Free Republic

“Don’t get on the trains. It’s a trap!”

That was my thought when I read the headline.

The U.S. Supreme Court has written: “Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other.” Luria v, U.S., 231 U.S. 9, 22. (1913)

No duty to protect means there is no corresponding obligation of allegience. No allegiance to their million+ laws, statutes and regulations.

A State is a body politic — political society. A body politic is the citizens.

Connect the dots:
There is no duty to protect > there is no obligation of allegiance > there are no citizens > there is no body politic — no political society > there is no State.

Factually what is a State? What is the State of Arizona? The State of Arizona is an act of congress — words on paper. A legal fiction. Prior to February 14, 1912, the State of Arizona didn’t exist.

What is government? Men and women providing services by compulsion/violence.

Politicians don’t represent people. Pay the tax or go to jail isn’t representation. It’s ownership, or at least enslavement.

Connect the dots:

The U.S. Supreme Court has written: “Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other.” Luria v, U.S., 231 U.S. 9, 22. (1913)

As an aside to the above, every dictionary I’ve seen has a definition of citizen: a duty of allegiance in return for a duty to protect.

The State is the body politic. A body politic is the citizens.

Connect the dots:
There is no duty to protect > there is no obligation of negligence > there are no citizens > there is no body politic > there is no State.

Factually what is a State? What is the State of Arizona? The State of Arizona is an act of congress — words on paper. A legal fiction. Prior to February 14, 1912, the State of Arizona didn’t exist.

What is government? Men and women providing services by compulsion/violence.

Politicians don’t represent people. Pay the tax or go to jail isn’t representation. It’s ownership, or at least enslavement.

"That's right, keep it classy. Show everyone we're not really lowlife fanatics like DU."

Way too late. I use to be an everyday reader/poster on FreeRepublic since 1998 to 2006. I occasionally return to see how things have progressed -- for better or worse.

so let's explore the Kennedy's life history under daddy joe warbucks..or let's explore the history of many other prominent American names - not just a few of which made their fortunes in drug smuggling or booze running..

And Prescott Bush's laundering money for the Nazis. It's a fact, as is Joe Kennedy's bootlegging. Facts are facts and is separate issue from whether they are reported. People in denial of facts of reality do so to their own detriment.

I've been off of FreeRepublic as a regular reader and poster almost two years. I came here today to research an issue seemingly unrelated to this thread. My research and that of several others found a few very effective ways to stop a legal proceeding that is a charge against a person for having committed a victimless crime.

If a charge against a person is not founded on an injury to a man, woman or child -- commonly called a victimless crime -- then there's no corpus delicti (body of the crime) for a valid cause of action. Ratification of commencement demands that the prosecutor brings to court an injured man, woman or child and that the injury was allegedly due to an act by the defendant. This would typically be an affidavit of a sworn complaint signed by the injured living person under an oath of perjury. That is the body of the crime.

Do a Google search on "ratification of commencement" and "corpus delicti" and you'll find dozens of court cases that were dismissed because they lacked both of those. You'll also find the requirement for corpus delicti in most State constitutions. To learn more about corpus delicti google Adventures in Legal Land or go to marcstevens.net . Also, while there watch the video Delusions. For ratification of commencement see statusisfreedom.com -- right sidebar. 

Think of how many victimless crimes are being prosecuted: traffic tickets, IRS charges, illicit drug charges, driving an unregistered motor vehicle, driving without a license, and the list goes on.

People are using the fact that there's no injured party (man, woman or child or their property) that has cause to state a claim to get charges dismissed.

These aren't flukes or loopholes. They're people waking up to reality. 

Here's another thing. With most charges the plaintiff is the State. Yet the State cannot testify that it has been injured because the State has no energy. The State is a legal fiction. If a judge says the prosecutor represents the State of ________... Response, "Then I demand the prosecutor produce the document that the State of Texas signed granting the prosecutor power of attorney for the State of Texas." The State can't sign a document anymore than a car, fork or hat can.

Also, know that all lawyers are an officer of the court and their first obligation is to the court. Second in priority is to the bar association and last in line is the defendant. I'll never hire a lawyer to defend me.

Reality check: Government is men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. If those services were so valuable people would freely avail themselves of them.

What happened?

Vote fraud.

Legislature, split the difference. Do you have any comment about what you saw?

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/39986/

The Freedom to Fascism video does a good job of exposing the matrix of government fraud.

That had a lot of good information about the current system, as well as a persuasive argument for his preferred solution. The problem is that that recording was made 10 years ago (about the time the FairTax was in development) and I see no public support or even awareness of it.

The presentation was accurate yet unrealistic in the frame it was presented in. It failed to acknowledge the steps required that a revenue neutral tax plan be implemented before reducing the size and spending of government. This is my understanding that the FairTax gains control of the taxpayers' part in funding the government and once implemented then tighten the reigns on government dereliction of duty.

Now, that is one frame of reference but it is not the best nor widest scope or big picture.

I've been immersed in research for four weeks to get at the roots. To discover the nuts and bolts of the legal and lawful aspects of government operations -- statutory/admiralty/maritime law and jurisdiction. 

I've had to re-question and revisit and further research in light of newly acquired information the foundations on which governments -- local, county, state and federal -- operate and the people's relationship to government under each government's jurisdiction. 

Also universities, mainstream media, money, currency the banking system, the federal reserve and multi-national corporations. The methods, strategies, tactics and concepts used to deceive and defraud virtually ever living person. Not just in the united States of America but also virtually ever living person in all other countries.

Very little of the information is speculation. More than ninety percent is documented fact. Many bits and pieces have been discussed on FR. Whereas I've seen no mention whatsoever of other areas. Two key pieces of the puzzle have no presence on this forum. Least wise none that I've seen.

Many people on these threads know me from theses threads. To that I inform you that what I've discovered, as have many people before me uncovered many pieces of the big picture puzzle is that beyond their accurate analogies to the movie The Matrix as a metaphor, little has been mentioned about where this all goes when Neo, in the last scene says just prior to hanging up the telephone, "Where it goes from here is up to you..." 

The picture of where this is intended to go and how to proceed is being filled in. It's the half of the big picture where all future progress and prosperity will flourish.

In the other half of the picture is at least six, but probably not more than ten, large puzzle pieces that accurately describe that half of the picture that is to be separated or cleaved from the big picture. This describes the matrix. It is in that half of the picture that the controllers and handlers -- parasitical elites -- where many or most dissatisfied people wind up fighting the prevailing current -- swimming upstream, so to speak -- without having accurately identified what they're up against--the nuts and bolts and in most cases the foundation.

The FairTax grass roots movement is one piece of the puzzle. Because it's a headline, attention grabber that the people in general can sink their teeth into. It leads people to question other areas that they otherwise would not be inclined to look into or research.

Side note. Carrying on the legacy of my tagline, after nine years of posting to FR, for the first time I've posted something at my profile page.

Listen to this audio presentation of the Perfect Tax and in it, among many important facts you will discover the insidious agenda of the squirrels for posting to the FairTax threads. 

Good one. Who was it that said that or where did I read it? Is that a fairly common phrase?

Since when was the idea that the trees would grow faster? The idea was just to plant more of them.

It's in the first two paragraphs. Couldn't miss it. I scanned the rest to see if there would be any mention of that critical fact. That's besides the most important fact, as you mentioned: there's not an anthropic global warming problem. 

Jeff White stepped forward to become surety for the JEFF WHITE corporate fiction. JEFF WHITE was being addressed by the court -- not Jeff White. 

Big mistake that virtually everyone makes.

A court order or police acting for they court must identify the JEFF WHITE fiction before any summons, traffic ticket or court order can be served/attached to it. Since fictions are not living beings they cannot speak or move 

Jeff White never signed a contract that obligated him to perform as surety for the JEFF WHITE corporate fiction.

Within five days after Jeff White's birth the registrar at the hospital sent the birth certificate to the State Registrar. The State Registrar recorded the birth certificate and the JEFF WHITE corporate fiction was created and bond attached. The liability bond is similar to the commercial liability bond a Sheriff stands on when performing his official duties. Except...

Except for one very important difference. The Sheriff took an oath and entered into contract  knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Jeff White didn't. Jeff was held by adhesion to the contract that he was ignorant of. It was his coming forward that his spoken name Jeff White was intentionally misconstrued to be JEFF WHITE the corporate fiction.

In common law Jeff is his chosen/given name and White is his family name. In Statutory law JEFF is the first name and WHITE is the last name.

Notice that in courtrooms and police stations and many other public buildings the US flag has a gold fringe on three sides. That identifies it as under the admiralty/maritime jurisdiction. Because that jurisdiction concerns international law congress wrote the codes into the UNITED STATES corporate laws. For the most part it's all about contract, liability and remedy in that jurisdiction. It was a blending of equity law and admiral/maritime law and they call it Statutory Law and Statutory Jurisdiction.

In a just society, this girl would OWN the Sheriff’s department.

From the article it certainly appears that she has been dishonored. The Sheriffs are bonded and so are their Persons. She could lawfully issue them a bill for whatever she figures her hours spent in their custody is worth. 

Unfortunately she doesn't understand the statues and how to use them and no attorney would act in that capacity for her. If an attorney was to act as her agent he would most likely be disbarred for doing what she can lawfully do.

Ask them?

Insanity! 

It's pure insanity I tell ya.

It seems everyone is running out to buy killer guns. Blood will run deep in the streets.

Insanity check: does this post require an off-sarcasm tag?

Don’t underestimate creationists ability to grasp the tiniest bit of unsubstantiated evidence as proof that evolutionary theory is wrong.

Like throwing spaghetti against the wall to see if it sticks. It almost never does, but they keep trying. What does stick, after further scrutiny it usually ends up supporting evolution.

If MJ were legal, would you want it sold to your junior high aged children?

You mean like it is now with marijuana prohibition, marijuana controlled by violent gangs and organized crime as opposed to government regulated like alcohol? I haven't seen beer distributors gunning it out for turf since the days of alcohol prohibition. Same goes for quality control. Back then it wasn't uncommon for people to die from drinking bootleg booze. Kids too. Marijuana has caused zero death.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP).