Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strategies for Returning to the [Catholic] Church
CE.com ^ | 01-11-18 | James Day

Posted on 01/11/2018 6:54:52 PM PST by Salvation

Strategies for Returning to the Church

James Day

Our world is a fallen world. The effects of sin seem to be suffocating us. The diabolical is running rampant, unleashed, playing with immortal souls as if puppets on a string. Pride continues to dominate; repentance for anything is deemed archaic, of little use to today’s enlightened thinking.

Certainly this is not the positive language one wants to hear at the outset of a new year, when expectations and resolutions are running high. But all is not really so dire: the diabolical and pervasive sin has not crushed the divine light. “My Immaculate Heart will triumph,” promises the Lady of Fatima. There is a reason the Church opens a new year honoring the Mother of God: obedience to accepting one’s mission in life is the most daunting — and exciting — prospect we face on this earth. We have a guidebook in how to do it through Mary’s fiat.

Perhaps over holiday festivities and the euphoria — and stress — of families coming together, some readers might have encountered resistance from relatives regarding the graces offered in entering the mystery of faith during this holy season. Whether it was avoidance from some in either attending Christmas Mass or praying before a Christmas dinner, such discomforts surely existed. While certainly everyone is different, with their own freedom and right to privacy, perhaps there are some of you readers whose own children—raised in the Catholic faith you so diligently sought to instill in them — want nothing to do with it anymore. It is to this element I wish to address.

In my own experience, generally speaking, I have found degrees of toleration from lapsed or non-Catholics regarding matters of the faith — they know the Catholic Church continues to play an enormous part in global affairs while recalling their own experiences either through schooling or parish life. I have found that while the pervading motif of the millennial generation is a general shunning towards organized religion and regular church attendance, there yet remains a desire for an experience of the transcendent. And that desire is the silver lining.

Unfortunately, committed Catholics are not always quite the fearless galvanized evangelizers that each one is called to be. Marveling that St. Francis de Sales converted 40,000 is usually met with a shrug: “Well, that’s why he’s a saint.” But that’s the precisely the mentality that needs to change.

A Jesuit once posed in a homily, “Listen to conversations. How long does it take before God is ever mentioned?” Out of not wanting to create controversy, God is never mentioned. When he is, or when the Church is mentioned, Catholics are immediately put on the defensive. We can stay silent, letting the Uber driver, for example, have his say about the occultish practice of Catholics (as I experienced recently), or we can defend Holy Mother Church, as we would defend our own mother, and begin a conversation. The faith is not part of the pie of life. It is the pie.

I have come to believe that, in this era, accommodation will not work. Appeasing the culture may seem like a conciliatory gesture, but those on the opposite side most probably will not respect such compromise—even if they do not agree with the position in question. In reading Paul Kengor’s new book, A Pope and a President, on President Reagan and Pope St. John Paul II’s battles against communism, the consistency in the Church’s long running condemnation of communism as far back as Pius IX is impressive. The Church may have apologized for grievous actions throughout its long history, but it has never apologized for being magnificent.

So, how to engage your lapsed love one on returning to the Church? After all, that is our sole duty—to grow into our authentic selves, made in the image of God, and safeguard our immortal souls and those of others towards eternal life. Remembering we can only extend an invitation, a proposal, respecting the freedom of others, here are some strategies:

I: Know Thyself

Be yourself a model of virtue.

Live the Gospel, avoiding hypocrisy, condemnation of others, descent into pettiness. If you consider yourself a Catholic first and desire others to feel that same zeal, your example is the best model. Just like Mary.

Avoid “preaching.”

Respectfully engage in conversation in whatever topic arises. Listen to the other person. Avoid shouting or screaming. Do not let a discussion become an argument or a fight. But know the teachings rather than relying on your own emotions in the heat of the moment.

Pray constantly (1 Thessalonians 5:16).

Read Scripture daily, particularly the Gospels, alone or with family. Have the Catechism handy. Always be reading a spiritual work. Your own edification will inevitably seep into your own worldview. Petition the Trinity for guidance. Ask saints for intercession. Call on the Blessed Mother multiple times a day.

Know your own spiritual story.

What were the integral moments for you in your faith formation? Where did God reveal Himself? Write your own spiritual autobiography in a way that you find creative and inspiring. “Know thyself” is not just an ancient Greek saying. It’s vital to one’s own development.

“Pray the Mass,” as St. Pius X instructs.

Throw your fears and pains onto the altar. Bow your head at the Consecration; respect the Real Presence of Jesus Christ.

II: Extend an Invitation

Know the story of your lapsed child or loved one.

“Communication is simply mutual understanding,” says Stephen R. Covey. You have to care about who they are, where they’ve been, and where they want to go — while you are called to evangelize, you cannot treat them as an agenda, a project. In this way, study Ignatian spirituality for insight on the discernment of spirits. You are always an unofficial spiritual director to someone!

Find common ground.

There are many launching points one can meet due to the richness of the Catholic faith. Unfortunately, many lapsed Catholics have a distorted or misinformed view of the faith, just as many in the Protestant and evangelical world have a Reformation-era concept of the papacy. Much time may be spent on clearing the cobwebs on the reality of the Catholic Church today. Yes, corruption and scandal and atrocities have weakened the moral authority of the Church. But there is a difference between human failings and the Church as founded by Christ handed to Saint Peter (Matthew 16:18). That needs to be made clear. (See Joseph Ratzinger, “Why I Am Still in the Church.”)

Nurture their interests.

“For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Luke 12:34). Getting to know your loved one authentically and establishing common ground will offer new avenues of appreciation. Are they artists, musicians, poets, writers? Michelangelo, Gaudi, chant, or the great classics of literature offer beautiful immersive experiences in the Catholic worldview.

Pope Francis has been an inspiration for those of any background, through his environment work, Laudato Si, or his call for activism towards migrants, refugees, the disenfranchised.

Connect them with possibly like minded individuals who might continue the conversation, depending on their interests: educators, bioethicists, Father Spitzer’s Magis Institute on science, faith, and reason. Historical subjects on the veracity of Jesus: the Shroud of Turin, for example (see Ian Wilson’s The Shroud, among others).

Give your lapsed child or loved one Matthew Kelly’s Rediscover Catholicism or a similar book that perhaps impacted you. Rediscover appeals to the mainstream, ringing distant bells they would have remembered growing up Catholic. In many ways, that book is an appetizer to what awaits.

Bottom line: communicate the resources provided by so many apostolates—there is something for everyone. Many of those actively engaged in the mission of salvation, the mission of the Church, were once lapsed themselves. Just ask St. Augustine, Dorothy Day, or many great evangelizers in our day and age.

Invite your lapsed child or loved one to Confession.

It’s a challenging invitation. But you’ve at least put it out there. At the same time, do not let the graces of Confession become distorted. While one receives absolution, authentic penance comes when one’s life is turned around. So often the thought is that a few “Hail Marys” and “Our Fathers” is all the Church demands for conciliation. Actually, one must authentically set out determined to begin anew, a new person, transformed. Vinny Flynn’s 7 Secrets of Confession is a powerful little book for guidance.

Extend an invitation to Mass.

Bring an extra copy of Magnificat or a book with daily readings and give your loved one a copy. Sit up close. And then pray the Mass. Together.

Give your loved one Benedict XVI’s Jesus of Nazareth.

Along with the timelessness of the Scriptures themselves, this trilogy is written for people of our time to rediscover Christ. It is some of the most staggering spiritual reading you will encounter.

III: Going Forward

Three very simple, practical steps:

Happy New Year!



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; evangelization; prayer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 661-674 next last
To: af_vet_1981
 
 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, 
 
Call no man Father?

561 posted on 01/17/2018 3:32:12 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Believers are commanded to “study to show themselves approved, rightly handling the Word of Truth.”

Real ones; that is.

Catholic believers are commanded to “Accept wholeheartedly what Rome tells you is FACT, for only SHE rightly handles the Word of Truth.

562 posted on 01/17/2018 3:34:48 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Where are the Catholic ‘Bereans’ of today??


563 posted on 01/17/2018 3:35:24 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

I suspect it is.


564 posted on 01/17/2018 3:45:00 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Said Harvey to the lass on the couch,
‘If this hurts, you’d better yell “OUCH!”
‘Do it right away,
‘Not some far off late day;
‘for no one your story will vouch.’


565 posted on 01/17/2018 3:45:01 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: metmom
I SWEAR I had clothes on when I left the castle!!



566 posted on 01/17/2018 3:49:01 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
It's time for ALL of us to read some Scripture...

2 Timothy 2:14 

Remind them of these things, and solemnly charge them in the presence of God
not to wrangle about words, which is useless and leads to the ruin of the hearers.

567 posted on 01/17/2018 3:54:47 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Where are the Catholic ‘Bereans’ of today??

Many of them are here. 😄😀 I like dealing with Berean Catholics. They listen more closely, and ask intelligent questions. 👍

568 posted on 01/17/2018 4:03:54 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
Moreover, while in John 1:42 Jesus told Simon that he would be called "Cephas," as well as assigming that label to him, nowhere in the Greek or the KJV/AV does it ever appear that He personally or familiarly addressed Simon bar Jona as "Cephas" or as "Petros."

