Then why did you post the Section 301(g) excerpt at all?
By posting it, it is logical to assume, that you are using that as a justification for proof of citizenship.
Then, as soon as anybody points out the flaws to you, you duck and dive, and go in another direction - just like BHO - your story keeps on changing.
How about taking a specific stance and giving us the full monty of what you believe. No obfuscations. Think you can do that?