Posted on 10/13/2016 3:20:45 PM PDT by ebb tide
POPE FRANCIS "I also want to ask you a question." "Who is better: Lutherans or Catholics?" "It is better when they are together.”
(Excerpt) Read more at romereports.com ...
Hear! Hear!
Summer of Love was 1967
Death of the hippie funeral procession was that fall October 6 in the Haight
The real funeral death of the hippie though was actually though postponed for two years and took place at Roman Polanskis home at 10050 Cielo drive in Benedict canyon Los Angelses on 8-9-1969
Any notions of hippie bliss was buried that sad night forever
Got along without them before we met them. Gonna get along without them now so long as Frankie does not further confuse the reality with another "Who am I to judge?"
That question never occurred to Pope Saint John Paul II because he knew exactly who he was to judge and he did as holder of the keys of Peter.
Benedict XVI who had, in his days at the Holy Office acquired the nickname "The Rottweiler," by the time he became pope had become a nice old man "a puppy dog" with intellectual credentials who just wanted everyone to get along. He lifted the excommunications as an act of mercy and the schizzies proceeded to piss all over him and his generous efforts to reconcile them because he would not submit on bended knee to their non-existent "authority."
All this coming from a self-described sedevacantist.
Rant on!
If you believe that you are living in an interregnum because you have proclaimed Francis an apostate, then you are a sedevacantist. Deal with it.
2. Fortunately, I don't have to argue with him since what you have posted from Summa Theologica seems much more relevant to the ongoing medieval controversies within Christendom over the misbehavior of monarchs (i.e., lay investiture of bishops) than it does with raging rebellious BISHOPS who take it upon themselves to exercise the power to appoint bishops which is reserved to the Holy See. God help us! In the time of Aquinas, diocese were probably still choosing their own bishops by popular acclamation. Archbishop Cordileone would not likely be elected Archbishop of San Fransicko where he is the last link with civilization.
Nice try.
Any similar attempts will bring the reminder that Aquinas also believed that the unborn infant did not become a human being until "quickening." I have little doubt that Aquinas, if he were among us today, and shown Pope Saint John Paul II's encyclical The Gospel of Life, would say "How about that I must have been wrong! I submit to his authority." I also suspect Aquinas, if appointed an Inquisitor to sit in judgment on Marcel the Defiant, would have had no problem turning him over to be burned at the stake if he refused to repent. Those were the good old days!
2. Fortunately, I don't have to argue with him since what you have posted from Summa Theologica seems much more relevant to the ongoing medieval controversies within Christendom over the misbehavior of monarchs (i.e., lay investiture of bishops) than it does with raging rebellious BISHOPS who take it upon themselves to exercise the power to appoint bishops which is reserved to the Holy See. God help us! In the time of Aquinas, diocese were probably still choosing their own bishops by popular acclamation. Archbishop Cordileone would not likely be elected Archbishop of San Fransicko where he is the last link with civilization.
Nice try.
Any similar attempts will bring the reminder that Aquinas also believed that the unborn infant did not become a human being until "quickening." I have little doubt that Aquinas, if he were among us today, and shown Pope Saint John Paul II's encyclical The Gospel of Life, would say "How about that I must have been wrong! I submit to his authority." I also suspect Aquinas, if appointed an Inquisitor to sit in judgment on Marcel the Defiant, would have had no problem turning him over to be burned at the stake if he refused to repent. Those were the good old days!
At first I thought you were a cafeteria catholic, by choosing which popes were right and which popes were wrong.
But I’ve now seen that you have admitted you are a sedevacancist.
Your denial of the dogma of EENS also makes one a material heretic.
You do realize Francis canonized your SAINT John Paul II, don't you? If Francis is an apostate and we are living in an interregnum as you believe, his canonizations are null and void and JPII is no saint.
“Remember how worked up y’all got over a photo purporting to be JP II “kissing” the Koran?”
Not sure why that would be “purporting” given JPII prayed that St John the Baptist would protect Islam:
When there is no legitimate pope, there is an interregnum.
You STILL answer no questions. There just MUST be a reason why you are too embarrassed to defend your remarkable fantasies.
Also, when Pius XII had died and before Roncalli was elected, when Roncalli had died and Montini had not been elected, when Montini died and Pope John Paul I had not been elected, and all similar circumstances in history, there were interregnums. In the modern context, sedevacantism seems attached to the claims that the late and usually admirable Giussepe Cardinal Siri was once or twice (1958 and/or 1963) elected as Gregory XVII but somehow "prevented" from serving. Nonetheless, he participated as a cardinal at the conclaves of 1978 that elected Pope John Paul I and Pope Saint John Paul II suggesting that Siri did not agree with the "Siri thesis."
That sort of sedevacantism leads to the idjit notion that we can never again elect a pope since all cardinals appointed by Pius XII and his predecessors are now either dead or so old that they don't know they are alive. That cannot the meaning of Jesus Christ's promise to be with His Church to the end of the world. Nor does it mean that the archschismatic Fellay is the REAL pope or Clarence Kelly or Joseph Santay or one of the Thuc line of illicit bishops whoever leads whatever cult you belong to (assuming that you are using Pius V because of Quo Primum or because of the Society of St. Pius V or some similar group of renegades).
You need some real hobbies. Hurling anathemas and consigning others to hell for offending your tastes is not improving your credibility. Macrame, knitting, stamp collecting, cross-country skiing, whatever.
Will you be helping Frankie's Islamopals and child crucifiers to sail to Europe for the next step in smothering Western Civilization?
If Frankie is said to be pope and, asked if unrepentant practicing sexual perverts should be allowed to receive the Holy Eucharist, he responds with the notorious "Who am I to judge?," what are we to conclude? Recognition of reality is a far cry from grumbling in the darkness that "Gregory XVII" wuz robbed and that we can no longer elect popes. I would say that even you can see the difference but it is not a sure thing.
I have admitted no such thing.
So, I gather you regard John XXIII and Paul VI as right in whatever they did, including instigating Vatican II and approving its decrees. That must end the controversies. When will you parish institute its Novus Ordo Mass schedule? After all, you don't want to be choosing the right and wrong among popes.
It is a good thing that John Wayne Gacy is no longer among the living or Frankie would probably appoint him to the College of Cardinals. After all Gacy was a Chicagoan and every bit as worth appointing as Cupich.
Once again, you think wrongly. I don't, and have never agreed, that those two popes as having been "right" in the above actions.
You keep referring to a "saint" that, has been canonized by, as you yourself has stated, is an apostate.
Cafeteria catholic and a sedevacantist at that.
You are a sede. Deal with it.
There is only one Islam. It is a false, diabolical religion. The same one your precious JPII prayed that a true Catholic Saint would protect.
Deal with it.
I agree. That means that there is no legitimate canonizations. Hence, your precious JPII is no Catholic Saint.
Deal with it.
Sez you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.