So, if the Obama administration can't "spread the wealth" enough through legislation and executive action, we can look forward to "spread the wealth" judicial activists carrying on in the federal courts for decades after we sweep the Obama administration aside?
This is why judicial appointments matter. We don't need judges who feel it's more important to "spread the wealth" than it is to follow the letter of the law and the U. S. Constitution.
If this man is elected, the country is in for a very long, very rough time. The damage will be much longer lasting, even if the voters figure out by his actions that they don't want his policies and vote the dems out of control at the 2010 elections. By then, we're screwed big time.
If there were any real newspapers left, I'd share your concerns.
Though this is somewhat troubling from a constitutional/free press/free speech standpoint.
It's also not clear what this grieving widow is seeking from the reporter and the Times. Even the site you linked to didn't have that information.
Typical liberal drivel, though. It's the traffic controller's fault. No responsibility for the pilots involved. I'm not sure I buy into that line of thought. I can't think of a collision where someone on one of the planes couldn't have done something to prevent it.
DaveArk wrote:I guess they dont want to spend time and money on reverse engineering. That was my first thought as well.
I also find this quote from the original article interesting:
The Chinese government said it needs the source code to prevent computer viruses taking advantage of software vulnerabilities and to shut out hackers. I've often found that people are most fearful of others doing to them things that they have done to others, or are willing to do to others. Makes you wonder if the Chinese have been planting viruses, back doors, or other malicious software in products made there.