Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam has authorized use of mass destruction weapons - US defense official
Northern Light via intellnet.org ^ | Feb. 9, 2003 | AFX News Asia

Posted on 02/09/2003 8:52:05 AM PST by FairOpinion

CAIRO (AFX) - President Saddam Hussein has given the green light for the use of weapons of mass destruction if a war is declared against Iraq, a senior US defense official said in remarks published here Sunday.

In case of war, the United States was looking to reduce the danger to civilians as well as protect strategic oil wells, he said.

"We know that Saddam Hussein has given a green light to his officers to use weapons of mass destruction ... and we think he possesses biological weapons," Peter Rodman, assistance secretary of defense, told the official Arabic-language Al-Ahram newspaper in an interview.

Asked whether the United States would strike back with similar weapons, Rodman, whose remarks were translated, refused to specify.

"I do not want to say anything precise, but President (George) W. Bush circulated a document, a few months ago, about weapons of mass destruction. We reserve the right to respond with overwhelming forces, of our own choice."

"We are prepared, we are getting ready for the worst, but we are also preparing for victory, under all circumstances," he said.

But, he added, "all this is hypothetical, because President Bush has not yet taken a decision" on war.

Rodman said one of the key US aims in a possible war was to reduce the dangers facing the Iraqi civilian population and key infrastructures, especially oil wells.

Military plans include provisions to "diminish the danger facing the population and infrastructures," he said.

"We want to protect oil wells. Saddam Hussein is perhaps aiming to destroy the economic structures in the country, but we will do our best to prevent him from doing that."

The US defense official said Washington wanted to wage the war in a "fast and efficient manner," and added that if Saddam "wants to start the war, he will make things easier" for us.

"If he starts it, we will finish it," he said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; massdestruction; saddam; war; warlist; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Saddam authorized the use the weapons of mass destruction he claims he doesn't have.
1 posted on 02/09/2003 8:52:05 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This story came out a couple of days ago, although a lot of mainstream news outlets have been slow to pick up on it.
2 posted on 02/09/2003 8:57:07 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I am sure that if a Mexican-Chinese invasion force tried to take over our country the president would authorize the use of all kinds of bio and chemical weapons 'we do not have'. One problem with the current Iraq policy is that Saddam is in a corner and desperate.
3 posted on 02/09/2003 8:58:07 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 02/09/2003 9:00:57 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
This story came out a couple of days ago, although a lot of mainstream news outlets have been slow to pick up on it.
----

I know, I was considering whether or not to post it, but I think this article is updated news, in that a US official officially confirms that news.
5 posted on 02/09/2003 9:01:25 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Why wouldn't Saddam use his WMD? Of course he will.
6 posted on 02/09/2003 9:03:26 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
"I am sure that if a Mexican-Chinese invasion force tried to take over our country the president would authorize the use of all kinds of bio and chemical weapons 'we do not have'"
----
I doubt that you are correct. You appear to imply that there is a moral equivalence between the US and Iraq, which is totally wrong, for reasons too obvious and too numerous to mention.

"One problem with the current Iraq policy is that Saddam is in a corner and desperate."

Are you trying to imply that Saddam is justified, and that somehow it's going to be our fault, that "we are forcing him" into using WMD?

7 posted on 02/09/2003 9:04:58 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
No problem. The media has been really slow to report on this, so I don't see a problem with posting it again.
8 posted on 02/09/2003 9:06:15 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Yep. Those same WMD that he claims he ain't got...
9 posted on 02/09/2003 9:07:19 AM PST by mhking ("The home team Iraqis have won the toss and elected to receive...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
He will use these WMD on his own people...and say that it was the USA. Do not be shocked...if Baghdad is nuked by his own hands.
10 posted on 02/09/2003 9:07:56 AM PST by Lucas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Yes, I'm implying that giving Saddam no choice but to be desperate is nothing but encouraging him to be at his worst. Accusing them of intending to do desperate things is just a tiny bit hypocritical

Any head of state who's not a limp worm would do whatever he can to defend his nation. (After all, Saddam may not be 'the French'). We WOULD use nukes and whatever else if attacked and saw no other way and even if we did see another way but found nukes to be a more expeditious way out (see Hiroshima) and so would others.
11 posted on 02/09/2003 9:11:47 AM PST by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"We know that Saddam Hussein has given a green light to his officers to use weapons of mass destruction

President's Radio Address

February 8, 2003

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Powell briefed the United Nations Security Council on Iraq's illegal weapons program, its attempts to hide those weapons, and its links to terrorist groups.

The Iraqi regime's violations of Security Council Resolutions are evident, they are dangerous to America and the world, and they continue to this hour.

The regime has never accounted for a vast arsenal of deadly, biological and chemical weapons. To the contrary, the regime is pursuing an elaborate campaign to conceal its weapons materials and to hide or intimidate key experts and scientists. This effort of deception is directed from the highest levels of the Iraqi regime, including Saddam Hussein, his son, Iraq's vice president and the very official responsible for cooperating with inspectors.

The Iraqi regime has actively and secretly attempted to obtain equipment needed to produce chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Firsthand witnesses have informed us that Iraq has at least seven mobile factories for the production of biological agents -- equipment mounted on trucks and rails to evade discovery.

The Iraqi regime has acquired and tested the means to deliver weapons of mass destruction. It has never accounted for thousands of bombs and shells capable of delivering chemical weapons. It is actively pursuing components for prohibited ballistic missiles. And we have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.

One of the greatest dangers we face is that weapons of mass destruction might be passed to terrorists who would not hesitate to use those weapons. Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to terrorist networks. Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. And an al Qaeda operative was sent to Iraq several times in the late 1990s for help in acquiring poisons and gases.

We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in Baghdad.

This is the situation as we find it -- 12 years after Saddam Hussein agreed to disarm and more than 90 days after the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous vote. Saddam Hussein was required to make a full declaration of his weapons programs. He has not done so. Saddam Hussein was required to fully cooperate in the disarmament of his regime. He has not done so. Saddam Hussein was given a final chance. He is throwing away that chance.

Having made its demands, the Security Council must not back down when those demands are defied and mocked by a dictator. The United States would welcome and support a new resolution making clear that the Security Council stands behinds its previous demands. Yet, resolutions mean little without resolve. And the United States, along with a growing coalition of nations, will take whatever action is necessary to defend ourselves and disarm the Iraqi regime.

Thank you for listening.

END

12 posted on 02/09/2003 9:12:13 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (An American Fellowship of Freedom loving Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
But, he said he doesn't have WMD. How can this be??????
13 posted on 02/09/2003 9:16:08 AM PST by Indy Pendance (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucas1
He will use these WMD on his own people...and say that it was the USA. Do not be shocked...if Baghdad is nuked by his own hands.

I agree. Didn't he say something similar at first about the oil wells in GWI?

14 posted on 02/09/2003 9:17:46 AM PST by Indy Pendance (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
  
15 posted on 02/09/2003 9:24:20 AM PST by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Radiological poisoning -- a "dirty bomb" only without the bomb. Saddam can spread radioactive compounds over oil aread or Baghdad. A dustcloud of Anthrax over the city? Nerve agents? What will we do in retailiation if SADDAM poisons Baghdad? Nuke Baghdad? Well, maybe Tikrit, but I suspect that we will not be able to retailiate with WMD except perhaps in a symbolic way, like an isolated "presidential site."
16 posted on 02/09/2003 9:32:28 AM PST by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I doubt that you are correct. You appear to imply that there is a moral equivalence between the US and Iraq, which is totally wrong

He's exactly correct.

If an overwhelming sized army rolled across our Southern border, we'd throw everything we had at them, biologicals, chemical, neutron...

I'd be yelling from the rooftops for them to do so, too.

17 posted on 02/09/2003 9:50:47 AM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: DAnconia55
If an overwhelming sized army rolled across our Southern border, we'd throw everything we had at them, biologicals, chemical, neutron...

Yea like the chinese? because most of the mexicans are already here!

19 posted on 02/09/2003 9:55:08 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (An American Fellowship of Freedom loving Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Why wouldn't Saddam use his WMD? Of course he will."

Saddam does not have his literal finger on the proverbial trigger for the WMD's. It is up to his lieutenants to actually fire the weapons. That is why we have been sending messages to the troops that they, or more likely their glowing corpses, will be tried as war criminals if they dare to follow Saddam's orders to use these weapons.

I pray our warnings succeed.

20 posted on 02/09/2003 10:27:07 AM PST by Boss_Jim_Gettys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson