Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: conservativecorner
The White Needs to grow some effin' balls and point out the Hildebeast administrations capituations to terrorists over the years and how their dropping of the ball after the 1993 WTC incident led directly to the 2001 attack.
To: All
3 posted on
01/25/2003 6:34:12 AM PST by
backhoe
To: conservativecorner
If Hill-the-Beast is taking those kinds of shots at Bush, you'd better believe that her focus groups have told her it's safe. Which means that the Left is becoming emboldened in its anti-American agenda, even after 9/11. Apparently, the patina of patriotism has worn off, exposing the base metal underneath.
I for one never believed it at all. Hearing Ted Kennedy or Tom Daschle sing "God Bless America" only made me want to retch.
4 posted on
01/25/2003 6:35:45 AM PST by
IronJack
To: conservativecorner
Hillary Mistress of Darkness.
8 posted on
01/25/2003 6:47:13 AM PST by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary?.......Me neither....)
To: conservativecorner
She may have pledged not to run in 2004, but she is already campaigning---and intends to be the Democratic nominee in 2004 [unless GWB's polls are extremely high]. Her goal---another rout of a popular, war-winning, sitting President and Bush deseated by a Clinton.
10 posted on
01/25/2003 6:50:01 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: conservativecorner
Let's see, why don't we throw that nasty little cudan boy out of the country, but those guy's over there in the flight school can stay. Thank you, hillB
To: conservativecorner
If, G-d forbid, there is another 9/11, she can say "See, I warned you."
That's what this is all about.
15 posted on
01/25/2003 6:54:26 AM PST by
ricpic
To: conservativecorner
"Somewhere along the line, we lost our edge. We let our guard down." Gee, do you s'pose it could've been when Monica had her head buried in your husband's lap?
16 posted on
01/25/2003 6:56:31 AM PST by
ncpastor
To: conservativecorner
That's our "Hillaroid". Always a big pain in the ***.
Really though, why do we tolerate this absolute hypocrite to any degree whatsoever? Surely with her brand of bovine intelligence she would find herself at home in any pasture. We should do our best to ensure we put her out there the next election.
18 posted on
01/25/2003 6:57:00 AM PST by
Caipirabob
([Formerly: Yakboy] Democrat.. Socialist..Commie..Traitor...Who can tell the difference?)
To: conservativecorner
"Will ending the tax on dividends save one police officer or firefighter his job?" she asked. Will imposing Universal Health Care save one police officer or firefighter his job?
Sheesh...comparing apples to ducks.
19 posted on
01/25/2003 6:57:18 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: conservativecorner
She is just trying to get elected President. Look at all the anti war protests going on. Just like the 60's and you know where Hill was in the 60's. On every side; but America's. Also, remember the Demorats came into power and what a disaster that was. If we have learned anything, people like Hillary and Bill Clinton can only spell disaster for the United States.
To: conservativecorner
GO HILLY GO!!!!
To: conservativecorner
The following is the New York Post's editorial reply to the bitch:
MRS. CLINTON'S MYTH
January 25, 2003 -- Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday delivered herself of a blistering attack on the Bush administration's nation al-security policy:
"Time has passed and our vigilance has faded," claimed New York's junior senator. "We have relied on a myth of homeland security - a myth written in rhetoric, inadequate resources and a new bureaucracy, instead of relying on good, old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle."
Hmmm. What to make of that?
Well, not to visit the sins of the husband on the wife - okay, maybe a little bit - but let the record show that the first attack on the World Trade Center took place in 1993, two months into the Clinton co-presidency.
And, as Rep. Peter King (R-Long Island) noted yesterday, "[After the first attack], nobody from the Clinton administration, including the president himself, ever even came to New York to visit the site, and they did nothing from 1993 until they left office to protect New York."
The contrast with the current administration couldn't be more stark.
For the record also shows that the previous administration did little to respond to subsequent attacks on U.S. interests: the Khobar Towers marine barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1995, the two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998, USS Cole in Yemen in 2000.
Again, contrast that with the current administration's response - both in Afghanistan and across the world in the broader war on terror.
Certainly looks like "old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle" to us. But what about the "new bureaucracy" that Mrs. Clinton so scathingly condemns?
Well, first, it was the Democrats who got out in front and demanded the creation of a Department of Homeland Security - and then blocked it for months afterwards in a happily failed attempt to lard up that bureaucracy with union-protecting language.
Sen. Clinton has, as the saying goes, a right to her opinion. What she doesn't have is a right to her own set of facts.
And the fact is, the previous administration - in which she held a significant behind-the-scenes role, and from which her current position devolves - failed to respond forcefully enough when American interests were attacked, both at home and abroad.
The Democratic Party, as a whole, has scant standing to criticize the efforts of the current administration regarding national security.
Mrs. Clinton, individually, has none.
NY Post Editorial
35 posted on
01/25/2003 7:34:17 AM PST by
NY Cajun
To: conservativecorner
This woman is a reincarnation of Cleopatra, I swear it's true. As we all know Cleopatra takes poison rather than let her enemies capture her.
To: conservativecorner
"It's like inviting the enemy to try another attack."The yellowdog partisans of the RAT cult would love nothing more. They are so bent on regaining power that they hope and would gladly trade thousands of dead Americans for control of the government. Life (except for their own of course) is of no value to them.
38 posted on
01/25/2003 7:42:29 AM PST by
DaBroasta
(Make the retroactive abortion of NARAL members legal)
To: conservativecorner
The SKANK say's President Bush hasn't done enough since Sept 11th? Well B**ch,there hasn't been anymore attacks has there? If your low-life husband had done he's job(not blow job) there might not have been an attack!
39 posted on
01/25/2003 7:42:32 AM PST by
ohiobushman
(HEY CLINTONS,"JUST F'N GO AWAY"!!!!!)
To: philetus
Ping!
To: conservativecorner
Hillary is the kind of whore who gives whore's a bad name.
42 posted on
01/25/2003 8:02:19 AM PST by
mcenedo
To: conservativecorner
Best way to defeat terrorism is to take them out and put them on the defensive which is exactly what Bush is doing .
44 posted on
01/25/2003 8:50:25 AM PST by
uncbob
To: conservativecorner
This ingnorant woman needs to shut her trap. She's a disgrace.
45 posted on
01/25/2003 8:52:57 AM PST by
Lucky2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson