Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Mass the Real Sacrifice of Christ?
In Plain Site ^ | Febuary 7 ,2015 | James G. McCarthy

Posted on 02/08/2015 12:34:39 PM PST by RnMomof7

Few Catholics think about this question. The reason is that most Catholics are not aware that the Church teaches that the Mass is an actual sacrifice. They know that the rite is called the Sacrifice of the Mass, that it is performed by a priest, that the congregation assembles before an altar, and that the consecrated bread wafers are called hosts. Nevertheless, most Catholics do not seem to realize that the Church teaches that the Mass is a real and true sacrifice, that a prime function of the Catholic priesthood is to offer sacrifice, that an altar is a place of sacrifice, and that the word host is from the Latin word hostia, meaning sacrificial victim.

When I told Anthony, a Catholic catechism teacher, that he was going to a sacrifice for sins each week, he denied it. Anthony’s sister, Teresa, had been born again several years earlier and had left the Catholic Church. She had been sharing the gospel with Anthony, and he too now was claiming to be trusting Christ alone for his salvation. He remained, however, loyal to the Catholic Church and its practices.

The next time I saw Anthony he admitted that he had been wrong. Despite almost forty years in the Catholic Church and experience as a catechism teacher, he didn’t know that the Mass was supposedly the actual sacrifice of Christ. Neither did he realize that he was not only attending Christ’s sacrifice, but he was participating in it.

One must ask: What kind of worship is this? The cross was a horrific event. It was the enemies of the Lord Jesus, not His disciples, who crucified Him. Why would anyone calling himself a Christian want to participate in the continuation of the cross?

Furthermore, as the Lord died on the cross, He cried out, "It is finished!" (John 19:30). Why then does the Church want to continue His sacrifice? He died "once for all" (Hebrews 7:27, 9:12, 9:26, 9:28, 10:10). How then can the Church say that each offering of the Sacrifice of the Mass appeases the wrath of God? The Lord "entered the holy place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption" (Hebrews 9:12). Why then does the Church seek to continually re-present Christ in His victimhood to the Father? The Lord is not in a state of victimhood. He is the risen, glorified, crowned King of Glory.

Rome’s theologians, you can be sure, have responses to each of these questions. But don’t expect any simple or straightforward answers. While writing The Gospel According to Rome, I asked Michael, a scholarly colleague with advanced theological degrees, to critique the section of the manuscript that reviewed the Church’s rebuttal to criticism of the Mass. About to complete a doctorate in biblical Hebrew at a leading university, I was confident that, if anyone could make sense of them, it was Michael. I was expecting him to carefully analyze each response, delving into the finer points of theology. To my amazement, he simply wrote in the margin, "WHAT A BUNCH OF HOOEY!"

Michael was right. Rome’s explanation of the glaring contradictions of the Mass amount to nothing more than mystical mumbo-jumbo and high sounding nonsense.

Even more distressing is the way the Church distorts the Scriptures in an attempt to provide a biblical basis for the Mass. Take, for example, the following reference to the Mass in Pope John Paul II’s recent best-seller, Crossing the Threshold of Hope:

Here the Pope actually changes the Scriptures. Though he modifies the wording of Hebrews 9:12, he puts his new version in quotation marks and retains the reference, suggesting that it compares well to the original. Three alterations, however, have so distorted the meaning of the verse that the Pope’s new version teaches the very opposite of what the original did. Before examining how the verse has been changed and why the Pope would want to modify it, consider first the original meaning of the verse and its context.

At Mount Sinai God showed Moses a tabernacle in heaven, and instructed him to build a similar tabernacle on earth, carefully following its pattern (Exodus 25:9, 40; Acts 7:44; Hebrews 8:5). It was to be a rectangular tent with a single entryway and no windows. Inside a curtain was to divide the structure into a large outer room and a smaller inner room.

The earthly tabernacle was to serve as the focal point of Israel’s worship (Exodus 25:8; 29:42). Each day Jewish priests were to enter its outer room and perform various duties (Exodus 30:7-8; Leviticus 4:18, 24:1-9). Once a year on the Day of Atonement the Jewish high priest was to enter the inner room, presenting the blood of sin offerings to make atonement for himself and for the nation (Leviticus 16:1-34). In front of the tabernacle, God told Moses to construct a bronze altar upon which the priests were to continually offer animal sacrifices (Numbers 28-29).

Hebrews 9 reviews many of these details. There the emphasis is placed on the frequency with which the Jewish priests were to enter the tabernacle to perform their duties:

The verses that follow contrast the continual and yearly ministry of the Jewish priests in the earthly tabernacle with the once for all ministry of the Lord Jesus in the heavenly tabernacle.

These verses speak of an event following the crucifixion when the Lord Jesus entered into the presence of God in the heavenly tabernacle. There He presented His shed blood on our behalf (Hebrews 9:24-25). Unlike the Jewish priests, however, who "are continually entering" (Hebrews 9:6) and the high priest who "enters once a year" (Hebrews 9:7), the Lord Jesus, our High Priest, entered the holy place of the heavenly tabernacle "once for all, having obtained eternal redemption" (Hebrews 9:12). Only one presentation of His blood was necessary for God accepted it as the perfect and complete satisfaction for our sins.

Now consider how Pope John Paul II has altered the meaning of Hebrews 9:12. He writes that "...Jesus Christ constantly ‘enters into God’s sanctuary thus obtaining eternal redemption’ (cf. Hebrews 9:12)."iv Three changes are apparent.

The original text of Hebrews 9:12 says that Christ "entered" God’s sanctuary. The Greek verb is in the indicative mood and the aorist tense. This portrays Christ’s entrance into the heavenly sanctuary as an event in past time, freezing the action as if taking a snapshot of it. The Pope changes the verb to the present tense, writing that Christ "enters into God’s sanctuary." This makes Christ’s entrance an event that is now occurring, viewing the action as something that is in progress.

Further distorting the meaning of the verse, the Pope introduces it with the word constantly, writing that "…Jesus Christ constantly ‘enters into God’s sanctuary’ (cf. Hebrews 9:12)."v The verse, however, says that Christ "entered the holy place once for all" (Hebrews 9:11). In Hebrews 9 it is the Jewish priests who are constantly entering into the tabernacle. This is contrasted with the Lord Jesus who entered only once.

Finally, John Paul changes the ending of the verse to teach that by constantly entering the heavenly sanctuary Jesus Christ is "‘thus obtaining eternal redemption’ (cf. Hebrews 9:12)."vi The Bible says that Christ entered the holy place once for all, "having obtained eternal redemption." The work of redemption is finished, not ongoing.

Now why would the Pope want to change the Scriptures? Why would he want his readers to think that the Bible teaches that Christ "constantly ‘enters into God’s sanctuary thus obtaining eternal redemption’" instead of what it actually teaches, that Christ "entered the holy place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption"? Why? Because Rome holds that Christ must be constantly re-presented in His victimhood to God through the Mass for our salvation. With each offering of the Mass, some 120 million times a year, the Church says that "the work of our redemption is continually carried out."vii The Pope, not finding Hebrews 9:12 to his liking, simply changed it. This was not a slip of the pen, but a calculated alteration of God’s Word to make the Sacrifice of the Mass appear biblical.

Adapted from Conversations with Catholics by James G. McCarthy (Harvest House Publishers: Eugene, 1997)

Notes:

i. Liturgy of the Eucharist, First Eucharistic Prayer, The Memorial Prayer.

ii. Second Vatican Council, "Sacred Liturgy," Second Instruction on the Proper Implementation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, no. 12.

iii. Pope John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope (New York: Knopf, 1995), p. 139.

iv. Ibid.

v. Ibid.

vi. Ibid.

vii. Second Vatican Council, "Life of Priests," no. 13. See also the Code of Canon Law, canon 904.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicbashing; christ; communion; lordssupper; mass; onceforall; remembrance; sacrifice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-294 next last
To: 2nd amendment mama
Exodus 20:4 - Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. or

You ask if I have a read Isaiah 42:8 - I am the Lord: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

You ask if I have a reading Comprehension problem but don't understand the difference between a memorial and an idol. Here is a hint Catholics don't worship idols, or even have idols.

BTW why did God order the creation of the bronze serpent and the seraphim on the Ark of the covenant?

221 posted on 02/09/2015 11:52:19 AM PST by verga (I might as well be playing Chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Okay please clarify, do prots preach Christ crucified or not?


222 posted on 02/09/2015 12:02:11 PM PST by verga (I might as well be playing Chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: verga
Yes, we do believe that Christ was crucified for our sins but we don't leave him hanging on the cross (as I stated in my post #211). He rose from the dead. He's NOT still hanging on that cross! That was the purpose of the cross. To die for our sins, rise from the dead and ascend into Heaven for our eternal Salvation.

Does your religion also teach that Christ is Risen? (I already know the answer to this) but I want to see your interpretation.

223 posted on 02/09/2015 12:11:09 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Why should anyone listen you you? Are you pretending to have authority? Have you received the Holy Spirit from hands laid upon you? Whose hands?

If your authority doesn’t come from the apostles, it’s nothing. If you don’t keep the unwritten traditions, your faith is not biblical.

Your god is a book.


224 posted on 02/09/2015 12:11:36 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
>>If your authority doesn’t come from the apostles, it’s nothing.<<

Who told you that lie?

Romans 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

Are you saying you are none of His?

Ephesians 1:13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit,

Have you not believed? It says "when you believed". It says "when you believed" not when they laid hands on you.

>>If you don’t keep the unwritten traditions, your faith is not biblical.<<

What unwritten traditions were the apostles talking about? Please show documented proof.

225 posted on 02/09/2015 12:29:10 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Romans 10:14ff: But how are men to call upon him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without a preacher? And how can men preach unless they are sent?

Who sent you?

Acts 6:6 These they set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands upon them.

Who has laid his hands on you?

Acts 8:17 Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit. Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was given through the laying on of the apostles’ hands, he offered them money, saying, “Give me also this power, that any one on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit.”

Acts 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came on them; and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

1 Timothy 5:22 Do not be hasty in the laying on of hands.

Ephesians 1:13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation.

It says “heard”, not read. Of course what they heard was “repent and be baptized, every one of you.”


226 posted on 02/09/2015 12:41:26 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
>>And how are they to hear without a preacher?<<

Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

Are you saying that scripture is not the word of God?

>>Who sent you?<<

Who sent you? Here you are preaching to me so I take it someone sent you? You're not being hypocritical are you?

>>Who has laid his hands on you?<<

Did you not read my last post including the passage that says those who believe receive the Holy Spirit when they believe? Why ask questions that have already been answered?

>>It says “heard”, not read.<<

See above. Again I ask you, do you not believe that scripture is the word of God?

227 posted on 02/09/2015 12:57:29 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Yes, we do believe that Christ was crucified for our sins but we don't leave him hanging on the cross (as I stated in my post #211).

Still not answering the question. Do you preach Christ crucified? I am not asking if you beleive He was crucified, I am asking if you preach Him crucufued.

Does your religion also teach that Christ is Risen? (I already know the answer to this) but I want to see your interpretation.Seriously have you ever read either the Nicene Constantinople creed or the apostles's Creed?

Apostle's Creed

1. I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth:

2. And in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, our Lord:

3. Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary:

4. Suffered under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead and buried: He descended into hell:

5. The third day he rose again from the dead:

6. He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty:

7. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead:

8. I believe in the Holy Ghost:

9. I believe in the holy catholic church: the communion of saints:

10. The forgiveness of sins:

1l. The resurrection of the body: 12. And the life everlasting. Amen.

Nicene Creed

I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.

Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.

And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father [and the Son]; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.

And I believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

There is no interpretation required.

228 posted on 02/09/2015 1:05:47 PM PST by verga (I might as well be playing Chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: verga

Define “preach Christ crucified”?


229 posted on 02/09/2015 1:21:57 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; verga

Better yet, he could define *crucufued*


230 posted on 02/09/2015 1:25:03 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

How do you know scripture is the word of od?


231 posted on 02/09/2015 1:25:57 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: verga
There is no interpretation required.

Everything that is ever read or heard or seen is interpreted by the individual.

There is not a thing that is exempt from it and Catholics are just as *guilty* of their own personal interpretation of anything as anyone else on the planet.

232 posted on 02/09/2015 1:26:41 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
He also said to “search the scriptures daily to see if what they teach is true”.

That is a false statement and a common misunderstanding of the holy scriptures.

233 posted on 02/09/2015 1:26:54 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; verga
If I may add, for your benefit and anyone else's reading this: the reason Catholics have so many Crucifixes, in our homes and churches, is to remind us of the suffering He endured for us. We know He is risen now (Alelujah).

However, it's helpful, if just for a dose of good humility, to meditate on His suffering and that it (the suffering) was done for each of us personally. Not just "for the whole world" but for *you*, 2nd Amendment Mama (and for me, and for verga) for each of us personally did He suffer such great pain. He literally knew about each of us, knew the numbers of the hairs on our heads, much less every other detail about each one of us, more detail than else even know about ourselves, as He suffered on that Cross. He had each of us in mind on that Cross, thinking of every one, by name.

That is the point of the Crucifix. To remind us daily of this great love He had and has for us. Each and every individual person. Because as sinful creatures, it's all too easy for us to forget this level of intimacy He exhibits in and through such suffering.

234 posted on 02/09/2015 1:26:55 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism; RnMomof7; Elsie
What secret knowledge does “Rome” have?

You tell us.

Catholics are the ones always saying that Scripture alone isn't enough and yet when asked time and again what it is that is lacking in Scripture that we need to know for salvation that the Catholic church is privy to, all we ever hear is crickets.

235 posted on 02/09/2015 1:28:57 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

You don’t answer any of my questions so I will simply be done with you.


236 posted on 02/09/2015 1:38:30 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
>>That is a false statement and a common misunderstanding of the holy scriptures.<<

LOL I saw your lame attempt at twisting the words of that passage. I doubt anyone with reading comprehension bought your tripe.

237 posted on 02/09/2015 1:39:51 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
Well if you don't know what "Crucified" means you obviously can't preach it.

Thank you

238 posted on 02/09/2015 1:47:27 PM PST by verga (I might as well be playing Chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
239 posted on 02/09/2015 1:51:36 PM PST by verga (I might as well be playing Chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: verga

I didn’t think you could.......


240 posted on 02/09/2015 2:05:55 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson