Posted on 08/07/2003 4:22:34 PM PDT by dead
WASHINGTON - U.S. investigators now believe that a hijacker in the cockpit aboard United Airlines Flight 93 instructed terrorist-pilot Ziad Jarrah to crash the jetliner into a Pennsylvania field because of a passenger uprising in the cabin.
This theory, based on the government's analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of insurgent passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane's controls.
The government's findings — laid out deep within the report on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that was sent to Congress last month — aim to resolve one of the enduring mysteries of the deadliest terror attacks in U.S. history: What happened in the final minutes aboard Flight 93?
The FBI strenuously maintains that its analysis does not diminish the heroism of passengers who — with the words "Let's roll" — apparently rushed down the airliner's narrow aisle to try to overtake the hijackers.
President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have regularly praised the courage of those aboard Flight 93, some of whom told family members by telephone they were planning to storm the cockpit.
"While no one will ever know exactly what transpired in the final minutes of Flight 93, every shred of evidence indicates this plane crashed because of the heroic actions of the passengers," FBI spokeswoman Susan Whitson said Thursday.
Thirty-three passengers, seven crew members and the four hijackers died.
Citing transcripts of the still-secret cockpit recordings, FBI Director Robert Mueller told congressional investigators in a closed briefing last year that, minutes before Flight 93 hit the ground, one of the hijackers "advised Jarrah to crash the plane and end the passengers' attempt to retake the airplane."
Jarrah is thought to have been the terrorist-pilot because he was the only of the four hijackers aboard known to have a pilot's license.
Mueller's description was disclosed in a brief passage far into the 858-page report to Congress. Previous statements by FBI and other government officials have been ambiguous about what occurred in the cockpit.
Mueller's explanation was based on the FBI's efforts to decipher the cacophonous sounds on the cockpit recorder and produce a comprehensive transcript, said one official, speaking only on condition of anonymity.
The FBI is convinced it may never know for certain what transpired in those final moments, but Mueller represented the information as the FBI's leading theory, this official said.
The same cockpit recording was played privately in April 2002 for family members of victims aboard Flight 93, and the FBI also provided them with its best effort at producing an understandable transcript.
Some family members indicated afterward they were led to believe that passengers used a food cart as a shield and successfully broke into the cockpit.
The FBI has been loath to publicly put forward a contradictory theory out of sensitivity to the families and because of uncertainty about what happened.
People who have heard the recording describe it as nearly indecipherable, containing static noises, cockpit alarms and wind interspersed with cries in English and Arabic. Near the end of the tape, sounds can be heard of breaking glass and crashing dishes — lending credence to the theory that passengers used the food cart to rush the jetliner's narrow aisle.
Separately, the data recorder showed the plane's wings rocking violently as the jet flew too low and too fast for safe flight.
Intelligence officials believe the likely target for Flight 93 was the White House, based on information from Abu Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaida terrorist leader in U.S. custody who is believed to have played a key role in organizing the Sept. 11 attacks.
Prosecutors have sought a U.S. judge's permission to play recordings from Flight 93 during the terrorism trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only defendant in a U.S. case prosecutors have directly tied to the attacks. Moussaoui is accused of conspiring with the hijackers.
The government has said it can link Moussaoui to Jarrah, using a telephone number found on a business card recovered at the Shanksville, Pa., crash site. Prosecutors believe the card belonged to Jarrah and that Moussaoui had called the same number.
Moussaoui has acknowledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida but says he was not involved in the attacks.
___
I don't consider it a myth and neither should you - no matter what, that plane went down when it did because the passengers did something. Had they done nothing and just sat there, God only knows how many 100s or thousands more would have died.
Especially if they're using a single source, which is not uncommon.
there are exactly ZERO major media stories saying those initial reports were wrong.
Unless they are actually called on their mistakes by an irate litigant who actually wins, most media outlets do not put out major stories saying, "Oh, BTW, we REALLY got stuff wrong."
It wasn't the FBI. It was local residents who THOUGHT it MAY be human remains.
From the article:
Absolutely correct. The aim of the bastards who hijacked the plane was to crash it into the White House. The passengers (knowingly, I believe, after speaking with relatives over their cell phones) took it upon themselves to stop that from happening, thus saving many lives on the ground.
Nobody believed me when I posted that I thought those silly stories about Jessica Lynch were a lot of crap. Turns out she was basically injured in a serious car accident after all.
You're wrong. Type "Flight 93 debris" in Google and you'll find plenty of articles describing debris up to eight miles from the crash site and a one ton piece of engine 2000 yards away.
There were major Arab media stories that the Jews were behind 9/11, and knew about it in advance. None of these were ever retracted.
So what?
No, not at all. I just think that there was some resistance on the plane, but it never got to the cockpit. The original story did smack of myth from the get-go. That they would put this to rest 2 years later isn't surprising. Thr truth is, sadly, that the americans on that plane were not effective in overtaking the controls of the plane.
The shoe bomber and an improvised explosive that killed a passenger over the Pacific are proof.
Could you post a link to prove that assertion? As I said before, I live only 20 miles from the site and I never heard of anything other than papers being found away from the crash site.
No newbie, I'm not. I drove the area around the crash site not long after and missed that "trail" you speak of.
"Failed" to do what?
the topic: PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION BAN- What exactly does it mean?
Guest for the evening is Bill Murray of the Family Research Council
PLUS – A call from McClintock Campaign Headquarters!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.