Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $29,479
36%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 36%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: appointments

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • FAX SENT TO THE 7 RINOS WHO CAVED IN TO THE MCCAINS

    05/24/2005 7:32:35 PM PDT · by joeclarke · 10 replies · 950+ views
    JoeClarke.Net ^ | 05/24/2005 | Joe Clarke
    FAX SENT TO SEVEN RINOS FAX SENT TO THE SEVEN RINOS WHO CAVED IN TO THE MCCAINSThe seven Republicans are John McCain (Arizona), John Warner (Virginia), Mike DeWine (Ohio), Lindsay Graham (South Carolina), Susan Collins (Maine), Olympia Snowe (Maine) and Lincoln Chaffee (Rhode Island).DEAR SENATOR XYZ:WOULD YOU LIKE TO STOP LEGISLATING IN THE SENATE, AND JUST LEAVE ALL THE LAWMAKING TO THE COURTS? LIB JUDGES WOULD.WOULD YOU WANT YOUR DAUGHTER OR GRANDDAUGHTER TAKEN ACROSS STATE LINES IF SHE BECAME PREGNANT - WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION? LIB JUDGES DO. DO YOU WANT GAY MARRIAGE AND INSTRUCTION, LATE TERM ABORTION, AND PORNOGRAPHY...
  • A long Senate history of filibuster threats

    05/24/2005 3:43:14 AM PDT · by Racehorse · 9 replies · 492+ views
    Newsday.com ^ | 24 May 2005 | Tom Brune
    Some Democrats say they began the filibusters to force Bush to consult with them and to select nominees with more moderate views. Yet both conservative and liberal senators and activists say that the 10 successful filibusters waged by Democrats have not swayed Bush, and may even have stiffened his resolve, raising the question of whether Democrats overplayed their hand.[. . .]Replacing Rehnquist with a conservative would not change the balance of a court that has voted 5-4 on many hot-button issues. But replacing a moderate or liberal would tilt the court to the right.[. . .]The fight over rules for...
  • Are YOU a Right-Wing Radical?

    05/23/2005 8:05:47 AM PDT · by MikeEdwards · 1 replies · 180+ views
    CFP ^ | May 23, 2005 | J.B. Williams
    According to senate minority leader Harry Reid and his friends, democrats must block the constitutional appointment process in order to protect you from right-wing radical judges. They say they use the filibuster only in the most extreme situations, to block confirmation of extremely dangerous radicals to the bench for sake of all mankind. Hero’s they are really, at least in their own minds… I can almost see their point too. Who would want some extreme right-wing wacko deciding justice in America? I mean, what if judges actually just stuck to the written law or constitution and applied them to cases...
  • Harry Reid: The Goblet Of Dire and Return of the Myth - (way over the top and beyond the pale!)

    05/21/2005 2:22:53 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 39 replies · 1,177+ views
    MENS NEWS DAILY.COM ^ | MAY 21, 2005 | SHER ZIEVE
    Instead of a magic wand, Harry Reid uses his mouth. And in place of fighting on the side of good, Harry readily and passionately embraces the dark forces. As Senate Minority leader, Reid has already taken the Democrat art of obstructionism far beyond that of his predecessor Tom Daschle. And in a manner similar to the infamous and ongoing Howie Dean screams, no Republican is safe from his rantings and invented falsehoods. Harry’s once quick smile has turned into a leer and his demeanor has degraded to that of a permanently enraged and deranged man. Yikes! His apprentice training is...
  • Bill Clinton Left A Few Stinkers - Over 370 Fed Judges

    05/14/2005 2:20:41 PM PDT · by joeclarke · 367+ views
    JoeClarke.Net ^ | 05/14/2005 | JoeClarke
    Bill Clinton Left A Few Stinkers - Over 370 Fed Judges That aroma wafting across the United States that could make one very ill if inhaled is not some imaginary pollution invented by the EPA or lib college professors, it is the smell of bad law made by Clinton appointed judges. The idea of 'One Man, One Vote' has been replaced by 'One Judge, One Million Votes' as federal judges continue to strip the power of referendum voters away from the common folk. This week, the Nebraska federal judge Joseph Battalion, who has just negated the wishes of 70 per...
  • Senators look for compromise on filibustering of judicial nominations(GOP sellout??)

    05/10/2005 9:38:25 AM PDT · by marylandrepub1 · 19 replies · 723+ views
    Baltimore Sun/Los Angeles Times ^ | May 10,2005 | Maura Reynolds
    WASHINGTON - With a showdown looming over President Bush's federal court nominees, Democrats and Republicans discussed compromise offers and counteroffers yesterday - some in public, some in private - that many lawmakers hope might defuse a conflict over the use of filibusters. Two leading senators - a Democrat and a Republican - urged their colleagues from the chamber's floor to lower tensions over blocked confirmations by moving ahead on nominees that Democrats oppose but have pledged not to filibuster. A third senator, Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska, said he was working privately to round up six of his Democratic colleagues...
  • Mohler: Judicial filibusters show religious liberty is at stake-(Baptist report;"Justice Sunday")

    04/25/2005 4:30:27 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 1 replies · 517+ views
    BAPTIST PRESS NEWS.NET ^ | APRIL 25, 2005 | JEFF ROBINSON
    LOUISVILLE, Ky. (BP)--Believers must exercise their Christian citizenship beyond the ballot box to halt activist judges and secularist senators who are robbing Americans of their religious liberty, R. Albert Mohler Jr. told a nationwide audience April 24 during “Justice Sunday” at Highview Baptist Church in Louisville, Ky. Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, was one of several speakers at the event, which was designed to mobilize Christians to action against judicial filibusters, which Democrat senators have used to block 10 of President Bush’s appellate court nominees. In most of the cases, senators objected to the nominees' pro-life views. The...
  • The Constitutional Option: What's Really At Stake - (brand new David Limbaugh column)

    04/21/2005 9:12:58 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 7 replies · 509+ views
    DAVID LIMBAUGH.COM ^ | APRIL 21, 2005 | DAVID LIMBAUGH
    The best way to understand the brouhaha over the Republican plan to invoke the constitutional option to prohibit Senate filibusters to thwart judicial nominations is that Democrats are very poor losers, but Republicans are even poorer winners -- so far. The reason we're even talking about a so-called " nuclear option" is that Democrat leaders remain in denial about their consistent drubbing at the ballot box. They won't accept that the public has rejected their message. They are acting like the ornery little brother who hits his older brother, and when big brother merely threatens to hit back, he goes...
  • Lead The Way - Senate Republicans not understanding true stakes in coming judicial showdown.

    04/14/2005 10:56:44 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 13 replies · 566+ views
    WEEKLY STANDARD.COM ^ | APRIL 14, 2005 | HUGH HEWITT
    IN RECENT DAYS I interviewed Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, and Ralph Neas, executive director of People for the American Way. Together these two are the architects of the policy of unyielding obstruction by Democrats of George Bush's judicial nominees. It is difficult to overstate their influence on the Democratic caucus: They are widely considered to be the hands steering Democratic policy on judges. Both blew the usual rhetorical smoke about how well President Bush is doing with his judicial nominations--Bush has by far the lowest approval rate to the appeals court for modern times for a...
  • Democrats going nuclear to violate the Constitution

    04/08/2005 11:48:42 PM PDT · by FraudFactor.com · 11 replies · 939+ views
    email | Apr 7, 2005 | Harry Reid
    Email from Democrat Harry Reed follows. This appears to contain extreme hate speech and bigoted ad homonym attacks. Dear supporter, Today I stood in front of the Supreme Court and collected more than 1 million petitions from people all across America. Standing there, I heard your voices urging the Senate to reject any attempt to do away with the system of checks and balances our founding fathers created to protect the rights and voices of all Americans. I want to say thank you for standing up and lending your voice to this debate. Republicans want to go "nuclear" and turn...
  • CA: Governor taps broad swath of attorneys to trial bench

    02/16/2005 6:22:17 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 3 replies · 322+ views
    Bakersfield Californian ^ | 2/16/05 | AP - San Francisco
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tapped 11 attorneys with a variety of legal backgrounds and political affiliations Wednesday in a bid to fill dozens of trial court vacancies in Los Angeles, Sacramento, Fresno and San Bernardino counties. Tapped to the Los Angeles County bench are Eleanor Hunter, 43, a Democrat and Los Angeles County prosecutor of Los Angeles; Michael Lavanas, 55, a Democrat and Los Angeles county court commissioner of Pacific Palisades; Scott Millington, 44, a Republican and Los Angeles County prosecutor of Manhattan Beach; and Dorothy Reyes, 52, a Democrat and insurance defense practitioner of Pasadena. To...
  • STATE OF THE UNION -- 2005 [Live Thread]

    02/02/2005 3:43:44 PM PST · by Timeout · 4,591 replies · 146,613+ views
    2/2/05
    The pre-spin: Bush will spend about 1/2 the speech on foreign policy, 1/2 on domestic, with heavy emphasis on Social Security reform. It's said he will provide a detailed tutorial on the SS system and its problems with a few details on his personal accounts proposal. Laura's guests are said to be an Afghan voter and an Iraqi voter (too bad there's no Ukrainian wearing an orange hat!). Should we start a drinking game on how many times the pool camera swings to Hillary? Hmmm. Probably not...it would likely hamper out typing ability. Word on the blogs has it that...
  • Clinton Appointed Judges. Question. (vanity)

    01/27/2005 6:45:09 PM PST · by CCCnative · 5 replies · 285+ views
    Vanity | 01/26/2005 | Calorman
    My son is taking a US history course in college and the discussion came up of all the judges that Clinton appointed during his term. The instructor said the vacancies were caused by retirements. It seemed very convenient. My question is: was there some widespread motivation that moved a huge amount of federal judges to retire and Clinton to thereby appoint over 350 judges? Please give references to your answers.
  • Democrats Warn GOP on Using 'Nuclear Option'

    01/16/2005 1:46:52 PM PST · by inquest · 140 replies · 2,626+ views
    AP ^ | 1-16-05
    WASHINGTON — The Senate's Democratic leader said Sunday that Republicans "would rue the day" if they try to make it harder for Democrats to stall judicial nominees who could not get a vote last year. But Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he hoped a new "optimistic" climate would take hold now that Nevada Sen. Harry Reid is the top Democrat, succeeding the defeated Tom Daschle of South Dakota, whom the GOP labeled an obstructionist.
  • A GOP president will appoint first black chief justice, first black woman justice - (Jack Kelly!)

    01/10/2005 8:12:55 PM PST · by CHARLITE · 40 replies · 1,589+ views
    JEWISH WORLD REVIEW.COM ^ | JANUARY 10, 2005 | JACK KELLY
    Chief Justice William Rehnquist's health is so poor he likely soon will be called to the Great Appellate Bench in the Sky. On NBC's "Meet the Press" program last month, the new Senate Democratic leader, Sen. Harry Reid, said he could support the elevation of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia to chief justice, but not Thomas. Angela Onwuachi-Willig, a liberal Democrat and law professor who is black, said Reid's erroneous attack on Thomas appeared to be motivated by racism. "It is the black justice who cannot write opinions, articulate independent thoughts or perform his job well," she said, writing in the...
  • Of Advice And Consent - (Using the "Nuclear Option" to end the Senate filibusters!)

    01/06/2005 8:05:19 PM PST · by CHARLITE · 4 replies · 505+ views
    DALEY TIMES-POST.COM ^ | JANUARY 6, 2005 | EDWARD L. DALEY
    Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution relates that "He [The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law..." So what does all that mean exactly? Well, the first part means...
  • Bush set to name Zoellick as Deputy to Rice

    01/06/2005 7:06:43 AM PST · by flitton · 4 replies · 324+ views
    reuters ^ | 06/01/05 | unattributed
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick is expected to be named deputy to incoming Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice later this month, a Bush administration official said on Thursday. The official said an announcement was likely after Rice's confirmation hearing scheduled for Jan. 18. Zoellick had also been mentioned as a candidate to replace World Bank President James Wolfensohn who told the bank this week he planned to leave in June. As Deputy Secretary of State, Zoellick would replace Richard Armitage who resigned when Colin Powell announced he was quitting soon after President Bush's re-election in November. Zoellick...
  • Rehnquist Back at Supreme Court Part Time

    01/06/2005 12:16:13 AM PST · by alessandrofiaschi · 11 replies · 456+ views
    Yahoo.com news ^ | Wed Jan 5, 2005 | Gina Holland
    WASHINGTON - Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist is back at work part time at the Supreme Court, but there is no word that he is ready to return to the bench. Rehnquist missed about 25 court arguments in November and December while receiving chemotherapy and radiation for thyroid cancer. A Supreme Court spokeswoman said Wednesday that the 80-year-old chief justice returned to the building late last month. "He's been working from both the court and home," spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said. Few details have been released about Rehnquist's condition. The chemotherapy-radiation treatment is common for the aggressive and life-threatening type of...
  • WSJ: Chief Justice Thomas (and the Dem dilemma)

    12/31/2004 6:04:13 AM PST · by OESY · 18 replies · 1,271+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | December 31, 2004 | JAMES TARANTO
    If Chief Justice William Rehnquist retires next year, President Bush likely won't face a tough battle over his successor. So reports the New York Times, citing consultant Howard Wolfson and "other Democrats." The Times attributes this to the Democrats' desire to soften their image as pro-abortion zealots. The court has a 6-3 majority in favor of Roe v. Wade, and Chief Justice Rehnquist is among the dissenters. Why should the Democrats spend political capital merely to run up the score? Anyway, this is a battle the Democrats would almost certainly lose. With only 45 senators..., they would need the support...
  • Republicans Must Sieze the Opportunity to Govern - (I agree! We won. Let's ROLL!)

    12/29/2004 9:07:14 PM PST · by CHARLITE · 8 replies · 302+ views
    CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | DECEMBER 31, 2004 | CHRISTOPHER ADAMO
    Political operatives on both sides of the aisle are discussing the 2008 election as if it is only days away. But hardly a dismissal of the important issues facing President Bush in his second term, this talk of the next presidential race is representative of the pivotal changes in the political landscape that occurred last November. Unfortunately, the forces of “moderation” are still at work within the GOP, threatening to undermine the tremendous gains made by conservatives in the elections. Arnold Schwarzenegger contends that the Republican Party should move “to the center” (which means to the left) on social issues....