Posted on 10/17/2012 4:33:29 AM PDT by Colofornian
There's no "might" about it: There's no way Romney will take NJ, CT, or even Minnesota.
This is no different, btw, than those who accuse Virgil Goode/third party voters of "wishful thinking" -- that it would somehow "make a difference."
You are indeed engaging in "wishful thinking" if you think Romney could somehow take one of those three states.
This isn't only opinion-polling, but the actual votes brought to bear on POTUS elections in 2008, 2004, 2000, and the 20th century.
Then what word WOULD you use; if you were speaking to my face?
You could at least TRY!
The lesser of two evils...
Is judgement coming upon this nation no matter what?
Then, by all means, leave the battlefield and declartion VICTORY!!!
And you claim to be concerned this is part of Romney’s agenda?
GOOD!
I at least get tossed into the same grouping that contains Romneybots!
(And we all know that THE leader of the free world has absolutely nothing to do with needing qualities such as discernment, an ability to guard against deception -- vs. say, gullibility or vulnerability to deception...why, that quality only applies to "spiritual leaders"...) /sarc
It was sarcasm.
Kind of a mishmash of bits and pieces of MORMON rituals performed in the Temples.
http://www.lifeaftermormonism.net/forum/topics/can-someone-please-explain
>> Do this 17 more times and you’ll have accomplished... WHAT?
False dichotomy, you tool of Satan. Get behind me!
Well said.
Why Joseph Smith Ran for President
I would not have suffered my name to have been used by my friends on anywise as President of the United States, or candidate for that office,
if I and my friends could have had the privilege of enjoying our religious and civil rights as American citizens, even those rights which the Constitution guarantees unto all her citizens alike.
But this as a people we have been denied from the beginning. Persecution has rolled upon our heads from time to time, from portions of the United States, like peals of thunder, because of our religion; and no portion of the Government as yet has stepped forward for our relief.
And in view of these things, I feel it to be my right and privilege to obtain what influence and power I can, lawfully, in the United States, for the protection of injured innocence.
Joseph Smith, History of the Church, 6:21011.
No...I'd say the "L" word above -- or since I don't know your intent, perhaps you're just mistaken -- applies to you...and you've 100% shot any credibility you might have on this site with such a false "pro-abortion" accusation.
Per: OnTheIssues: Virgil Goode on Abortion:
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted YES on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mothers life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
No federal funding of abortion, but no litmus test. (Dec 2000)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
Rated 100% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance. (Dec 2006)
Prohibit transporting minors across state lines for abortion. (Jan 2008)
Grant the pre-born equal protection under 14th Amendment. (Jan 2007)
**************
In contrast, the very man you support, Mitt Romney, told CBS News in late August 2012 that he favors abortions for the wide-open, anything-goes reason of "health of the mother" ("health" of course being determined by the abortionist, and the abortion industry)...ALONG with OTHER exceptions.
He told Katie Couric dec of 07 that 'twas "OK" for parents of embyros to either give up their embryos for adoption -- or "donate" them to "research."
MA RomneyCare, with a Planned Parenthood rep permanently on the commonwealth oversight board as set up by Romney, has gone from $50 taxpayer funded abortions in that state to some that are 100% covered by such funds!
Wake-up! to your own accusations -- as applied to Romney!!!
“I would love to hear him explain why he believes he is smarter than the writers of Holy Scripture”
Bang-on!
I’m still wondering why I should care who this man endorses... or Ross Perot either.
Honestly I couldn’t care LESS who endorses who.
“Ross Perot endorsed Romney.
Your move.”
You’ve lost me... am I supposed to care about Ross Perot’s opinion?
It ain't about FAITH; but FALSE TEACHINGS.
Did you NOT learn from Catholicism that they MUST be exposed and expunged??
I am saying to you that Virgil Goode knows full well he has NO shot at ever becoming president but he doesn’t care if he reelects Obama to four more years. There has never been a more pro-abortion president than Obama and you’re going to help reelect him. THINK!!
Intolerant?
You make the call.
Possibly racist?
Maybe as well.
Yes.
#1: Peter said that judgment "begins" with "the household of God."
#2: And certainly, socially, we've invited it even apart from our political choices.
As somebody once aptly said, "If God doesn't judge America, He'll have to apologize to Sodom an Gomorrah."
#3: I simply think, that with what we've done in this political season, we've "fast-forwarded" it to a point of key divine provocation.
We've placed $ -- and with it the sanctioning of a rival "god" to THE God -- over denouncing false worship centers.
If you look at Exodus, Deuteronomy, Numbers -- and then the Kings and Chronicles books -- the most common theme that provoked God to the extreme was Israel's catering to false gods, and a series of kings' failures to remove false worship centers from a "front and center" role in their culture.
Here, in this election, we have now elevated and openly endorsed somebody who says "I am indeed a 'god' - in embryo -- and I will one day compete with THE God for worship, glory, reception of prayer, role as 'creator', etc."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.