The argument from silence does not prove the Messiah did not call him Cephas/Kephas. He very well could have.

The Messiah's naming of Simon Bar Jona as Cephas/Kephas/Peter reminds me of Jacob/Israel, except in the case of Jacob/Israel there is no argument from silence as there is scriptural proof that cannot credibly be denied. Peter, like Jacob, is oft maligned, yet both have power with God. We can all rejoice in that:

And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob. And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed. And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he blessed him there. And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.

...

And God appeared unto Jacob again, when he came out of Padan-aram, and blessed him. And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel. And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins; And the land which I gave Abraham and Isaac, to thee I will give it, and to thy seed after thee will I give the land. And God went up from him in the place where he talked with him. And Jacob set up a pillar in the place where he talked with him, even a pillar of stone: and he poured a drink offering thereon, and he poured oil thereon. And Jacob called the name of the place where God spake with him, Bethel.

...

Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

...

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.


Genesis, Catholic chapter thirty two, Protestant verses twenty seven to thirty two,
Genesis, Catholic chapter thirty two, Protestant verses twenty nine to fifteen,
Matthew, Catholic chapter nineteen, Protestant verses twenty seven to twenty eight,
Revelation, Catholic chapter twenty, Protestant verse four,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

569 posted on 01/17/2018 4:50:37 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; Mark17; Elsie
I appreciate your note that has some beautiful passages in it. And as I noted in replies upthread, I believe that Jesus' choice of Simon as a disciple was to show that even the most unlikely could be made useful to furthering the Gospel and applying it. It is instructive to examine Simon's conduct to see how one's own could be improved. Mine, for instance, for it is clear that I take after Simon in many ways.

There is but a razor-thin margin between Simon's salvation and the Iscariot's loss: the difference is in the heart, not so much in the mind. With His omniscience Jesus knew ahead of time, way ahead. I just don't believe it is appropriate to put Simon on a pedestal, then or now.

But thanks for your note.

The argument from silence does not prove the Messiah did not call him Cephas/Kephas. He very well could have.

Nor does your argument on the same basis prove that Jesus ever did. But since the silence of the issue is an inspired, inerrant, complete silence, I take the absence of Jesus use of "Peter" to address him, combined with the very positive indication in an intimate vignette more convincing:

The risen Jesus: "Simon of Jonas, lovestἀγαπάω = sovereignly prefer thou me morefully than thesethan the others do?
Simon: "Yea, Lord; thou knowestperceive that I loveφιλέω = have affection for thee."
Jesus: "Feednurse my lambslittle ones."

(perhaps a contemplative pause?)

Jesus: "Simon of Jonas, lovestἀγαπάω = sovereignly prefer thou me?
Simon: "Yea, Lord; thou knowestperceive that I loveφιλέω = have affection for thee."
Jesus: "Feedtake to pasture my sheepgrown ones."

(another thoughtful moment?)

Jesus (pressing a bit?): "Simon of Jonas, lovestsup>φιλέω = have affection for thou me?
Simon (Peter) (aggrieved at the insistence and alteration of the kind of love mentioned): "Lord, thou knowestperceivehave knowledge that I lovehave affection for thee."
Jesus: "Feedbring fodder to my sheepgrown ones." Jesus then tells Simon of his future.

I would think that if Jesus was in the habit of addressing him by his common nickname, that it would be here, if anywhere. But again, that's just an unproveable hypothesis, not a doctrine. More than anything, my opinion is that this little vignette is the point at which Simon is shown that the six denials of the trial night did not cause Jesus to dismiss him, but rather encouraged Simon to keep trusting in Him and keep on with the ministry, as the others were.

Well, so much for the primacy of "Peter" as "Pope," I hope.

570 posted on 01/17/2018 7:02:15 AM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

This is made clear by the context. The reference to John’s greatness occurs in a discussion of his role as a prophet (11:7-15). And the declaration of his greatness is occasioned by Jesus quoting the prophecy of the coming prophet (v. 10) who would herald the Messiah (Mal. 3:1). Jesus follows up the remark by pointing to John as the terminus of the Law and the prophets (v. 13) and as the fulfillment of the prophecy that Elijah (or one like Elijah) would come (v. 14).

This explains the sense in which John is greater than all others: He is the greatest of the pre-Christian prophets in the sense that he gets to be the herald of the Messiah himself. Indeed, some manuscripts of Luke’s Gospel give the parallel to this saying as, “I tell you, among those born of women no prophet is greater than John the Baptist” (Luke 7:28, var.). Needless to say, the class of Old Testament prophets is a set to which Mary does not belong.

Further, Jesus’ universe of discourse at this point is limited by another factor: time. “The kingdom of heaven” refers to the Christian age, to the Church that Jesus will found. John thus may be the most blessed of the line of Old Covenant prophets because he is the Messiah’s herald, but even the humblest Christian will be more blessed than John is. And of course Mary-unlike John-lived into the Christian age and became part of the Church.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-universe-of-discourse


571 posted on 01/17/2018 7:14:24 AM PST by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Wrangling is not studios discourse over tenses, vices, moods, cases, etc. that when properly presented, removes the hearer from believing in false doctrine into the presence of the true. Just knowing how the present tense of the Greek is used can wipe out the English ambiguousness thst leads one to think that one's salvation, a gift from God, can be lost.

For The God so lovedsovereignly preferred over self and others the world, so that He gave His Only Begotten Son in order that everyone persistently committing trust unto Him subjunctivenot perish, but subjunctivecontinually have eternal absolute life."

The present tense clearly impresses the Greek-thinker that salvific trusting is a continually ongoing process, in which the regenerated (born-anew) spiritual being cannot and will not revert to the old life of the worldling. If he/she even thought about it, they should know and remember that The Holy Spirit will not permit it. He may even administer physical death, if necessary, to see that cessation of one's trust does not occur. Removal from the temporal to the eternal will ensure that the saved person continues life for ever.

The Scripture does not suggest backsliding for the truly saved person. It is not an option.

2 Cor.13:5 AV:
"Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?"

The God, The Father of regenerated believers, is not just some Big Celestial Buddy of theirs:

Heb 12:7-8 AV:
"If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons."

Applying the sense of the Greekiness of the present tense should solve the "salvation by works" issue permanently, without "wrangling."

572 posted on 01/17/2018 7:54:01 AM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM; aMorePerfectUnion; ealgeone
I think the whole thing comes down to one issue. You believe Mary was sinless. I don’t believe she was. Blessed among women, yes. One who should be admired and respected, yes. One who is a sinless demigoddess, no. I have a feeling we are NEVER going to agree on this, so I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
So, where do you plan to spend eternity? In the same place as me? Interesting subject isn’t it?
573 posted on 01/17/2018 8:01:41 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: Mark17; ADSUM
I think the whole thing comes down to one issue. You believe Mary was sinless. I don’t believe she was.

Not only that...the Roman Catholic has to believe this...if not, they are no longer a Roman Catholic and are condemned. It should be noted this is not a New Testament requirement for faith.

Hence, if anyone shall dare — which God forbid! — to think otherwise than as has been defined by us, let him know and understand that he is condemned by his own judgment; that he has suffered shipwreck in the faith; that he has separated from the unity of the Church; and that, furthermore, by his own action he incurs the penalties established by law if he should are to express in words or writing or by any other outward means the errors he think in his heart.http://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9ineff.htm

574 posted on 01/17/2018 8:24:35 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; imardmd1
Correction to Post #572:

"Wrangling is not studious discourse over tenses, voices, moods, cases, etc."

575 posted on 01/17/2018 8:38:56 AM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
The argument from silence does not prove the Messiah did not call him Cephas/Kephas. He very well could have.

He very well could have.

He very well could have.

He very well could have.

What you are witnessing is the Roman Basis of Truth!

God Could Have Done it that Way!!!!

Yes, once the facts do not support a Roman belief, there is a quick turn to "God could have done it that way."

Isn't it amazing that most of the key beliefs of Romanism are not to be found in the Scriptures and only in Hopium??

576 posted on 01/17/2018 9:38:37 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM
And of course Mary-unlike John-lived into the Christian age and became part of the Church.

Not!

Mary was the fulfillment of prophecies about Messiah, made to Jews
Mary lived before she bore Messiah - as a Jew
The Holy Spirit had not yet been poured out at Pentecost.
Christ had not yet died

In summary, your quoted link is just not true Adsum.

577 posted on 01/17/2018 10:23:27 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM; aMorePerfectUnion
I don't think you really want to rely upon Tim Staples' for your apologetics.

Would he really apply the limited discourse argument to John 6??

578 posted on 01/17/2018 10:39:44 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

No worry, I know the difference between a Bible discussion and
a religious discussion, entirely my fault.


579 posted on 01/17/2018 11:10:08 AM PST by ravenwolf (Left lane tdrivers and tailgaters are the smallest peabrains in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

The catholic organization is not The Body of ALL believers relying on Jesus as Savior and Lord. Your continued purposed conflation of church and Church (The true body of all in His body of believers) is duly noted for the deceit it is.


580 posted on 01/17/2018 1:06:34 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 661-674 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson