'New World Order' Quotes of Note [& Commentary]

Greater Things LDS (Mormon) website ^ | 25 JUN 2003; UPDATED 4 NOV 2007 | "AJ" ?aka? Sterlling D Allan

[Quix]

INDEED.

AMEN! AMEN!

THX. THX.

[Quix]

I wonder if she’s in the A O G church my teen pastor’s son pastors.

[Quix]

All;

Looks like there’s a Joel Rosenberg

EPICENTER WEBCAST CONFERENCE

25 JUNE 2010

http://www.joelrosenberg.com/

[imfleck]

All I said was that that you had too much coffee this morning.

I never said I knew anything about the subject. But now that you brought it up, I admit I don’t know ANYTHING about it. I read your article to enlighten myself. I won’t try that again.

[Quix]

LOL.

I’d rather you’d read the quotes of our globalist leaders.

Fair enough.

Have an overcoming and enlightening week.

[Cvengr]

Good post.

[Quix]

THX THX FOR YOUR KIND REPLY.

[Quix]

MORE GLOBALIST STUFF.

from:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread574885/pg1

posted on 24/5/2010 @ 20:31

Agenda 21 and the Gulf attack

http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/halliburton-snaps-up-boots-and-coots/19435689/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlPPFcy-3Vo

---

http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/Agenda21.pdf

‘It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people henceforth pledge their allegiance.’

President G.H.W.Bush addressing U.N. ‘92’ Rio Summit

‘Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced... a major shift in the priorities of both governments and idividuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. The shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be intergrated into individual and collective decision making at every level.’

---

http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/invent/images/uploads/echarter_english.pdf

‘The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments...’

Maurice Strong

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YCatox0Lxo&feature=PlayList&p=378553F04AED421E&playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1

‘My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments’-——Mikhail Gorbachev

‘The threat of enviromental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the new world order’-——Mikhail Gorbachev 1996

(Monetary & Economic Review page 5)

---

http://files.meetup.com/565296/TheFirstGlobalRevolution_text.pdf

‘In searching for a new enemey to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill... All these dangers are caused by human intervention...’

---

http://www.unep.ch/etb/publications/Green Economy/UNEP Policy Brief Eng.pdf

‘Moreover, governments are planning to deploy fiscal
resources on an unprecedented scale: at the time of writing, proposed fiscal stimulus packages totalled
around US$3.0 trillion globally’

---

For the record, I dont think this was an accident.

Now, is the oil leak part of ‘their’ plan and pushing through Agenda 21?

2/3’s of all Americans live on a coast. How many on the Gulf Coast and the East Coast?

Could they be doing this to make alot of people relocate not by Martial Law, at least openly, but through man made disaster?

Im sure I can find more stuff to link that would be damning, but I figure that was enough to get a decent discussion going about all this and how it might play into Agenda 21...

Thoughts?

---

[Quix]

Note this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2520488/posts

about 24 well known experts predicting econ collapse between July-Oct 2010

UTTER COLLAPSE.

[Joya]

Thx. Qx.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Quix]

and THANK YOU for your kind reply.

Do you have a guess as to why this is so . . . ?hard?

or uncomfortable or impossible for some well known FREEPERS to wrap their minds and understanding . . . or credulity around???

[Alamo-Girl]

I imagine most anything that can be considered a conspiracy theory is subject to ridicule and rejection on Free Republic.

The "cure" would be to put meat on the bones - organize and present the facts objectively, whether the facts support a particular theory or not, and then explain the theory.

This seemed to work on the DSL as we considered a number of theories concerning Waco, TWA800, al Dura, ChinaGate, WhiteWater, Brown etc.

[Quix]

Hmmmmmm.

Plausible.

I think that’s been done a LOT. I think the list of quotes is a big CHUNK of that.

Hasn’t seemed to scratch the surface of the biases against such FACTS.

It seems like the “conspiracy” label is all that’s sufficient to neurtralize thought and fair-mindedness on the topic.

I guess part of me is dubious that the huge amount of work to ‘DISPASSIONATE’ such a huge pile of facts would take to achieve what . . . a HINT of change on the part of the WILLFULLY STUBBORNLY BLIND?

Maybe I’m too pessimistic about it. Maybe I’ve been burned at the stake too much over it.

I’d be VERY interested in END TIMES list members’ thoughts on those issues.

[LibertyRocks]

Perhaps it is not so much the ‘meat’ that’s not there, or presented. Perhaps it is truly a case of the subject title needing to be changed in order to get people to look with fresh eyes? The term ‘New World Order’ has been so linked with the ‘conspiracy’ mantle that maybe that is what’s getting in the way???

I don’t have suggestions at the moment on how to counter this, but I’ll think on it for a while and let you know if I have any ideas on how to broach the subject subtly and without perking up the “conspiracy” label so quickly...

I truly do think it’s a case of where the enemy has already framed the issue, and made it’s ‘judgement’ on this topic years ago and hence it’s entered the ‘common knowledge’ area of public discussion AS a ‘conspiracy theory’ to begin with. The fact that more and more things are happening to point out that this is a TRUTH and not a fantasy doesn’t phase most people because they are already blinded by the label that has been with this subject for a good 20 years, at LEAST...

I remember in HS when hearing about this subject for the first time, and it wasn’t hard to believe that a World Government would be an objective, but as a (sort of) liberal at the time it only seemed a natural progression of society, and I didn’t realize the importance of sovereignty and those issues at the time.

Maybe that attitude is also a problem we are dealing with. No-one likes wars, so perhaps the idea of a one world government isn’t as scary to them as it is for us? Perhaps even some conservatives have doubts as to how bad it would really be for our way of life?

Anyway, somehow we have to take hold of this information and present it from a different angle???

I’m on the verge of ‘understanding’ something at the moment in regards to how to repackage this information, but can’t put it into words. It’s like the whole broad subject needs to be rearranged, or something... I’ll post again in response when I unravel the thoughts I’m having trouble expressing at the moment! :)

[LibertyRocks]

Marking your post to read more on it later! Thanks for posting it...

Honestly, I think they know it’s here or on the way and they (at least liberals) think it’s NECESSARY in order to ‘erase’ war from the planet. They don’t see the dangers of this utopia they are striving for... Not sure how to ‘make’ them see it either.

[Quix]

GOOD POINTS.

THX THX.

heading back to bed.

[The Comedian]

Note this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2520488/posts

about 24 well known experts predicting econ collapse between July-Oct 2010

Looks like His Majesty decided this post was beneath him.

If you still have it, please mail it to me either FReep or external.

As you know, I added my voice to that chorus before it started singing.

Also, "nuclear terror" is coming right up any time now.

And finally, brilliant post on the NWO chock full o' data. Well done bro.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[Quix]

I think with your DSL . . .

virtually every authentic FREEPER

WANTED to believe the Klintoons were as black as they were.

Everyone was cheering you on FROM THE BEGINNING.

You were ‘convincing the choir’ from the beginning.

Why isn’t that the case for all authentic FREEPER CONSERVATIVES

with respect to globalism.

What is soooooooooo difficult about

TRULY, REALLY, THOROUGHLY SEEING

THAT at this point in time . . .

COMMUNISM = SOCIALISM = GLOBALISM = all facets of the IDENTICAL stinky black ‘diamond’ in the very rough?

PLEASE TELL ME, the reluctant ones are

—NOT willfully blind;
—NOT utterly clueless;
—NOT devoid of critical thinking skills;
—NOT sticking their heads in the sand

about such facts, forces and issues.

[Quix]

Making it clickable to find it . . .

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2520488/posts

THANKS TONS FOR YOUR KIND WORDS.

I found it originally, I think, via ATS . . . let me see if I can find the link . . .

This seems to be a slightly different thread but same type of collection of data from different sources:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread573315/pg1