Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is the Meaning of Christ’s Circumcision?
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 01-02-17 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 01/02/2018 5:09:40 PM PST by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Salvation

Jesus was the only one to fulfil the law perfectly. He didn’t need to be saved. He is The Saviour.


41 posted on 01/02/2018 8:12:24 PM PST by Bellflower (Who dares believe Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

A perfect response - succinct and to the point.


42 posted on 01/02/2018 8:25:01 PM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Nothing.

There’s nothing to read into it.

Mary and Joseph did what was required by the Law as any good observant Jews would have.


43 posted on 01/02/2018 8:27:35 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwinland; 60Gunner
These are the kinds of things that are discussed in sermons at both Catholic and Protestant churches.

Not in any church I've ever been in.

I can't ever recall hearing a sermon about circumcision.

44 posted on 01/02/2018 8:30:31 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower
He fulfilled the law so that He could redeem those under the Law.

Matthew 5:17-20 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.

Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

45 posted on 01/02/2018 8:33:48 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rexthecat

QuoteC-ircumcision? That’s just a catholic holiday, right? It’s not in the bible as far as I can see.

Unless you follow a calendar different than the pope Gregory calendar, ‘circumcision’ day is a holy day on the world’s calendar. January 1st.

Most don’t work that day so it is deemed a ‘holy day’ in much of the world.

Btw, Good Friday, Holy Saturday and Easter Sunday aren’t in the bible either.
Those three lies are also birthed from the Pope’s calendar.

All would be blessed to start testing what Rome sells as holy or truth.

They may not like the answer though. But that is an opportunity for sanctifican in His Word.


46 posted on 01/02/2018 8:34:52 PM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
Thomas Acquinas wasn’t a Pope. He was probably the most brilliant theologian in history.

That's what your religion tells you, anyway...

47 posted on 01/02/2018 9:24:08 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
Our Lord came. A lot of what he said was open to interpretation, and a lot of interpretations grew up around His words and life.

No it wasn't...It's a matter of belief and then understanding...Not interpretation...

The important thing is that people find their way to the God that is within them; and that’s going to be a somewhat different path for each person.

Where did you get the notion that God is within everyone???

(I don’t understand this perpetual *fighting* over something that is supposed to be about LOVE. It seems to me that if people were actually following the instruction of Jesus, we wouldn’t see threads like this.

Jesus was adamant about correct doctrine...

48 posted on 01/02/2018 9:29:53 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Perhaps not specifically about circumcision but sermons about Christ and his relationship with the law of Moses are not uncommon at all. And they often use inference and analysis, which the original comment I was responding to suggests are just stumbling blocks.


49 posted on 01/02/2018 10:01:41 PM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: montag813

The Church’s epicycles? Can you support your contention that the Church invented epicycles?

In fact Copernicus relied even more heavily on epicycles than did Ptolemy, to square his Aristotelian assumption of circular orbits with actual observations of elliptical orbits. Epicycles were only solved by Kepler’s theory of elliptical orbits.

The Church has pretty much nothing to do with the transition from Copernicus to Kepler.


50 posted on 01/02/2018 10:15:55 PM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
"....That's where I quit reading and lose all respect for the author."...

Then you need to read your Bible a little closer.

If the RCC doesn't believe they are the Harlot, who do they say it is? The RCC has copied many things of the Babylonian religion. They killed more saints than all other entities on earth. That's what astonished John in Revelation. There were no popes until Constantine in the 300's AD. There are many more indications but I'm wasting my typing if you won't even read it. The fate of the church at Thyatira awaits you if you won't change.

51 posted on 01/03/2018 1:09:15 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Religion on FR.......
......................
In my mind religion is the kink in the
chain, we are supposed to live by every
Word that comes from god.

And you are right there are some things that
are hard to understand and we should not
Quibble over them unless we know what we are
talking about.

But your view of independent thinking is
different than mine,

If I am preaching the word to some one, it is not only your right but your reponsibility to correct me if I am lieing.

If we can take God’s word any way we want what was the object
of giving us his word?.


52 posted on 01/03/2018 1:43:12 AM PST by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain wodsView Replies, please but did not tk`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Blah blah blah


53 posted on 01/03/2018 2:20:22 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

You said it better than I could. also every one should take
very serious what Jesus said to the religious leaders of his
day.

You are of your father the devil, have religious leaders
become men of God? or are they still the wealthiest men in
the neighborhood?

There are a lot of preacheers who are poor but the ones I
know do not call them selves religious but
like the early Christians gave up every thing to follow
Christ.


54 posted on 01/03/2018 2:44:14 AM PST by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain wodsView Replies, please but did not tk`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
Are you saying He fulfilled the Old Covenant with his circumcision?

Yes - but not just with His circumcision. That would be reductive.

Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant and set up the New Covenant with His blood and sacrifice. A piece of that mystery occurs, or is revealed, or prefigured, at the circumcision. Another piece at the presentation at the Temple (40 days after birth). Another piece at His baptism in the Jordan.

But the whole thing - the whole mystery - culminates or is fully revealed at what we call the Passion. This is the term used for those events that took place from The Last Supper up to Christ's death.

I've assembled some passages below. If we were watching a film of Christ's life, we could imagine each of these being read out at both the circumcision and the crucifixion. All except for the last.

God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood — to be received by faith.

also

This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.

also

Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!

also

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.

and lastly:

After Jesus had taken the vinegar, He said, 'It is accomplished', and bowing his head he gave up his spirit.

This last passage doesn't fit as a voice-over during the circumcision. Because God's work is not accomplished at the circumcision. But the circumcision is a type or necessary precursor of the Passion.


We must be mindful that the Mosaic law isn't some accidental historical baggage that Christ had to deal with. Instead: it was created for Him and pointed the chosen people towards His salvific death and resurrection.

The Mosaic practice of circumcision was ordained by God because Christ would be circumcised - shedding his blood as a pre-figure of His Passion.

The Mosaic practice of blood sacrifice was ordained by God because Christ the Lamb of God would be sacrificed, at the Passion.

The Mosaic priesthood was ordained by God because one day Christ would be Priest as well as Victim - at the Passion.

And at the Passion the Law is fulfilled, in the sense of being brought to its proper and rightful end.

Christ bows His head. It is accomplished.

55 posted on 01/03/2018 3:18:13 AM PST by agere_contra (Please pray for Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
If the RCC doesn't believe they are the Harlot, who do they say it is?

The Whore is apostate Jerusalem. The Beast is pagan Rome.

Five kings have already fallen, the sixth now reigns, and the seventh is yet to come, but his reign will be brief

If five of these kings had fallen in John’s day and one of them was still in existence, then the Whore must also have existed in John’s day.

Yet Christian Rome and Vatican City did not exist in John's day.

However, pagan Rome did have a line of emperors. Most commentators see this as the line of kings to which Revelation 17:10 refers.

Hope this is helpful.

56 posted on 01/03/2018 3:56:50 AM PST by agere_contra (Please pray for Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I enjoy some of these even though I may not agree with all that is said. To me it’s a lot simpler - Christ walked the Earth under the Old Covenant and in order to be the only “Man” to live and stay totally within the Law, He needed to be circumcised - after h\His Death/Resurrection, many tried to keep adhering to the Law to “prove” their worthiness and they were chastised as having “fallen from Grace” by ignoring that His sacrifice was the only reason any could be deemed worthy.


57 posted on 01/03/2018 4:16:28 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone? I think Trump may give it back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Well, it’s an historical fact that he was not a Pope.


58 posted on 01/03/2018 5:51:40 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
I like Thomas's points. The first one in particular really stands out, because it's not a subject that we wise moderns think about very often.

First, in order to prove the reality of His human nature, in contradiction to the Manicheans, who said that He had an imaginary body: and in contradiction to Apollinarius, who said that Christ’s body was consubstantial with His Godhead; and in contradiction to Valentine, who said that Christ brought His body from heaven.

The reason that we don't worry about this now is because people like Thomas Aquinas, Albertus Magnus etc already did all the heavy lifting.

We know that Jesus Christ is True God and True Man. He was not a phantom; neither was He a mere human with a Divine brain, nor was He one of half-a-dozen variations on the same lame theme. He was - and is - and ever shall be - Incarnate God.

Half-bright moderns dismiss Thomas, thinking muddy thoughts about angels and pins. But where would we be, if we still had to argue whether or not Christ was God every time we talked about Him?

Thanks for sorting that stuff out, Thomas!

59 posted on 01/03/2018 6:23:34 AM PST by agere_contra (Please pray for Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Thank you for a reasoned response. How did Jerusalem fornicate with the kings of the world. Only the RCC did that since Rome to Henry the 8th.

It's neat how you called the Beast "pagan Rome". That's the whole point I was making. The Beast will be someone from Assyria. The false prophet will be a pope. It is located on 7 hills. It will be from the old Roman empire. Rev 17 :10-11 speaks of

Rev 17:10 There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time.

Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, is himself also the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.

The kingdoms in order are

Egypt

Assyria

Babylon ( Daniel 7:19:23)

Persia

Greece

Rome ( Rev 17:10-11)

And finally a new kingdom coming from the reconstituted Roman empire I call "Rome 2"

Many forget that the Roman Empire was Europe plus the Middle East and North Africa. They assume the Beast will be from Europe. The "One is" is Rome at the time of John. The one that was and is not is the 8th. The only empire that hasn't returned is Assyria. Assyria was, but has not returned.

Do a word search on "The Assyrian" and what you read will describe The coming Beast. Even the Pharaoh that forgot Joesph was an Assyrian Pharaoh.

Now as far as Israel,..They are Gods people. There is a replacement theology that is just antisemitism. The whole Bible is the relationship between God and His people. We have been "grafted in" or adopted into the Family of God, but Israel is still the center of attention all the way to Revelation. Jesus will come back on a white horse to rescue Israel from the antisemitic army on the Last Day. In Zech 12 and 13, God tells us Israel will repent when they see Jesus and His wounds in the Last days. Being the Bride of Christ is the best deal by far, but God will not leave His people and His covenant with them. We have a better covenant, but they were blinded to add us in to God's family.

Now back to the original principle. The RCC took pagan religion and spliced it into true Christianity by celebrating Dec 25th, the birth of Tammuz, celebrating Easter instead of Passover and First Fruits, adding Halloween, and New years. The Bible gives us days to celebrate in Leviticus 23 and we refuse. The RCC forbids to marry which is doctrines of demons. The RCC worships Madonna and child, which is straight out of Semiramis and Tammuz. If you bow before a statue of anybody, including Mary and pray to them, that is idol worship and blasphemy.

That's enough for now, but I still wanted to thank you for at least making a civil response for real discussion.

Please read Revelation 2 and the letter to Thyatira and see if anything there could apply to RCC's. You can still go in the Rapture, you don't have to be numbered with the ones left behind in the Tribulation. It sounds to me like the Beast will treat the RCC particularly bad. You will be ruled with a rod of iron and dashed to pieces. Sickness and the plagues will strike you. All I ask is to put some study into this before the last days. If you are still convinced, then well and good. I and others just see things that others don't seem to see, and we do care. If we can never speak to each other in civil terms, there will never be change. I had hope the present pope would open some eyes about infallibility and God's Vicar hearing directly from God. He is obviously just a liberal man that reads scripture very different than most. I don't know where the line will be, but at some point he will bless gay marriage, bless sodomy, bless abortion, or change thousands of years of tradition that should open some eyes. It has to come from within the church because you will never listen to someone who is not a Catholic.

The real church will look more like Jesus' church in the first century. They were converted Jews that still went to Synagogue and followed Leviticus 23, just as Jesus did. Denomination is the "traditions of men" spoken of in Scripture. We have been freed from the oral law and His yoke is easy and His burden is light. If I had one available, I would attend a Messianic church because they have an understanding I'm still learning. All I know is a Christian denomination misses much of what Jesus taught because they are not Jews. For Salvation, all you need is faith that Jesus was the Son of God, come in the flesh, and He gave His life to pay my sin price, and I belong to Him forevermore. Salvation and Rapture are two separate things however. I for one don't want to meet the Beast.

60 posted on 01/03/2018 11:47:56 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson