reflect another stage in the escalation in the tone of al-Qa`idah propaganda, and as such, could raise the expectations of Islamists for a “mega operation” against the United States or Russia."

The First Islamist nuclear threat against the United States

Reuven Paz

Senior ICT Researcher

On December 26th 2002, the moderator of the radical Islamist Internet forum al-mojahedoon.net – Abu Shihab al-Qandahari – published a short article titled “The nuclear war is the solution for the destruction of the United States.” The forum is one of the main web sites of supporters of Qa`idat al-Jihad, and one of its most popular among radical Muslim youngsters. The author, nicknamed al-Qandahari, is a popular figure among the participants of the Islamist forums of al-Qa`idah supporters and one of the older ones there, and fought in Afghanistan. He appears to be of Yemeni origin, according to previous information he published in several of these forums. Naturally, the article gained lot of enthusiastic reactions in the forum from young sympathizers of al-Qa`idah.

The article could be viewed as a mere threat, which exploits numerous rumors from various sources. It may also be deliberate disinformation regarding al-Qa`idah’s possession of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons. Or it could be propaganda aimed at encouraging Islamists. Yet, this is the first time that such a threat has been made publicly by supporters of al-Qa`idah, at least by a figure who is known as close to the al-Qa`idah propaganda apparatus.

The short article is interesting in several aspects. Al-Qandahari writes about the American and Russian use of “dirty” weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Chechnya. Yet, he does not even mention at the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This may lead to the conclusion that the use of “dirty” weapons by al-Qa`idah should be a retaliation only against countries that have already used it.

The article is short and the usual “philosophical” elements typical of the writings of Islamist scholars against the United States or the West are missing.

To sum up, even though this may be a false alarm, it would seem to reflect another stage in the escalation in the tone of al-Qa`idah propaganda, and as such, could raise the expectations of Islamists for a “mega operation” against the United States or Russia.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following is a translation of the article

The nuclear war is the solution for the destruction of the United States Yes, you did read the title correctly. It is the only way to kill the maximum number of Americans. This is the nuclear terror, which Americans have never feared. In the Second World War, the United States used this weapon twice in three days due to the successful Japanese attack in Pearl Harbor. These days the United States is using the most violent and modern weapons to bomb innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and totally support the Russian war against the Chechens. Not out of love of the Russians but out of hatred of the Muslims.

The United States attacked Iraq using weapons that contaminated the lands and water by radiation for thousands of years. Furthermore, it used Uranium bombs to create maximum damage to the lands and human beings, so it could leave Muhammad’s Peninsula after turning it into a forbidden area that no one would consider visiting. Yet, it seems that the beasts of the White House have forgotten one very important fact – and we are very proud to note it – Al-Qa`idah.

This is the organization that terrorized the core of the infidel West, and made from several youngsters, who own nothing but love for Allah and his messenger, a means to punish the sons of the bitches. Moreover, these youngsters demonstrated the finest example of leaving the materialist life. They could enjoy the good life, yet they ran away from it, wishing only what Allah could give them. They sold their souls to Allah, and he accepted them.

Eye for eye and tooth for tooth. If the Americans have bombs that no one else owns, Al-Qa`idah is stronger. It owns “dirty bombs” and “lethal viruses bombs”, which could cover the American cities with deadly diseases and turn this nation, which is “a professional in contempt for other nations,” into a crowd of contaminated and sick people. The coming days would prove that Qa`idat al-Jihad is capable with Allah’s help, of turning the United States into a lake of lethal radiation, that would seem as the last days of humanity. It would also prove that Al-Qa`idah is very popular all over the Islamic world.

Yes, the United States and its allies would be destroyed, as a result of the misuse of their power against the weak. Their end is closer now, by the arms of the uprising youngsters, who while riding their horses, never step down but victorious or martyrs. In both cases this is their victory.

Pray much for your victorious brothers and to Allah who is almighty.

This is an announcement to all people, to enlighten only the believers. As to the deviates we ask Allah either to direct them or hurry in gathering their souls. As to our enemy – Allah will help us to defeat them.

Allah is behind all intentions, and he is merciful.

Abu Shihab al-Qandahari


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: islamicviolence; jihadinamerica; talibanlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Kevin Curry
Amen to this Kevin:

There is no asylum; there is no haven or safe place. They are hunted 24/7 by America's finest. One by one they will wink out like candles in a sudden night breeze.

After the winkout, there will only be a greasy spot in the desert sand or mountain rocks or an oily spot on the ocean's surface. No virgins, just a dirty and oily spot will be their legacy.

I'm sure that each one of these Islamofascists has night mares of what was left when their fellow goat humpers got their final hump in Yemen last year.

41 posted on 01/17/2003 11:39:44 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Freeploaders-- A $5/month donation is a cheap way to treat the left wing disease of FREEPLOADING!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Most likely we'll take 250k+ dead and sit on it. Without any response.

9/11 needed a nuclear attack on mecca. Anyone with any understanding in islam knew that.

We didn't, they'll hit harder, we'll do nothing.
42 posted on 01/17/2003 11:41:31 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
KC, the following reads like a cryptic 'go' message : ... by the arms of the uprising youngsters, who while riding their horses, never step down but victorious or martyrs. A suicide murderer or two riding in a containerized carton, bringing in a dirty bomb, two or three containers to chosen cities, all they were waiting for was the go message.
43 posted on 01/17/2003 11:54:25 PM PST by MHGinTN (Manama na, meep meep maneemie, manama na, meep mee menie ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Bad Example. Fundamentalist Christians are the ones who are obeying what it says in spreading the Gospel, and teaching the Church to obey God's word.

I guess it depends on your definition of what a "fundamentalist Christian" is. It can be anything from someone who is devout and interprets the Bible literally to those who insist that creationism be taught in public schools to conscientious objectors to apocalypse cultists to those who bomb abortion clinics because "abortion is murder".

Or it can be those who are obeying what it says in spreading the Gospel, and teaching the Church to obey God's word. Name your poison.

My overall point is that "fundamentalism", often a euphemism for "extremism", does not, in and of itself, justify condemnation of an entire belief system -- whatever it may entail.

44 posted on 01/18/2003 2:01:19 AM PST by Imal (Myrrh is Furder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Depressing situation. They got away with 9/11, they'll get away with a bio attack, they'll get away with a nuke attack.. And we'll just falter more and more.

Initially the situation was depressing and troubling. It actually goes back to the original Gulf War when Bush senior did not keep to the WMD doctrine. That doctrine, as he himself stated, was 'if anyone uses WMD on us, we will respond in kind'. After Saddam attacked our troops advancing toward Baghdad with chemical and biological weapons, (reference the aftermath known as Gulf War Syndrome), the WMD doctrine called for the nuking of Baghdad. This really should have been automatic. The problem was that Bush senior and his coalition had all kinds of strings and political conditions in place. The main goal was to keep the coalition together at any price. In hindsight, it was a stupid goal because there was no way that coalition was ever going to stay together for any extended length of time. We also should not have put chains on Israel. They should have been allowed to respond (according to the WMD doctrine) to the firing of ballistic missiles at them. What we are now left with is a world were possessing nuclear weapons does not give a nation any security. The non-nuclear nations feel free to attack us openly (Iraqi scuds at Israel) and covertly (9/11 and anthrax attacks on the US). To put it bluntly, the fear factor has been removed and that now makes the world a very dangerous place.

Our current President however, after personally surveying the results of our predicament in the World Trade Center carnage, is fixing to put the fear factor back in play. I dont think he will completely restore the WMD doctrine, which still calls for the nuking of Baghdad, but he will restore it with the most powerful conventional attack the world has ever seen.

45 posted on 01/18/2003 2:07:25 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Oops. That last sentence should read 'he will partially restore it with...'.
46 posted on 01/18/2003 2:11:31 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape; Monty; Imal; RaceBannon; Kevin Curry; IronJack; Nick Danger; JimRed; Grampa Dave; ..
...the nuking of Baghdad. This really should have been automatic. This is a very complex issue my friend. Our thermonuclear weapons turning Mecca or Baghadad into glass fields (and that's pretty much what our powerful weapons could do) would kill not just an enemy there (and not effectively that many 'warriors' but more of the non-combatants), the 'collateral damage' would be the end of this world as we know it. And if you pause to consider the worldwide consequences, that is a fair assumption, worldwide war between Islam and everyone else, with slaughter on an immense scale in towns and cities everywhere Islamic fanatics could reach.

For the U.S. to use such weaponry would require an enormous death and destruction here first. And that is understood by these fanatic Islamicists, so they are into a methodology that slowly escalates. Yes, many civilians were slaughtered by suicide murderers on 9/11/01. The calculation was that we would absorb such a number and enter into a worldwide war on Islam. That was a faulty assumption by them, in retrospect, because we are waging a determined and calculated war against terrorist organizations and states that sponsor such. The fanatics didn't accomplish their initial objective, but they haven't abandoned their goal and will continue to escalate the terror here, as they are able; hence our 'homeland security' efforts. Therein lies the snag, for us! We have a political party that actually wants to obstruct the effort to wage a successful war against the terrorists so that their party power will not be sucked away! The Daschle, Clinton, and Leahy style obstruction and dissonance aimed at fomenting division and protest is far more dangerous than during the Vietnam era for we are literally in a war for our survival!

The effect of democrat party obstruction and division, and the rumblings they foment as a tool to cancel this administration's success create an environment in this nation that blocks the reality of a thermonuclear response. That is the reality of democrat anti-administration efforts which endangers US most. Our military is awesome, but it has limitations. We are at war and we have a huge anti-administration effort from the opposition party that sees only their empowerment as their goal, missing the horrific internal consequences of our national demise (or ignoring it as a necessary adjunct for their political survival). Our enemies are well aware of this reality and will escalate ever so slowly, to bleed our resources and our national resolve. THAT is the greatest danger at this stage in our war on terrorism worldwide.

How does launching nukes counter economic assault? It doesn't work my friend. The blunting then dissolution of American influence worldwide is the goal of our enemies. There are ways to devastate this nation in one or two actions. [Drop me a freepmail and I'll explain, but not on an open forum.] Such actions would have a thermonuclear response, so our enemies are avoiding that, instead slowly ratcheting the terror upward in stages, stages aided by the obstruction and divisive policies of the democrat's hate-filled party of factious constituencies. Perhaps that's what the Saudis and Jordanians realize and with our slow demise they see the eventual evaporation of their power in their own country. Fanatical Islamism is a real threat to the les fanatical ruel of the Hashemite and Saudi rules (despite what you may believe about Wahhabism). Perhaps that's why they are now working to stop these maniacs also. The realities are starting to sink in.

47 posted on 01/18/2003 8:38:12 AM PST by MHGinTN (Manama na, meep meep maneemie, manama na, meep mee menie ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

les = less

ruel = rule

Sorry, this screed just popped out withour thorough review.

48 posted on 01/18/2003 8:39:36 AM PST by MHGinTN (Manama na, meep meep maneemie, manama na, meep mee menie ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

withour = without ... need more coffee so fingers walk better.
49 posted on 01/18/2003 8:40:46 AM PST by MHGinTN (Manama na, meep meep maneemie, manama na, meep mee menie ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
These are some real sick puppies. They have declared war on an entire people and we've sought revenge against only the perpetrators. That would change of course the minute they introduce nuclear or biological into the equation. At that point, we could no longer afford to sort the good guys from the bad. We would have to eliminate the entire region, and we would most certainly do so.
50 posted on 01/18/2003 8:51:08 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
My freind, they have already introduced biologicals into the equation, by trying to kill Americans with Anthrax. It is the sort of oozing assault described above.
51 posted on 01/18/2003 9:13:46 AM PST by MHGinTN (Manama na, meep meep maneemie, manama na, meep mee menie ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"No big trick to that, what with the thousands of uninspected maritime cargo containers delivered to our seaports each month."

It depends. There is always the one in a million chance that customs will stop and inspect the freighter carrying the nuke, just as they did that other freighter off the coast of NYC several months back. For all we know, this strategy may already have been tried and the feds intercepted and disarmed a nuclear warhead intended to destroy New York City.

Since al-Qaeda is at this point dependant upon their state sponsors to manufacture such weapons for them. The general public has, in all honesty, nothing more than a crude idea of the group's capabilities at this point depending on what countries we know sponsors them (Iran, Iraq, Sudan, ect.) is willing to loan them.
52 posted on 01/18/2003 10:32:41 AM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Ping
53 posted on 01/18/2003 10:50:57 AM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare; MHGinTN; JimRed; Bikers4Bush; Highest Authority; Dog; swarthyguy; Fudd; Sender; ...
The website that the al-qaeda nuclear threat appeared on - al-mojahedoon.net -- has just been "nuked".
54 posted on 01/18/2003 6:03:10 PM PST by JohnathanRGalt (---- Fight Islamist CyberTerror at: http://haganah.org.il/haganah/index.php ----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *JIHAD IN AMERICA; eastsider; akash; Angelus Errare; ex-Texan; Bobibutu; Bad~Rodeo; Abar; Huggy; ...

Jehadi website ping: (let me know if you want on or off)

The website al-mojahedoon.net is threatening America with nuclear terror (However, it appears that the website has just been "nuked" out of cyberspace ).

55 posted on 01/18/2003 6:10:18 PM PST by JohnathanRGalt (---- Fight Islamist CyberTerror at: http://haganah.org.il/haganah/index.php ----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Depressing situation. They got away with 9/11, they'll get away with a bio attack, they'll get away with a nuke attack.. And we'll just falter more and more.

Got away with? That's an interesting perspective. We take 3,000 casualties, they lose a country, soon to be two countries, get their financial umbilical cords cut, face a global manhunt, and have no real prospect of getting back on their feet. At prices like these, no one can afford terrorism in the long run. Do the math.

Sure, we could have nuked Afghanistan. That would have created far more problems than it solved, and wasnt' necessary in the first place. An eye for an eye and a nuke for a nuke, sure, but nuking everyone who pulls off a suicide hijacking or bus bombing is foolish overkill.

56 posted on 01/18/2003 6:20:23 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
I believe in hitting back at least 100 times harder. We should've used B61's or SLBM's on the islamic world that night.
57 posted on 01/18/2003 6:24:56 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Just as fundamentalist Christians shouldn't be cause for destroying Christianity, fundamentalist Muslims shouldn't be cause for destroying Islam. I haven't always felt this way, but I finally figured it out.
Bad Example. Fundamentalist Christians are the ones who are obeying what it says in spreading the Gospel, and teaching the Church to obey God's word.

Muslim clerics are teaching their people to hate...

Hate, and then some:

"I will make my body a bomb," said the boy, "that will blast the flesh of Zionists, the sons of pigs and monkeys.... I will tear their bodies into little pieces and will cause them more pain than they will ever know."  His classmates shouted in response, "Allah Akhbar," [God is great] and his teacher shouted, "May the virgins give you pleasure."    Islam Unveiled, Robert Spencer cites Jack Kelley's article in USA Today describing the latter's visit to a school run by Hamas... an eleven year old boy reported this to his class.
The term "fundamentalist" isn't a loop hole for the Religion of Peace... it's absolutely forbidden to be non-fundamentalist in Islam.    That's why fatwahs are issued... that's why muhammadens utilize pseudonyms whenever they risk criticizing Islam.    When was the last time a Christian fundementalist hid their name from their brothers in faith?

58 posted on 01/18/2003 7:10:52 PM PST by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JohnathanRGalt
Thanks for the ping <G>:

Yo, nuke guys...

Like I said last year, you must first have:

Got that?? Let's see...you want to use bio warfare, but have thus far failed miserably...now you want to kill all of us?? Who's gonna be left to administer Sha'Ria law...a COCK ROACH???? DUHHHHH!!!!

LOL!!

Dorks.

59 posted on 01/18/2003 8:31:52 PM PST by cake_crumb (What would we do without FR? Don't wait to find out. Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"My freind, they have already introduced biologicals into the equation, by trying to kill Americans with Anthrax. It is the sort of oozing assault described above"

Horrible for the families of the people who died...but in a population of 300,000,000, what dent did the few poor people who died make? Remember...the Enemy was trying to cripple the nation. Do we see visions of The Stand?

Has the mail been interrupted (don't I wish...my future son in-law got jury duty questionairres from TWO different counties - one of which he obviously doesn't live in this weekend...now we have to starighten out a few low-rent bureaucrats in TWO counties about WHICH county he lives in...one thought he lived at our daughter's address...HERE)?

Nope...if this is the best they've got...OH...along with that mysterious stomach bug people have been getting at sea for the past half century...they've failed miserably.

60 posted on 01/18/2003 8:41:06 PM PST by cake_crumb (What would we do without FR? Don't wait to find out. Become a monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson