Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish lawmakers threaten walk-out over reference to Jesus
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 3, 2003 | Diana Lynne

Posted on 04/03/2003 6:25:58 PM PST by honway

A Maryland minister was barred from giving the opening prayer in the state Senate after he refused to drop a reference to Jesus.

The Rev. David N. Hughes of the Trinity and Evangelical Church of Adamstown, Md., intended to round out his invocation yesterday with the line, "In Jesus' name, Amen." But the sergeant at arms – on the orders of Senate President Thomas Mike Miller Jr. – shut the reverend out of the body's chambers.

Miller issued the orders after two Jewish lawmakers threatened to stage a boycott of the legislative session if the phrase was not removed.

"I'm shocked by the response. I've never had this happen in 26 years," Hughes told the Frederick News-Post. "It just makes me feel that they've taken away my right as an American to pray, and this is the seat of government, and that's scary."

The pastor – a Vietnam veteran – was invited to give the prayer by Republican Sen. Alex Mooney. Hughes was Mooney's fourth guest. The other three were Jewish rabbis.

Opening up legislative sessions with prayer is a longstanding tradition in Maryland, as it is in states across the country. Mooney told WorldNetDaily no one had been barred from giving an invocation before. He sees irony in yesterday's "censorship."

Maryland state Republican Rep. Alex Mooney

"We were the first state to address religious tolerance in our state charter," he told WorldNetDaily. "This just shows a lack of tolerance for peoples' religious views."

Mooney recalled numerous instances of invocations referencing Jesus throughout the four years that he has been in office.

But at the beginning of the session this year, a string of invocations by Baptist preachers invoking the name Jesus Christ sparked debate on the issue. Miller appealed to lawmakers for tolerance and urged they stick to guidelines that call for invocations to be of an ecumenical nature and respectful of all faiths.

Webster's New World Dictionary defines ecumenical as "promoting cooperation or better understanding among differing religious faiths."

Since the debate, the Senate clerk screens prayers ahead of time and flagged the written text submitted by Hughes.

When Sens. Ida Ruben and Gloria Hollinger – both of whom are Jewish – heard of the reference, they asked Mooney to strike it.

"I said, 'Hey, I'll let him pray however he wants to pray. I'm not going to censor him and tell him how he needs to pray,'" Mooney told WND.

Ruben told the Frederick News-Post she then urged Hughes to substitute "messiah" for Jesus, telling him the reference could offend non-Christians and goes against the guidelines.

Neither Ruben nor Miller returned calls seeking comment.

"This is part of my faith," Hughes responded, according to Mooney. "The Gospel says when you pray, pray in Jesus' name."

The senators next asked to be excused from the floor during the prayer.

Paradoxically, a walk-out over a Muslim cleric's prayer opening a Washington state legislative session last month backfired on one Christian lawmaker.

Washington state Republican Rep. Lois McMahan

As WorldNetDaily reported, Rep. Lois McMahan, a Republican from Gig Harbor, Wash., refused to participate in the prayer and declared, "My god is not Muhammed."

"The Islamic religion is so ... part and parcel with the attack on America. I just didn't want to be there, be a part of that," she said in an interview with the Seattle Post Intelligencer. "Even though the mainstream Islamic religion doesn't profess to hate America, nonetheless it spawns the groups that hate America."

But a day later, McMahan apologized on the floor of the state House of Representatives amid mounting furor over her stance.

Debate over invocations is raging elsewhere in the country. As WorldNetDaily reported, several Southern California cities are grappling with threats from both sides of the issue.

Under pressure from the American Civil Liberties Union to quit using the name Jesus Christ in invocations, the city of Lake Elsinore, in Riverside County, decided to eliminate mention of "religious figures." The decree subsequently had the apparent effect of eliminating the prayer altogether, as no local pastors would accept invitations to deliver the prayer, and city councilors adopted moments of silence instead.

The ACLU contends that praying at the request of a government entity is a violation of the First Amendment's prohibition against the establishment of religion.

But the nonprofit United States Justice Foundation, which threatened to sue the city if it failed to reverse its decision, maintains telling a pastor what to pray is a violation of his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion.

The notion of "separation of church and state" is derived from the dissenting opinion of the 1946 Supreme Court case Everson vs. Board of Education, which upheld a program allowing parents to be repaid from state funds for the costs of transportation to private religious schools. The court required only that the state maintain neutrality in its relations with various groups of religious believers.

"The decision in Everson does not rise to the level of being a battle cry for those who would wish to remove every vestige of religion from the public forum," USJF litigation counsel Richard Ackerman asserts.

"There's a push in this country to remove religion from society," Mooney echoed, "from the Supreme Court's decision on the Pledge to the ACLU going after all the Ten Commandments posted across the country. ... Nothing in the church-state relationship allows censorship and the removal of religious values from society."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christians; ecumenical; hypocrites; jews; liberals; maryland; silliness; watereddown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 861-872 next last
To: AnalogReigns
Makes sense to me. I had 2 thoughts to reading this article:

The first was, let'um walk out. So what? If their conscience is bothered by being in attendance while someone prays to Jesus, then by all means, they should vacate the premises. I suspect it had less to do with their conscience though, and more to do with wanting to get in a zinger against Christians.

My second thought was that for those who advocate the Christian minister dropping the Jesus reference, out of respect for those who were in attendance -- would they also encourage a Muslim or Jewish religious leader to INCLUDE a reference to Jesus, out of respect for those Christians in attendance? Of course not. So whereas this particular Christian minister felt a moral obligation to "pray in Jesus' name", per his own faith, he is forced to abdicate that, against his own conscience --- however, others of differing faiths are not held to the same standard.

What it boils down to is the same old tired practice that has become fashionable in America -- when it doubt, stick it to the Christians.
481 posted on 04/03/2003 10:51:26 PM PST by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
You might offend

That's just it. What possible kind of prayer can anyone come up with that isn't going to possibly going to offend someone? If you mention Jesus, you'll offend non-Christians, if you say God instead of Gods, you could offend Hindus and pantheists and pagans. If you refer to God as a "he", you offend the feminists. If you even say "God" or "gods" you'll offend the atheists and agnostics ---and if you say anything about God being good, you'll offend the Satanists.

482 posted on 04/03/2003 10:52:50 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Why is it is possible for thousands of chaplains, ministers and priests to find prayers that are Christian and yet to do alienate other denomination of Cristianity, Jews, Muslims, or Hindu? As I said on this thread before, I myself participated in many inter-religiosu services, and has never had any problems. Were the priests adn ministers officiating there selling out Christianity? Nonsense

It comes down to this...I believe a Christian has the right to make a Christian prayer EVEN in public. If a Rabbi had said " in the Messiah's name, we say "Amen"", I would not join in (as he is speaking to, about, a being which I have no interaction with) but I wouldn't be offended and assume that Jews were the only people he was including in his prayer.

As long as there are opportunities for Jewish prayer, Christian prayer, Muslim prayer, whatever prayer, I think we are being fair and inclusive of all peoples and THAT is what our Constitution compells us to do. It isn't clear in this case that there are any Jewish led invocations at all. THAT is wrong, IMO. If all types of religions cannot be represented then it is wrong to represent ONLY one.

483 posted on 04/03/2003 10:55:57 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Beleive me, I have no sympathy for the Leftists --- whether they are from Christian or Jewish families. But these people did not walk out from other prayers; the prayers are routinely said in Congress and no one walks out. I am just trying to live by the Commandments: I have no evidence to accuse, so I give the benefit of the doubt.

Most importantly, I tried to explain to many people on this thread that they are, in contrast to you (you can't even get the word "perhaps" out of them; they are sure), are fighting against the strawman. That is, they (I) choose to interpret the situation in a negative way, (ii) take offense, (iii) and accuse. Here I failed miserably: you can't make them think that maybe --- just maybe --- there might be another explanation here. Nope! It's an assault of Christianity. Never mind the facts, that this very same function is performed day in and day out in our Congress and armed forces without any problem --- even from the Leftists. Those d-mn Jews, the trouble-makers.

484 posted on 04/03/2003 10:58:02 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Exactly.
485 posted on 04/03/2003 10:59:05 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: DensaMensa
"'In Jesus Name' is a STANDARD closure to any Christian prayer and has nothing to do with 'emphasizing differences'. Think about it. Why should any Christian cleric change theology just to make you feel good?"

Because many of our Freeper friends have unknowingly been infested with, and fallen prey to the same PC BS they have purportedly vowed to derisively scorn.

486 posted on 04/03/2003 10:59:41 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
Neither would I demand that HE change the way he prays. And that is what most on this thread refuse to see: no one is asking him to change the way he prays.

WHat one questions is how he leads others in prayer.

487 posted on 04/03/2003 11:00:03 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
So, for Christians who recite the Lord's Prayer, it goes nowhere? The Lord's Prayer does not have "Jesus" anywhere in it.

C'mon Bella_Bru! Think before you type! JESUS is the One who *GAVE* us the Lord's Prayer when His disciples asked how they should pray to GOD. Can you understand now how idiotic your statement is?
488 posted on 04/03/2003 11:01:05 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Don't be an ass.

This isn't ancient Jerusalem and I don't speak Arameic or Hebrew and I don't feel that either is germane to my having a positon concerning my expresion of my belief.

I live in America and I don't have to embrace other cultures to know they aren't mine and are not for me. Believe as you will, but don't expect me to kiss your ass because you aren't pleased by my views.

In short if you want tolerance, get a mircometer.
489 posted on 04/03/2003 11:02:02 PM PST by Rasputin_TheMadMonk (Yes I am a bastard, but I'm a free, white, gun owning bastard. Just ask my exwife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: so_real
The poster said a prayer without Jesus in it goes nowhere.
490 posted on 04/03/2003 11:03:34 PM PST by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
"Jesus said if you are ashamed of me before men, I will be ashamed of you before my Father."

Amen, sister...

Ooops. Will an 'amen' provoke shrieks of "insensitive" from the militant-ecumenism crowd?

491 posted on 04/03/2003 11:03:59 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Rasputin_TheMadMonk
Jews have been in the U.S. since before it was the U.S.. Sad to tell you, Jewish culture is part of American culture, and we are not going away.
492 posted on 04/03/2003 11:05:11 PM PST by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
"The Lord's Prayer does not have 'Jesus' anywhere in it."

No you're correct. But Jesus did author it.

493 posted on 04/03/2003 11:06:40 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
Christian prayer EVEN in public.

This is not the case; this is not a Christian saying a prayer in public. This is a person leading others in public.

If a minister at a youth service chooses very long, very deep prayers and requests 8-year-olds to follow him that would be deemed inappropriate. The members of the community would ask that he choose something more appropriate for the students' age. That would not be read as request to wather down Christianity, or affront on Christianity itself.

And it does amaze me: no matter how much you explicitly state that this is NOT the angle that bothers you, people on this thread see only one angle: an outsider is attacking Christianity.

Having spent several hours on this thread, I can now say that this reaction is simply pathetic. And scary.

494 posted on 04/03/2003 11:07:27 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee
The pastor was well within his right to refuse to compromise on the prayer.

Agreed. Any Christian minister who would compromise his prayer regarding Christ has no conviction. As farmer18 quoted in another post, "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." -- Matthew 10:33
495 posted on 04/03/2003 11:08:38 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I agree, and have tried to drop hints. They don't seem to get it. I am as strong as they in my belief that my prayers have to be made in the name of Jesus, but when they choose to interpret the situation in a negative way, (ii) take offense, (iii) and accuse. they do more harm than good. I want you to consider the Lord Jesus, not be repulsed by His followers.

I really believe that they mean well. Christians have been suffering alot lately from this PC stuff.
496 posted on 04/03/2003 11:11:01 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
WHat one questions is how he leads others in prayer.

He is saying a prayer out loud and I expect that he will pray in the manner he is accustomed.

I think it is offensive and arrogant that you want to dictate the words this man is allowed to say. NEVER would I be so disrespectful as to demand that a Catholic priest not mention Mary in a public prayer. Nor would I complain if a Rabbi mentioned his yet to come Messiah. It's called tolerance and it's a two way street.

497 posted on 04/03/2003 11:11:08 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BAmerican
My second thought was that for those who advocate the Christian minister dropping the Jesus reference, out of respect for those who were in attendance -- would they also encourage a Muslim or Jewish religious leader to INCLUDE a reference to Jesus, out of respect for those Christians in attendance?

Your thought has the following structure: "Would those who quit playing violin eat an apple instead? Of course not, so everyone should attend at least one year of college." Words that might belong together but do not.

When you are leading in prayer, this no longer your private prayer. If you are in a mixed company, you seek a common ground. If you pray to G-d, you do not jeopardize any of your Christian beliefs and remain on common ground with Christians of all denominations, Jews, Muslims, and Hindu.

It's very simple, actually.

498 posted on 04/03/2003 11:13:24 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
This is a person leading others in public.

You act as though someone is holding a baseball bat to your head and demanding that you betray your God. By your point of view, we ought never have any public leading of prayer at all. After all, any prayer at all is disrespectful of non-believers.

499 posted on 04/03/2003 11:14:28 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
LOL
500 posted on 04/03/2003 11:14:52 PM PST by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 861-872 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson