Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abuse of Caucus [whiner's caucus]
Self | 22 Feb 2011 | Natural Law

Posted on 02/22/2011 2:53:04 PM PST by Natural Law

An alarming trend is developing in the Free Republic Religion Forum in which a caucus identifier is being claimed for non-existent or impossibly defined groups. With the caucuses being self defined we see nonsense like the Sola Scriptura Caucus. Of course it doesn’t mean all Scripture, only the thread initiators or Forum Moderators definition of Scripture. Jews who believe in the Scripture of the Old Testament are excluded. Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, and Jehovah’s Witnesses are excluded even though they believe in the sufficiency of their own versions of Scripture. The not so transparent purpose of these faux caucuses is clearly to exclude a group of FReepers in a modern day repetition of “Whites Only” and “Irish Need Not Apply” prejudice. If this is allowed to stand what will we see next; caucuses so narrowly defined so as to only include one’s bridge club or to exclude an individual FReeper? How about a caucus designation for everyone but citizens from New York? How about a men’s only caucus? How about a caucus for those of us who drive BMWs? And what is being discussed in these faux caucus threads? Critical doctrinal issues such as ruggedized aircraft, home schooling, and civil unrest in Egypt. Give me a break!


TOPICS: Ecumenism; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: caucus; caucusaddedbyjr; caucusthreads; religionforum; religionforumghetto; whiner; whinercaucus; whinerscaucus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-657 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Anyone reading this exchange back through the comments can easily see what's been said. A member of your own church said those who insist on NOT calling themselves Roman Catholic tend to be the more liberal members of that liberal organization.

And you get this one wrong. He said that those who call themselves members of a particular church tend to be more liberal. Are you unaware of what this means, or should I dumb it down for another exemplary member of the United States educational system?

That's something you've demanded of us, IIRC. To be called "Catholic," and not Roman Catholic.

Where have I demanded anything of you, Dr. E.? I expect nothing from you, demand nothing of you, and have my expectations fulfilled with every post.

621 posted on 02/24/2011 7:04:25 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; Quix
You cannot deny the works of the Holy Spirit without consequences, yet we have our ‘as usual’ denier here on this thread begging the Lord to strike him.

If you're speaking of me, I feel like Elijah facing the false prophets of Baal.

Good luck, kiddies. Your “daddy god” is trifle bit too small if you can keep him boxed up at your beck and call. I think you need to catch Jesse's E-Ticket gondola ride to heaven.

622 posted on 02/24/2011 7:21:10 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxKirkPresbyterian; Quix; Gamecock; topcat54; RJR_fan; RnMomof7; metmom; Alex Murphy; ...
ORTHODOXKIRKPRESBYTERIAN TO QUIX: Has the Holy Spirit ever filled you inside and used you to conduct His work?

Earlier I said that was a "strange question for a Christian to ask." But it's probably even more peculiar that someone who says they're an Orthodox Presbyterian is compelled to ask that question.

What does your church teach you about the indwelling Holy Spirit and the work of God within Christ's sheep?

Please be specific. I'm interested in your opinion. "Has the Holy Spirit ever filled you inside and used you to duct His work?"

623 posted on 02/24/2011 7:23:14 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxKirkPresbyterian

What exactly in that post was “well said?”


624 posted on 02/24/2011 7:24:21 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

>> “I feel like Elijah facing the false prophets of Baal.” <<

Take ‘Elijah facing’ out and the bell rings.
.


625 posted on 02/24/2011 7:28:31 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
The Armenian Church is one of the many Catholic rites -- read on:

  ARMENIAN. Armenia was the first country to adopt Christianity as the state religion in the 4th century. They used the Antiochine liturgy of St. James said in the Armenian language. At that time Armenia was located in eastern Turkey. After it was destroyed in the 11th century it moved to Cilicia (southern Turkey). That is why to this day the Patriarch of this rite is known as the Patriarch of Cilicia of the Armenians. The Armenians also fell into heresy after the Council of Chalcedon. The Council of Florence in 1439 declared reunion with the Armenians, and Pope Benedict XIV confirmed the first Patriarch in 1742. The Turks massacred roughly two million Armenians at the end of World War I. Most members of this rite live in Lebanon.

 

5. ARMENIAN Armenian Classical Armenian Patriarch of Cilicia of the Armenians Armenia

 

From this thread: THE RITES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH -- There are many!


626 posted on 02/24/2011 7:33:02 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Take ‘Elijah facing’ out and the bell rings.

Did you give one of these fakers money too?

627 posted on 02/24/2011 7:33:54 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The Armenian Church is one ...

Armenians protest being called Arminians

628 posted on 02/24/2011 7:37:24 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Quix
He does NOT have to get my OK on it!

LOLOL! Nor mine or anyone else's. Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!
629 posted on 02/24/2011 7:43:14 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!

THX FOR YOUR KIND REPLY.

LUB Penguin Gal


630 posted on 02/24/2011 8:19:28 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; metmom

Some posts are too good for merely bookmarking. I put this one on my profile page.


631 posted on 02/24/2011 8:55:12 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
lolrotf....how ingenious of you...this was great!
632 posted on 02/25/2011 3:31:01 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

It has been said...”we move...He doesn’t”


633 posted on 02/25/2011 3:33:15 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Gamecock

FR friend I am ALWAYS full of the Holy Spirit that I received when I was saved.. 100% full

The issue is not His absence but our sin


634 posted on 02/25/2011 12:46:40 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Thanks for your kind reply.

Maybe semantics are not fully capable.


635 posted on 02/25/2011 2:45:33 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

You’re on the religion forum, and have mad your post about an individual.

Shame on you!


636 posted on 02/25/2011 4:45:47 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: caww
Lucky you Dr....hopefully that list will grow more and more!

Love it!

Hoss

637 posted on 02/25/2011 5:30:21 PM PST by HossB86 ( NOBODY admits to being a Calvinist unless they are one. I AM ONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Evidently at some

visceral . . . deeper levels . . .

my personna is somehow threatening to those who feel such an addicted compulsion to trash me in order to stand on the presumed rubble of my pretended shredded identity . . . therewith to feel better about their own feeble self-worth.

Tis a common phenomenon. Given their desperate assaults . . . evidently their NEED to do such is quite large.


638 posted on 02/25/2011 5:48:26 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
we will never be foresaken.

Perhaps you should take up golf, then.

639 posted on 02/25/2011 5:53:22 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
The Catholic Church is an institution run by men, all kinds of men, and it is not THE Chruch Jesus is returning for some day. You’re big on ‘giving what the church says’ you are supposed to believe regarding scriptures, but there are so many man-made tenents where do you draw the line?

All kinds of men and apartment owner as well?

... With you, you don’t draw a line, you just swallow it all and tell us ‘the church’ is the authority.

I posted here the Scripture that gives the authority of the Church as given by Jesus. Men alone are like the Eunuch - staring blindly at the words; or else like the first millennium heretics - making it all up as they go along.

And if you doubt what I’m telling you, doa word study of the origins of ‘Lucifer’ in Old Testament translations. [HINT: was invented in second century AD when translating Isaiah 14, not found in the original texts; a whole mythos on Lucifer as satan has been invent over the centuries.]

Certainly, the Church massaged the original books into the form that you wave around now. Matthew 28:19 (the Trinitarian formula), and the Comma Johanneum (to emphasize the Trinitarian formula) were not inserted into Scripture until late second or early third century, as well. And numerous other examples. So, does that mean that you will reject that Bible in your hand, which is created by the authorized men of the Church?

640 posted on 02/25/2011 6:03:27 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-657 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson