What do you think the odds are that 0 actually will be impeached? Given that he would be tried by the Dem-controlled Senate? Even if he does get impeached we will have President Biden to look forward to, and he is likely to follow the same policies as 0bummer.
Thanks for posting an article that lays out the exact charges 0bama would be impeached on. I confess I have not been following this issue as much as I would like, and I can think of so many ways in which 0bama has overstepped the Constitutional limits of his power that it’s hard to narrow it down to just 3.
0bama is an empty vessel tossed by the wind and current of popular opinion or rather what his advisers tell him is popular opinion. America needs and deserves a real leader, one who is not afraid to sacrifice short-term popularity over long-term benefits to this country and puts the interests of We the People above those of the political elite. Sadly I have yet to see such a leader from either party.
While Uganda’s law does strike me as overly involved in its citizens’ private lives if the libs really did care about the poorest among us they wouldn’t cut off aid to Uganda. Why should the poor of Uganda starve because their political leaders (who were probably not democratically elected) made a decision our Left disagrees with? If we only gave foreign aid to countries whose policies met with our 100% approval our foreign aid budget would be small enough to drown in a bathtub. The Left obviously has no problem giving aid to Muslim countries that prohibit women from getting an education and kill them for the “crime” of being raped.
Where have you been the last 50 years? Seems like every day is Divorce Pride Day in the USSA. When the Sexual Revolution started people who wanted to get divorced were “in your face” about it; the reason they aren’t demanding affirmation anymore is because they won that battle long ago. Try suggesting to a divorced person that no-fault divorce should be repealed and they probably will call you a bigot or a trogolydite.
If anything affirming divorce is far worse for the sanctity of marriage than affirming homosexuality because there are more divorced people than there are homosexuals. At the end of the day homosexuals are just a small, though vocal, minority.
I read somewhere (I believe it was the San Diego Union Tribune but it could have been an online source) that Faulconer is pro-abortion and pro-SSM. If true, then that could explain why liberals have accepted his election so easily.
You said it. I also am worried about the police apparently doing nothing to protect good people. The liberals think they can prevent vigilantism by confiscating guns. Those of us who have actually picked up a history book know that acts of vigilantism have also been committed by knives, rope, torches, pitchforks, tar, and feathers. Are the liberals planning to ban those too?
My point is that there is a plethora of policy-based arguments against 0bummer without getting sidetracked with discussions of his sexual orientation. Forcing young people to buy health insurance at above-market prices? That affects me and many other people my age. TSA scanners at the airport? That affects me and every American that flies. 0’s sexual orientation? Not so much, since I have no plans to replace Moochelle as his wife/beard.
I don’t have kids but if I did I wouldn’t stop loving them if one of them did turn out to be a homosexual. I might speak to them about it but parental love is unconditional. Getting emotional won’t change a child’s sexual orientation and may even make homosexuality seem more appealing, the forbidden fruit (no pun intended) is always sweeter, etc. As for my husband, I am single but if I were to marry a gay man it would depend on how far he went with it. If he had unprotected sex with a bunch of guys every night, I wouldn’t want to sleep with him for fear of getting AIDS. But if he was just attracted to other men without acting on it, it wouldn’t be an issue any more than if he were attracted to a hot female coworker but remained loyal to me.
I want to live in a society where people live and let live as long as others don’t flaunt their vices in public (e.g. potheads pressuring me into trying weed). Perhaps you and I have different definitions of what constitutes “in your face” homosexuality but if 0 is gay he’s making more of an effort to hide it than most dems would. Just take a look at the Castro district or West Hollywood and you will see what I mean.
I believe in right and wrong, but I don’t see homosexuality as the worst liberal-supported sin. That would be abortion. I also don’t see how 1% of the population can possibly hurt the traditional family as much as the 51% divorce rate or the increase in heterosexual promiscuity, both of which many Freepers remain absolutely mum about.
I believe in God, which is why I have faith that he will give our bozo-in-chief exactly what he deserves in due time.
-Reneging on his 2008 campaign promise to repeal the unconstitutional Patriot Act
-NSA surveillance of American citizens
-His statement that he didn’t need Congressional approval to start bombing Syria