Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unconditional Election (calvinism)vs. Bible Truth: "God...desires ALL men to be saved" 1Ti2:3,4
http://home.kscable.com/winfieldcofc/newspaper/03election.htm ^ | Clint Brown

Posted on 05/29/2002 7:49:02 PM PDT by xzins

Unconditional Election vs. Bible Truth

"God, our Savior... desires all men to be saved." (I Tim. 2:3,4)

Clint Brown

Logic dictates that any doctrine which implies a false doctrine is itself, false. The Calvinistic doctrine of Unconditional Particular Election implies an egregiously false doctrine, and is therefore, false. This doctrine, often called Predestination, is explained by one of its defenders as "the eternal decree of God, by which he has determined in himself, what he would have to become of every individual... For they are not all created with a similar destiny; but eternal life is foreordained for some, and eternal damn-ation for others" [Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol. 1, p. 342].

The chief implication of this doctrine is that God is responsible for souls that are lost in hell. To remedy this heretical notion, Calvinists assert that God's choice is "based solely on His own good pleasure and sovereign will" [Steele & Thomas, The Five Points of Calvinism (Presbyterian and Reformed Pub. Co.), p. 30].

Calvinistic predestination is actually a misapplication of the sovereignty of God. While God does have an immutable counsel (Heb. 6:17), He may not supercede the limitations set by His own moral nature (e.g., Heb. 6:18). The doctrine of Unconditional Election repudiates the single most profound act of the moral nature of God's will – the creation of mankind "in His image" (Gen. 1:26). Since man is "in His image," he possesses a real moral nature and is capable of making real moral choices that affect his real eternal destiny! But if God has arbitrarily predetermined every individual's ultimate destiny, we are essentially robots, incapable of affecting our eternal future.

God derives no pleasure from the service of automatons (cf. Amos 5:21-24). Rather, He desires a reciprocal love freely offered by His moral creatures. Of all physical creation, only mankind possesses the ability to respond to the loving grace of the Creator through the loving obedience of faith. Contrary to the indictment of God's justice provided by Calvinistic predestination, the Bible says that God desires all men to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth (1 Tim. 2:4). Contrary to the heretical implication of Unconditional Election, God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Pet. 3:9).

Though not all will be saved, the choice is yours.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: choice; preselection; toheaven; tohell; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: rwfromkansas
Nice response.
61 posted on 05/31/2002 10:57:25 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
yep
62 posted on 05/31/2002 11:05:28 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Go RW !
63 posted on 05/31/2002 11:05:58 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2;RnMomof7;RwfromKansas
Is that too much to ask?

For five centuries it's been too much to ask. Nothing receives such ignorant vitriol as Calvinism.

So I figure, we must be doing something right.

Reformed theology is the ONE theology that acknowledges God's total, complete sovereignty. And that's what drives them crazy.

Men want control over themselves; but they mostly want control over other people. Calvinism denies them this power which is God's alone.

No King but Christ.

64 posted on 05/31/2002 11:07:15 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg;dittoJed2
I agree...If the gospel you preach is not offensive it is not the gospel...

I take heart that we may be spit on and defamed....that is exactly what they did to the one that first preached it........Men love the darkness and hate the light. That alone should be proof of the Doctrines of Grace to those with spiritual eyes

65 posted on 05/31/2002 11:11:37 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer, Rnmomof7
I hope Rnmomof7 is okay with me posting these. Here are some postings, with links to the threads, from Rnmomof7 that show just how much of a rabid Arminian she USED to be:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b6f2e397a0a.htm#269

To: the_doc,P-Marlowe,Patriotic Teen,drot

You're right. She did. By her sarcasm. So did you.

doc here is a shocker for you..I realized that it is YOU that has blasphemed

I have listened for days on end where believers..saved by the Blood of Jesus...through the conviction of the Holy Spirit have been called reprobates,liars,and lost. all because they do not agree with you.

Well scripture say only one sin is unforgivable (no matter what Calvin says)and that is the sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit...you have done this over and over in these threads...calling the Holy Spirit of no effect and denying His witness in the hearts of men,denying His power..

It is interesting scripture also warns "touch not my annointed"..seems to me that these two scriptures may go together doc..

You just may be forever lost without Hope..because no exception for the followers of Calvin were written into that warning!

269 Posted on 08/08/2001 11:12:40 PDT by RnMomof7 [ Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | Top | Last ]

Another:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b72899555b3.htm#86

(My note before the post from Rn:I urge you....please do NOT read this thread....I have and it has grieved my spirit greatly seeing such a horrid amount of hate being spewed by both sides.....this is one of the most dirty threads on the subject.....please avoid it except to confirm my quote of Rn as accurate. Now, to the post:)

right some men will choose to stay in that burning building..but not because God withheld his grace..but because they refused to hear..they will deserve hells fire..I will weep for them ,but I understand the sovereignity of God in this..

There is no free will with out Gods grace .

No I was not aware of the things of God before that time..but in retrospect I have many memories of Him reaching out to me..I didnt realize it but He was there all the time..(they may not make sense but that is all I can say)

128 Posted on 08/10/2001 19:57:40 PDT by RnMomof7 [ Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | Top | Last ]

Again, please NOTE THAT THESE ARE NOT STATEMENTS RNMOMOF7 WOULD AGREE WITH NOW SO DON'T ADDRESS HER COMMENTS. These are statements she made about Calvinism before being convinced of its truthness. You can see she was a rather rabid Arminian indeed and had no "attraction" to it at all. I am amazed in that these posts are just from late last year even. What a change a few months makes.

66 posted on 06/01/2002 12:07:58 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas, Rnmomof7
Also, if you are not okay with me posting those, hit the abuse button so it can be gone.
67 posted on 06/01/2002 12:08:50 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I used to be Presbyterian (USA). But, of course, since that is a "mainline"...liberal...denomination, I never heard the word predestination the entire time I was there. I became a Calvinist from, well, hearing about it online and examining the Scriptures.....still clinging to a few of my pet free will verses for about a year and a half I think before finally giving in.
68 posted on 06/01/2002 12:13:59 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Hank Kerchief
Do you like it better than beer?

I know, I know - theres better tasting goat p*ss - I honestly havent had one in about 12 years - a holdover from my wilder days when carling black label and and utica club ruled the roost ;-d - bout all I see now days is cooking wine

70 posted on 06/01/2002 4:19:11 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins
name all the alternative interpretations you can come up with for this passage.<Right, Wrong and Indifferent.
71 posted on 06/01/2002 4:40:59 AM PDT by vmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Romans 16:17

I will not return to this thread.

72 posted on 06/01/2002 5:13:31 AM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
...before finally giving in

That is what it's like, isn't it?

We fight the absoluteness of God's will until the truth of it finally over-powers our prideful nature. "Irresistible."

I wish that comfort for everyone.

73 posted on 06/01/2002 6:35:15 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Ohhhhhh nooooooooooo outed again...that seems to be happening all the time :>)
74 posted on 06/01/2002 6:45:02 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: vmatt
name all the alternative interpretations you can come up with for this passage.

Nothing like a solid response.

75 posted on 06/01/2002 7:28:51 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Yep, put me down for that as well.

First time I read a presentation of "five-point" Calvinism (in, as I recall, The Forgotten Spurgeon), I was horrified. It struck me as heresy.

But as I cooled down later, and applied sola scriptura, I found block by block that Calvinism allowed verses that had mae me uncomfortable to mean exactly what they said.

Dan

76 posted on 06/01/2002 8:36:35 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
lol....there were some other posts I COULD have posted....man, everybody on that one thread was just REALLY furious at eachother. But, I chose one of the less angry posts..lol.
77 posted on 06/01/2002 3:09:03 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
They make me smile now:>)
78 posted on 06/01/2002 3:16:50 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: allend
Well, almost all the arguments against Calvinism is just that if we want to toss out allegations etc.
80 posted on 06/01/2002 8:31:58 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson