Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

...A Concern for the Protestant “Solos”: Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura, Sola Gratia
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 06-07-18 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 06/08/2018 8:54:57 AM PDT by Salvation

Beware the “Soloists” - A Concern for the Protestant “Solos”: Sola Fide, Sola Scriptura, Sola Gratia

June 7, 2018

There are a lot of “solos” sung by our Protestant brethren: sola fide (saved by faith alone), sola Scriptura (Scripture alone is the rule of faith), and sola gratia (grace alone). Generally, one ought to be leery of claims that things work “alone.” Typically, many things work together in harmony; things are interrelated. Very seldom is anyone or anything really “alone.”

The problem with “solos” emerges (it seems to me) in our mind, where it is possible to separate things out; but just because we can separate something out in our mind does not mean that we can do so in reality.

Consider, for a moment, a candle’s flame. In my mind, I can separate the heat of the flame from its light, but I could never put a knife into the flame and put the heat of the flame on one side of it and the light on the other. In reality, the heat and light are inseparable—so together as to be one.

I would like to argue that it is the same with things like faith and works, grace and transformation, Scripture and the Church. We can separate all these things out in our mind, but in reality, they are one. Attempting to separate them from what they belong to leads to grave distortions and to the thing in question no longer being what it is claimed to be. Rather, it becomes an abstraction that exists only on a blackboard or in the mind of a theologian.

Let’s look at the three main “solos” of Protestant theology. I am aware that there are non-Catholic readers of this blog, so please understand that my objections are made with respect. I am also aware that in a short blog I may oversimplify, and thus I welcome additions, clarifications, etc. in the comments section.

Solo 1: Faith alone (sola fide)For 400 years, Catholics and Protestants have debated the question of faith and works. In this matter, we must each avoid caricaturing the other’s position. Catholics do not and never have taught that we are saved by works. For Heaven’s sake, we baptize infants! We fought off the Pelagians. But neither do Protestants mean by “faith” a purely intellectual acceptance of the existence of God, as many Catholics think that they do.

What concerns us here is the detachment of faith from works that the phrase “faith alone” implies. Let me ask, what is faith without works? Can you point to it? Is it visible? Introduce me to someone who has real faith but no works. I don’t think one can be found. About the only example I can think of is a baptized infant, but that’s a Catholic thing! Most Baptists and Evangelicals who sing the solos reject infant baptism.

Hence it seems that faith alone is something of an abstraction. Faith is something that can only be separated from works in our minds. If faith is a transformative relationship with Jesus Christ, we cannot enter into that relationship while remaining unchanged. This change affects our behavior, our works. Even in the case of infants, it is possible to argue that they are changed and do have “works”; it’s just that they are not easily observed.

Scripture affirms that faith is never alone, that such a concept is an abstraction. Faith without works is dead (James 2:26). Faith without works is not faith at all because faith does not exist by itself; it is always present with and causes works through love. Galatians 5:6 says, For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision; but faith working through love. Hence faith works not alone but through love. Further, as Paul states in 1 Corinthians 13:2, if I have all faith so as to move mountains but do not have love, I am nothing.

Hence faith alone is the null set. True faith is never alone; it bears the fruit of love and the works of holiness. Faith ignites love and works through it. Beware of the solo “faith alone” and ask where faith, all by itself, can be found.

Solo 2: Grace alone (sola gratia) – By its very nature grace changes us. Again, show me grace apart from works. Grace without works is an abstraction. It cannot be found apart from its effects. In our mind it may exist as an idea, but in reality, grace is never alone.

Grace builds on nature and transforms it. It engages the person who responds to its urges and gifts. If grace is real, it will have its effects and cannot be found alone or apart from works. It cannot be found apart from a real flesh-and-blood human who is manifesting its effects.

Solo 3: Scripture alone (sola Scriptura) – Beware those who say, “sola Scriptura!” This is the claim that Scripture alone is the measure of faith and the sole authority for the Christian, that there is no need for a Church and no authority in the Church, that there is only authority in the Scripture.

There are several problems with this.

First, Scripture as we know it (with the full New Testament) was not fully assembled and agreed upon until the 4th century.

It was Catholic bishops, in union with the Pope, who made the decision as to which books belonged in the Bible. The early Christians could not possibly have lived by sola scriptura because the Scriptures were not even fully written in the earliest years. And although collected and largely completed in written form by 100 AD, the set of books and letters that actually made up the New Testament was not agreed upon until the 4th century.

Second, until recently most people could not read.

Given this, it seems strange that God would make, as the sole rule of faith, a book that people had to read on their own. Even today, large numbers of people in the world cannot read well. Hence, Scripture was not necessarily a read text, but rather one that most people heard and experienced in and with the Church through her preaching, liturgy, art, architecture, stained glass, passion plays, and so forth.

Third, and most important, if all you have is a book, then that book needs to be interpreted accurately.

Without a valid and recognized interpreter, the book can serve to divide more than to unite. Is this not the experience of Protestantism, which now has tens of thousands of denominations all claiming to read the same Bible but interpreting it in rather different manners?

The problem is, if no one is Pope then everyone is Pope! Protestant “soloists” claim that anyone, alone with a Bible and the Holy Spirit, can authentically interpret Scripture. Well then, why does the Holy Spirit tell some people that baptism is necessary for salvation and others that it is not necessary? Why does the Holy Spirit tell some that the Eucharist really is Christ’s Body and Blood and others that it is only a symbol? Why does the Holy Spirit say to some Protestants, “Once saved, always saved” and to others, “No”?

So, it seems clear that Scripture is not meant to be alone. Scripture itself says this in 2 Peter 3:16: our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, also wrote to you, Our Brother Paul speaking of these things [the Last things] as he does in all his letters. In them there are some things hard to understand that the ignorant and unstable distort to their own destruction, just as they do the other scriptures. Hence Scripture itself warns that it is quite possible to misinterpret Scripture.

Where is the truth to be found? The Scriptures once again answer this: you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth (1 Tim 3:15).

Hence Scripture is not to be read alone. It is a document of the Lord through the Church and must be read in the context of the Church and with the Church’s authoritative interpretation and Tradition. As this passage from Timothy says, the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth. The Bible is a Church book and thus is not meant to be read apart from the Church that received the authority to publish it from God Himself. Scripture is the most authoritative and precious document of the Church, but it emanates from the Church’s Tradition and must be understood in the light of it.

Thus, the problems of “singing solo” seem to boil down to the fact that if we separate what God has joined we end up with an abstraction, something that exists only in the mind but in reality, cannot be found alone.

Here is a brief video in which Fr. Robert Barron ponders the Protestant point of view that every baptized Christian has the right to authoritatively interpret the Word of God.sss


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; solopopeus; soylo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-779 next last
To: boatbums

It is my opinion that the Catholic Church wrote, gathered, canonized, and preserved Sacred Scripture, through its teachings and traditions.


201 posted on 06/08/2018 7:47:55 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You skipped over my post #44 or you wouldn't have asked.

And as for the words of Christ:

Matt 24:12 And because of the increase of lawlessness, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, “Very truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.
In His parting words to his disciples He said,

Mark 16:16 The one who believes and is baptized will be saved; but the one who does not believe will be condemned.

Matt 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Matt 16:27 “For the Son of Man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay everyone for what has been done.

Matt 19:16 Then someone came to him and said, “Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?” 17 And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.”

Matt 22:37 He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the greatest and first commandment. 39 And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” Matt 24:12 And because of the increase of lawlessness, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

Matt 25:21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.’

202 posted on 06/08/2018 7:52:25 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: G Larry; Luircin; metmom; aMorePerfectUnion
Christ never told his disciples to write Scripture, he told them to teach and preach all that I have taught you.

Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this in a book as a memorial and recite it to Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.” Exodus 17:14 NASB

Now the Lord said to Moses, “Cut out for yourself two stone tablets like the former ones, and I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets which you shattered. Exodus 34:1 NASB

Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write down these words, for in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.” Exodus 34:27 NASB

I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets which you shattered, and you shall put them in the ark.’ Deut 10:2

Do not let kindness and truth leave you; Bind them around your neck, Write them on the tablet of your heart. Proverbs 3:3 NASB

but that we write to them that they abstain from things contaminated by idols and from fornication and from what is strangled and from blood. Acts 15:20 NASB

For we write nothing else to you than what you read and understand, and I hope you will understand until the end; 2 Corinthians 1:13 NASB

1Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us, 2just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, 3it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order, most excellent Theophilus; 4so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught. Luke 1:1-4 NASB

13These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life. 1 John 5:13 NASB

Not to mention all the other places in the NT and OT where people were either moved to write or told to write.

Guess these guys were just bored sitting around with nothing to do?

203 posted on 06/08/2018 7:54:05 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Sonny, have you ever tried following a thread?

Are you really trying to elevate the Book of Revelation to a Gospel?

I made very clear early on that Christ never instructed his disciples to reduce his teachings to writing. Rather he told them to go and preach to all nations.

Revelations is NOT about teaching the Gospels to the nations.
It is about warnings of things to come.


204 posted on 06/08/2018 7:56:59 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

That was one of the least responsive answers I’ve ever received.


205 posted on 06/08/2018 7:57:07 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Luircin; Salvation; G Larry; metmom; aMorePerfectUnion; boatbums; Mom MD
If you say that Scripture was compiled according to ‘tradition,’ that means that they only put things into it that matched what they had been taught: IE, canon.

And now you’re getting upset at us that we’re using this measure to test Rome’s theology, and Rome’s theology is coming up so painfully short that you have to argue AGAINST the Scripture that YOU claimed that they assembled.

Of all the things I've seen that rile up the Roman Catholics the most is when their false doctrines are compared to Scripture.

The one that really stirs the pot is the Immaculate Conception.

Indeed....Rome's own Catholic Encyclopedia online admits: No direct or categorical and stringent proof of the dogma can be brought forward from Scripture.

Rome claims their doctrines/"traditions" are derived from Scripture....yet this dogma, which RCs have to believe, is admitted not to be found in Scripture.

But Rome cannot back down and admit their error on this. If they did, it would practically destroy the Roman Catholic church as it has invested so heavily in the worship of Mary.

206 posted on 06/08/2018 8:00:29 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

I haven’t the slightest idea what you just accused me of this time around, unless you’re still accusing me of teaching NOT to do good works.

Which is false, and also against the RF rules against mind-reading.

But I recommend that you stop trying to read my mind, take a deep breath, take a break, and come back later when you’re not so angry.


207 posted on 06/08/2018 8:00:39 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

https://carm.org/manuscript-evidence

NT was well documented in the 1st century....


208 posted on 06/08/2018 8:01:19 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

That last request might be a while!


209 posted on 06/08/2018 8:01:21 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

Comment #210 Removed by Moderator

To: G Larry; boatbums
It is my opinion that the Catholic Church wrote, gathered, canonized, and preserved Sacred Scripture, through its teachings and traditions.

And your opinion has been shown to be in error.

211 posted on 06/08/2018 8:03:19 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: G Larry; ealgeone

Your abusive posting and flame baiting has just been reported.


212 posted on 06/08/2018 8:03:38 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: G Larry; MHGinTN; Luircin; metmom; boatbums; Mom MD; aMorePerfectUnion
Are you really trying to elevate the Book of Revelation to a Gospel?

Are you saying some books of the NT are "worth" more than others??

213 posted on 06/08/2018 8:04:57 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

In fact, as I recall, Revelation is the only book that promises a blessing for reading it.


214 posted on 06/08/2018 8:07:28 PM PDT by Mom MD ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

If I had to choose between God’s Word or religion of any flavor, I am choosing His Word EVERY TIME

Religion is bondage. God’s Truth MAKES you free.


215 posted on 06/08/2018 8:07:30 PM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Well Johnny come lately, must not have started at post 24.

No, I've been following the thread. Just now catching up to you. Which I see not much has changed in your approach. It is a temperament I'm noticing with many Roman Catholics though.

We have already excluded God’s instruction to the prophets in the OT.

Not sure who this "we" is you're discussing.

However, I haven't.

You may want to go back and read....or re-read the OT.

216 posted on 06/08/2018 8:09:48 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

Comment #217 Removed by Moderator

To: Mom MD

And IIRC a warning for adding to it.


218 posted on 06/08/2018 8:10:30 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“But Rome cannot back down and admit their error on this. If they did, it would practically destroy the Roman Catholic church as it has invested so heavily in the worship of Mary.”

+1


219 posted on 06/08/2018 8:11:58 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

What are you talking about?

You haven’t “followed” anything.

The discussion has been about the fact that Christ, in the Gospels, NEVER instructed His disciples to “write” anything. Rather He instructed them to “teach” and “preach”.


220 posted on 06/08/2018 8:13:15 PM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-779 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson