Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chivalry Linked to Sexist Views of Women
Yahoo! ^ | 2/11/2003 | Jacqueline Stenson

Posted on 02/11/2003 9:27:41 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
"Sexist Republican Pig! How dare you hold that door for me!!!"
1 posted on 02/11/2003 9:27:41 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
This is crap.
2 posted on 02/11/2003 9:28:57 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
There really is no winning is there?
3 posted on 02/11/2003 9:30:25 AM PST by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Oy vey.

Shoot me now...
4 posted on 02/11/2003 9:32:11 AM PST by Mr. Thorne (Where's the global warming?! I'm cold NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I agree. Why do we feed these people?
5 posted on 02/11/2003 9:32:26 AM PST by boxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The fact that there was public money lying around to fund a study like this is depressing.
6 posted on 02/11/2003 9:32:48 AM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The participants reporting high support for chivalry gave more favorable ratings to homemakers and less favorable ratings to career women ... suggesting that chivalrous men ... disapprove of women who ... are high in competence

I think this whole thing is stupid. The above "logical" chain of supposition on the part of the researcher really shows that they are pushing an agenda and grasping at straws to do so.

7 posted on 02/11/2003 9:33:52 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Radical feminists have protested against having doors held for them for at least thirty years. And now this guy does a study--well funded with tax money, no doubt--to confirm it.

One more instance of a researcher finding what he wanted to find in the first place. Besides, if he had found anything else, he would never get another research grant or promotion.

Politically correct scholars are little better than lemmings.
8 posted on 02/11/2003 9:34:32 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
...disapprove of women ...who are low in virtue.

What?! Dissapprove of somebody's lack of virtue? How unenlightened. Next thing you know, people will start to approve of virtue. That could lead to standards of behavior, which could lead to intact families, which could lead to well-adjusted children, which could lead to a decrease in the need for counseling, which could lead to the unemployment of professors of psychology.

9 posted on 02/11/2003 9:35:15 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"The soft chivalry of low expectations"
10 posted on 02/11/2003 9:37:37 AM PST by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
LOS ANGELES (Reuters Health) - Chivalry isn't all it's cracked up to be, suggests new research showing that men who hold doors for women also tend to hold sexist views about them.

Heaven knows I do! I haven't gotten many complaints about it in my time, either.

11 posted on 02/11/2003 9:38:36 AM PST by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves; dead; TomServo; Texaggie79; weikel
What do you tell a woman with two black eyes?

Nothing, you already told her twice!

;-)

12 posted on 02/11/2003 9:40:03 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Destroying the last vestiges of culture and civility, that's what this is all about...
13 posted on 02/11/2003 9:40:29 AM PST by Junior (I stole your tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
http://spruce.flint.umich.edu/~altermat/

T. William Altermatt, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Michigan-Flint
411 Murchie Science Building
303 East Kearsley Street
Flint, MI 48502

altermat@umflint.edu
(810) 762-3468


14 posted on 02/11/2003 9:42:03 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
Yup, I hold doors for them too, and the elderly, and anyone who is close to the door so that it does not slam in their face. where in the survey do I fit.

Women, I belive with all my heart that they are different in important ways from men. Oh yes, and some are pretty, some are smart, some are...
15 posted on 02/11/2003 9:44:46 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Fine. I'm a sexist. So what?
16 posted on 02/11/2003 9:46:28 AM PST by B-Chan (Ad Astra Per Ardua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
I remember being in NJ on business and when I would hold the doors (like I always do), the women would give me the evil eye, like I was insulting them. Not that I needed another reason to hate it up north.
17 posted on 02/11/2003 9:46:48 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
Women, I belive with all my heart that they are different in important ways from men.

Viva La Difference!

18 posted on 02/11/2003 9:47:50 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The belief that women are less competent and powerful than men explained both chivalry --that women must be protected and provided for by men--and sexist beliefs that women are not qualified for high-power positions, the researchers concluded.

There is so much to dissect here - I am really angry about this crap. These sick sexually confused people should not get a PENNY of public money. The feminist agenda is ruining families and millions of lives. I know. I was in Berkely at one of the first "women's liberation" meeetings in 68 or 69.

Feminazis are angry, lesbian, hateful bitches who want to destroy God's natural order. It is very very sad and dangerous that this kind of horse s**t is being crammed down kids' throats in school and media. Girls nowadays - and boys - are indoctrinated with this psychotic nonsense. "Feminism" means: Women have the right to be (and should be) sluts, they should be lesbians, and they must hate men. They must have abortions, and the result is millions of bastard children. And men can have sex any old time with any woman and feel no repsonsibility. After all, why keep a cow at home when you can buy milk in the market? I really hate this c*p.

No wonder kids are totally confused and can't form relationships. They don't know what a normal marriage looks like.

Why can't they see that men and women have different psychologies and different roles? Answer: they want to detroy society since they are envious of the Creator.

19 posted on 02/11/2003 9:49:21 AM PST by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I remember being in NJ on business and when I would hold the doors (like I always do), the women would give me the evil eye, like I was insulting them.

I have never in my life gotten a bad reaction from a woman for holding a door, or for any other act of chivalry. (Being ruggedly handsome has its advantages!)

20 posted on 02/11/2003 9:50:41 AM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ; -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson