Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary, Mother of God, The Greatest of all Her Titles
http://www.catholicchristiananswers.com ^ | August 12, 2015 | Jessie Neace

Posted on 08/17/2015 6:07:35 PM PDT by NKP_Vet

It is that time of week again, where we talk about the Mary, the Mother of God. This is definitely the single most important title that Mary has. If someone gets this wrong, then they get the Divinity of our Lord wrong, and that means the whole plan of Salvation is just messed up. So let us look at this most important title.

Theotokos, God-bearer in Greek, is what the council of Ephesus declared in 431. It specifically says this “If anyone does not confess that God is truly Emmanuel, and that on this account the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God (for according to the flesh she gave birth to the Word of God become flesh by birth), let him be anathema.” Now just that statement alone proves the early Church believed that there was Authority given to the bishops to decide sound doctrine, Mary was a Holy Virgin her entire life, and that She bore God. However, we only have time for one today.

Now many times we will hear non-Catholics tell us that this title is nowhere found in Scripture, explicitly at least. However, they cannot themselves find a Scripture verse that says that all doctrine and dogma must be explicitly proven in Scripture. I bet they can never find that. This is a trap they set up for themselves and it is a very unfair double standard that they expect us to meet, but they do not have to. However, on top of this double standard is if we used that same standard, then the doctrine of the Trinity is thrown out, since it’s not an explicit teaching, but instead is implicit in Scripture. This double standard seems to cause more problems that it’s worth wouldn’t you say?

Here is the cold hard truth of it though, all Christians rely on some Church Tradition, as well as Scripture, to validate their doctrines, whether they admit it or not. With that being said, Scripture and Tradition can never contradict one another. The Traditions of men can contradict the Word of God, but the Traditions God left us, through Christ, in the Holy Spirit, are binding upon us, as we are to hold fast to Traditions. So then, what is the real question? The real question is, Does Scripture contradict the teaching that Mary is the Mother of God, and is that doctrine found in Scripture at least implicitly?

Let us begin with Luke 1:43, where Mary visited Elizabeth. There Elizabeth exclaimed “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! And why is this granted me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” Because Mary was the Mother of the Lord, who is the Second part of the Holy Trinity, Mary is truly and rightfully called the Mother of God.

We also see in Isaiah 7:14 “Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which is interpreted God with us.” Jesus is God. He was God when He was in the womb, conceived, lived, died, buried, resurrected, in the Eucharist, and in Heaven. The Messiah, who is God, was to be born of a virgin, according to Scripture. God was born of a virgin, and it’s right there in Isaiah, who prophesied of Christ birth. That means both Old and New Testament support the Catholic Doctrine of the Mother of God.

However, this may not be enough for some non-Catholics. Some say that Elisabeth called Christ Lord, and not God, saying that Mary was only to give birth to the human child, the Lord Jesus Christ. So then the question becomes, does lord here mean divinity or just authority? Let’s look at the context.

First let us look at 1 Cor. 8:5, which states “Indeed there are many gods and many lords, yet to us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.” St. Paul makes it clear that Jesus is the one True, Lord, as opposed to all the false ones, that the pagans who converted in Corinth were probably worshiping. So then, they would understand that Jesus is God. This holds true to the Jews who converted too, who would know Deut. 6:4 “Hear, therefore, o Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord.”

So then that brings us back to Luke 1:43. Elizabeth calls Mary the mother of her Lord. The Mother…Mothers give birth to persons, not natures, let us remember that. Mary did not just give birth to the human nature of Christ, she gave birth to the person of Christ. Christ personhood is Divine, it is God the Son.

Then let us look at 2 Sam. 6:9 where the King, who was David says “How can the ark of the Lord come to me (being the ark of the covenant)” Then in 2 Samuel 616 we see King David leaping in the presence of the Ark, just as John the Baptist did. Then we yet again see another parallel, which says that the ark of the Lord abode in the house of Obededom the Gethite for three months (2 Sam. 6:11), and according to Luke 1:56 Mary remained in the house of Elizabeth about three months. Then, we see that the ark of the covenant carried three items, manna, the Ten Commandments, and Aaron’s rod. These are all types of things Christ are, the Bread of Life, Word made Flesh, and our true High Priest.

Even knowing all this though, there are still those who would deny that Mary is the Mother of God. So then we have to ask, who is Jesus Christ to them? If Mary is not the Mother of God, then who did she give birth to? Many would say it was an earthly human lord, not God. So then, what does that make Christ? If Mary did not give birth to God, then who did she give birth to? Was not Christ God when He was conceived?

If someone says Mary only gave birth to the person of Christ one of two errors, or both could happen, and that is the Denial of the divinity of Christ, and that one would have to say Christ is two distinct persons, and that he is not One. Both were considered heresy in the Early Church. Christ is one Person, with two natures, Divine and Human, which go together and are not separate of one another. If one denies that, the ultimately they are speaking about a different Christ, and St. Paul warns us about that problem, and to not to give heed to them (2 Cor. 11:4).

So then, some say that Mary is the mother of the Trinity if we take it that far, however, this is not true. Mary gave birth to the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2nd Person, who is still God just not the Trinity. However, we must never forget that each Person in the Trinity shares the same Divine Nature and is fully God.

One thing some still point out is that Christ is eternal, so for Mary to be the Mother of God she would have to be God. However the Church does not say Mary is the source of the Divine Nature of the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity. To better understand this let’s look at humanity. Parents give birth to a person, however they are not the author of life, and certainly did not give the child it’s soul. Thus is true with Mary, she did not give Christ His Divine Nature, though she was the Mother of more than just the human form of Christ, because she gave birth to a person, who was God.


TOPICS: Apologetics; History; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: apologetics; provocativeclaims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,341-1,354 next last
To: xone

Please quote Galatians 1:8 for me. Quote it in full.


341 posted on 08/19/2015 8:15:02 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Reason #223 Not to Call Mary the "mother of God":

"The title “Mother of God” has NEVER meant that Mary is the mother of the eternal, Triune God."

342 posted on 08/19/2015 8:19:40 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: xone

Where do you find “God’s view of Scripture”? In Scripture or someplace else?

Of course it’s circular reasoning.

You’re so lucky the muslims didn’t get to you first. Your conviction that a text can validate itself without reference to anything external is totally their cup of tea.


343 posted on 08/19/2015 8:21:28 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Something else that a child can understand but something Catholic-haters have a hard time understanding.

One of the 10 Commandments is honoring your mother and father.

Jesus’ mother was Mary.

He honored her.

We all have an earthly, physical mother. We are told to honor her. Christians also have a spiritual mother and her name is Mary.

We are told to emulate Christ in our lives. If Christ honored his mother and we are told to live like Christ, how can you not honor his/your mother?

God exhorts us to honor father and mother. He values honoring parents enough to include it in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:12) and again in the New Testament: “Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor your father and mother which is the first commandment with a promise, so that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth” (Ephesians 6:1-3). Honoring parents is the only command in Scripture that promises long life as a reward. Those who honor their parents are blessed (Jeremiah 35:18-19). In contrast, those with a “depraved mind” and those who exhibit ungodliness in the last days are characterized by disobedience to parents (Romans 1:30; 2 Timothy 3:2).


344 posted on 08/19/2015 8:42:07 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
They don’t need no stinking Scriptures, as long as their leaders tell them that black is white!

Do you affirm or deny that Mary is the mother of "God with us" according to the scriptures ?

And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily. But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
Isaiah, Catholic chapter seven, Protestant verses thirteen to fourteen, Matthew, Catholic chapter seven, Protestant verses eighteen to twenty three, as authorized, but not authored, by King James
Bold emphasis mine

345 posted on 08/19/2015 8:49:09 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Ah, but I’m sure your magicsteeringthem can teach me to believe and call upon their mediatrix/co-redemtrix, right?


346 posted on 08/19/2015 9:03:23 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Have you not read, ‘Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God?’ Is the Bible The Word of God? Before the New Testament was written down, exclaiming Jesus as Messiah and Savior and Lord, all the faithers had was the Old Testament, the Septuagint probably for most, except maybe guys like Saul who studied under Gamaliel. When the New Testament witness Gospels and letters were then available, the saved ‘cometh by hearing, and hearing by The Word of God.’


347 posted on 08/19/2015 9:07:27 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

If you are a catholic, it is indeed ironic that you would try to use idol worship as a weapon against a Christian, seeing as how your religion has pagan principles of eating the godman and praying to idol statuary for intercession.


348 posted on 08/19/2015 9:09:05 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
all the faithers had was the Old Testament, the Septuagint probably for most, except maybe guys like Saul who studied under Gamaliel.

Why do you contradict Scripture?

349 posted on 08/19/2015 9:10:11 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Reason #223 Not to Call Mary the "mother of God": "The title “Mother of God” has NEVER meant that Mary is the mother of the eternal, Triune God."

Do you affirm or deny that Miriam/Mary is the mother of Immanuel/God with us ?

350 posted on 08/19/2015 9:13:46 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Ah, so now I'm supposed to ask 'how did I contradict scriptures', right? Then you who have been telling us that no one is saved by reading the scriptures will pull (probably out of context) a verse which you believe defends this circle you suppose you can trap someone on. Sadly, I have lost respect for you, finding that you are of the same cut as other gamers in the catholic/protestant slugfests.

Have nice day.

351 posted on 08/19/2015 9:14:30 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Please don't place words in my mouth. Why do you ignore the Christians we find in the NT, of whom not one learned of Jesus by reading about him. Why do you pretend these Christians didn't exist? Why do you contradict Scripture?
352 posted on 08/19/2015 9:30:40 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

“We all have an earthly, physical mother. We are told to honor her. Christians also have a spiritual mother and her name is Mary.”

No where in Scripture are we told we have a “spiritual mother”.

Not there. It is an addition to God’s truth.


353 posted on 08/19/2015 9:49:21 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

“Do you affirm or deny that Miriam/Mary is the mother of Immanuel/God with us ? “

Yes, I certainly do affirm or deny!

I think your posts on this have already plumbed the depths of what you got. You’re headed down a road we already covered and rejected as poor use of logic and a category mistake.

And yet you persist in trying to call poor dear Mary something God Himself never did. Why do you do so? Do you know better than He???

Best.


354 posted on 08/19/2015 9:51:09 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Answer the question I asked. If we are to emulate Christ and Christ loved and honored his mother, who was Mary, what part of that can’t you grasp? Was he lying? You don’t believe him?


355 posted on 08/19/2015 9:52:19 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
The word “God” has exactly the same meaning in the second and third propositions: the Second Person of the Trinity.

The second premise is ambiguous in the sense that the word, “God” implies the totality of Jehovah, who is one in essence, and three in Person, not just, "the Second Person of the Trinity", and it also implies His eternal power and divine nature.

That ambiguity is also implicit in the third premise so that the conclusion “mother of God” gives the misleading impression that Mary preceded the Eternal God, which is impossible.

Jesus is God, who became man. Mary is the mother of Jesus according to the flesh (Romans 9:5) However, according to His divine nature He did not have a physical mother.

If Mary is the "Mother of God", how then is Jesus a descendant of David as it says in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 and Romans 9:5?

The conclusion of the syllogism is superficial in that it states only a partial truth and consequently it is misleading. If the syllogism added the word, "incarnate" after the word, "God" in both instances I wouldn't have a problem with it because it would eliminate some of the ambiguity.

Scripture itself is much clearer on the subject than the syllogism.

Cordially,

356 posted on 08/19/2015 9:56:56 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“The Clintons are paging vladimir998.....please pick up on the conspiracy line.”

You’re not disputing anything I said. It’s obvious as to why.


357 posted on 08/19/2015 10:18:04 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

I made no claims. Everything I said was absolutely true. Whether or not you believe it is irrelevant. I made no mistakes - not even one. Nothing you say will change that fact.


358 posted on 08/19/2015 10:19:44 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
Jesus is a divine person with two natures. The two natures are inextricably combined in a single person -- have been from the moment of his conception, when God joined himself perpetually to his own creation. No one is suggesting that Jesus received his divine nature from the Blessed Virgin: she could never give him that because she never possessed that. No Catholic has ever affirmed that Mary is a divinity; that would be absurd. What we affirm is that in Jesus the two natures are so perfectly combined in one person, without possibility of distinction or separation, that we must call Mary the Mother of God.

The precision of subtlety of what we believe is presented in a prayer recited most Sundays of the year:

"It is truly meet and just, right for our salvation, that we should at all times and in all places, give thanks unto Thee, O holy Lord, Father almighty, everlasting God; Who, together with Thine only-begotten Son, and the Holy Ghost, art one God, one Lord: not in the oneness of a single Person, but in the Trinity of one substance. For what we believe by Thy revelation of Thy glory, the same do we believe of Thy Son, the same of the Holy Ghost, without difference or separation. So that in confessing the true and everlasting Godhead, distinction in persons, unity in essence, and equality in majesty may be adored."

That is what Catholics believe. Now you know.

359 posted on 08/19/2015 10:24:07 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Diamond

Another way to present it. HTH:

Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled; without doubt he shall perish everlastingly. And the Catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the Persons; nor dividing the Essence. For there is one Person of the Father; another of the Son; and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, is all one; the Glory equal, the Majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is; such is the Son; and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father uncreated; the Son uncreated; and the Holy Ghost uncreated. The Father unlimited; the Son unlimited; and the Holy Ghost unlimited. The Father eternal; the Son eternal; and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet they are not three eternals; but one eternal. As also there are not three uncreated; nor three infinites, but one uncreated; and one infinite. So likewise the Father is Almighty; the Son Almighty; and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not three Almighties; but one Almighty. So the Father is God; the Son is God; and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods; but one God. So likewise the Father is Lord; the Son Lord; and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not three Lords; but one Lord. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity; to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord; So are we forbidden by the catholic religion; to say, There are three Gods, or three Lords. The Father is made of none; neither created, nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created; but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten; but proceeding. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. And in this Trinity none is before, or after another; none is greater, or less than another. But the whole three Persons are coeternal, and coequal. So that in all things, as aforesaid; the Unity in Trinity, and the Trinity in Unity, is to be worshipped. He therefore that will be saved, let him thus think of the Trinity.

Furthermore it is necessary to everlasting salvation; that he also believe faithfully the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. For the right Faith is, that we believe and confess; that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and Man; God, of the Essence of the Father; begotten before the worlds; and Man, of the Essence of his Mother, born in the world. Perfect God; and perfect Man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting. Equal to the Father, as touching his Godhead; and inferior to the Father as touching his Manhood. Who although he is God and Man; yet he is not two, but one Christ. One; not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh; but by assumption of the Manhood by God. One altogether; not by confusion of Essence; but by unity of Person. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man; so God and Man is one Christ; Who suffered for our salvation; descended into hell; rose again the third day from the dead. He ascended into heaven, he sitteth on the right hand of the God the Father Almighty, from whence he will come to judge the living[17] and the dead. At whose coming all men will rise again with their bodies; And shall give account for their own works. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting; and they that have done evil, into everlasting fire. This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe truly and firmly, he cannot be saved.


360 posted on 08/19/2015 10:30:36 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,341-1,354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson