Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,331
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: overturn

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Democracy Without Politics - The Left seeks to overturn the 2024 election even before it happens.

    01/19/2024 7:06:58 AM PST · by MtnClimber · 6 replies
    American Mind ^ | 18 Jan, 2024 | Carson Holloway
    As the 2024 election campaign begins in earnest, the Democratic Party has apparently decided that its central electoral pitch will be that American democracy itself is at stake in this year’s national elections. This was the central theme of President Biden’s first major campaign speech of the year, dutifully echoed by lower-ranking Democrats and the Party’s megaphones in the media and among the left intelligentsia. Unable to run on a record of competent custodianship of the seemingly less lofty policy issues that concern many voters—like the economy, foreign policy, and immigration—Biden and the Democrats must present themselves as the only...
  • Tonight: Jan. 6 Panel To Accuse Trump Of ‘Coordinated, Multi-Step Effort’ To Overturn Election

    06/09/2022 10:24:41 AM PDT · by blam · 102 replies
    Zubu Brothers ^ | 6-9-2022
    The Jan. 6 panel will use never-before-seen documentation and closed-door depositions on Thursday to present their grand unifying theory to connect former President Trump to the Capitol riot, as part of a broader effort to keep him in power. Tonight’s televised 90-minute hearing, which begins at 8pm ET and is being produced by a former network television executive, will show that the Jan. 6 2021 attack on the Capitol was the result of a coordinated, multi-step effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election and stop the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden,” a House Select...
  • Flip-Floppin’ Joe Biden Once Voted to Overturn Roe v. Wade

    05/04/2022 4:21:48 PM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 14 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 05/04/2022 | Wendell Husebo
    President Joe Biden opposed the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize abortion one year after Roe v Wade. “I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body,” he told the Washingtonian in 1974, one year after the court legalized abortion.
  • Draft Roe v. Wade ruling sends panic through LGBTQ community: ‘They’re coming for us next’

    05/03/2022 5:39:36 PM PDT · by libh8er · 85 replies
    SF Chronicle ^ | 5.3.2022 | Dustin Gardiner
    SACRAMENTO — If the “right to privacy” that courts have ruled is provided by the U.S. Constitution were a home, Roe v. Wade would be the foundation and subsequent rulings enshrining LGBTQ rights would be akin to the floors built above. LGBTQ activists and legal scholars say that’s why the revelation that the Supreme Court is set to overturn Roe v. Wade, the historic case protecting abortion rights, sent a wave of panic through the community as many question whether rulings protecting same-sex marriage and consensual sexual acts could be targeted next. “If the foundation of a house crumbles, the...
  • Breaking: A leaked draft decision indicates that the Supreme Court will overturn the Roe v. Wade abortion decision

    05/02/2022 7:03:14 PM PDT · by Wish2Post · 86 replies
    Blaze Media ^ | May 2, 2022 | Carlos Garcia
    A draft decision indicates that the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn the controversial Roe v. Wade decision that established abortion rights in 1973. The initial draft majority opinion was obtained by Politico and published on Monday. (SEE: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473) The draft is written by Justice Samuel Alito and was reportedly circulated inside the court. “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes, referring to a separate decision that defended abortion rights. The leak of a draft opinion is unprecedented in the modern history of the Supreme Court. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning...
  • New book says Trump allies pushed DoD to overturn election

    11/16/2021 8:56:29 AM PST · by ChicagoConservative27 · 28 replies
    The Hill ^ | 11/16/2021 | Jordan Williams
    A newly released book claims that allies of former President Trump tried to push a top Defense Department official into overturning the 2020 election. According to the book "Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show,” which was published Tuesday, former national security advisor Michael Flynn and attorney Sidney Powell both made calls to Ezra Cohen, who was then acting as Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, while Cohen was traveling in the Middle East, ABC News reported. Flynn and Powell were among Trump’s most vocal allies as the former president sought to overturn the 2020 election based...
  • Nobody’s trying to ‘overturn’ the election. We’re CORRECTING fraudulent results.

    12/11/2020 6:54:54 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 7 replies
    NOQ Report ^ | 12/11/2020 | Carl Durrek
    The memo came down from the prince of darkness that everyone in media, Big Tech, and the Democratic Party are supposed to frame challenges to election results as attempts to “overturn” the election. This is ludicrous and disingenuous, especially when we consider the likelihood that this election was plagued by rampant voter fraud on a massive scale. There’s a reason they’re using that word. “Overturned” is, in its very nature, a violent and often unwanted action. A car can get “overturned” in an accident. But it’s also an important word because it insinuates the election results are already determined and...
  • Sidney Powell to Newsmax TV: Plenty of Time for Trump to Overturn Election Results (VIDEO)

    12/04/2020 7:00:07 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 51 replies
    NewsMax ^ | 12/04/2020 | Solange Reyner
    Attorney Sidney Powell says there’s plenty of time for President Donald Trump’s legal team to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. “With the fraud case, the Dec. 8 deadline doesn’t apply,” Powell said Friday during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s “Stinchfield” in reference to the “safe harbor” deadline that frees a state from further challenge if it resolves all disputes and certifies its voting results. “We have at least until Dec. 14,” she said. “We might file more suits. The court in Michigan or Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that. These are not pure...
  • The Courts Will Likely Overturn the Election Results In Numerous Jurisdictions Due to Voter Fraud – In the Data Is Where the Amount of Election Fraud Can Be Quantified and Estimated

    11/17/2020 7:25:27 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 79 replies
    Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/17/2020 | Joe Hoft
    Voter fraud occurred across the board in the 2020 election and in every functional area. But in the data is where we’re able to locate and quantify or estimate much of the amount of election fraud which occurred in the 2020 election.The 2020 election steal occurred in all areas. Before the election votes were mass-mailed and many of these votes we now are finding were illegitimate (i.e. dead people voting, etc…). Many other illegitimate votes came in after the election as those involved in the theft hurried to get enough votes counted to steal the election. Then the vote counting...
  • Lawyers for Hillary Clinton Ask Appeals Court to Overturn Order for Her Deposition

    03/15/2020 9:43:03 AM PDT · by Enlightened1 · 21 replies
    Judicial Watch ^ | 03/13/20
    udicial Watch announced today that lawyers for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills have asked the Court of Appeals to overturn a U.S. District court order granting Judicial Watch’s request for their depositions about Clinton’s emails and Benghazi attack records. Lawyers for Clinton and Mills filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” earlier today.The Clinton request comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for...
  • Schumer: Democrats will try to overturn tax deduction cap

    10/24/2019 6:36:45 AM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 26 replies
    abcnews.go ^ | 10/22/2019 | Michael Balsamo
    Senate Democrats are attempting to repeal an IRS regulation that is designed to keep people from exceeding the $10,000 limit on state and local tax deductions. Democrats will force a vote, scheduled for Wednesday, to overturn the regulation through the Congressional Review Act, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told The Associated Press on Tuesday.
  • Insiders Attempt To Overturn The Election With Attack On Flynn

    02/14/2017 5:09:57 AM PST · by Enlightened1 · 97 replies
    American Greatness ^ | 02/13/17 | Chris Buskirk
    National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is in the hot seat. But the real target is President Trump and his foreign policy. Donald Trump was elected as a change agent by Americans unhappy with the trajectory of the country and with the cozy concord that exists between political adversaries in a Washington where the politicians find more in common with each other than with the American people. Donald Trump ran on a foreign policy platform that explicitly repudiated the disastrous bipartisan consensus of moral imperialism and international “busybodyism” that has prevailed for the last quarter century and that has cost the...
  • Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19 - FREEP CALL UP !

    11/12/2016 2:48:11 PM PST · by LeoWindhorse · 43 replies
    Change .org ^ | Nov 10, 2016 | elijah berg
    On December 19, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots. If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, they can vote for Hillary Clinton if they choose. Even in states where that is not allowed, their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine - which we can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay! We are calling on the Electors to ignore their states' votes and cast their ballots for Secretary Clinton. Why?
  • Supreme Court shocks life into Obamacare challenge

    10/06/2012 8:53:22 AM PDT · by jimluke01 · 17 replies
    WND ^ | Matt Barber
    The emperor wears no clothes. The bloom is off the rose. The bigger they are, the harder they fall. Pardon the barrage of stale metaphors, but it’s difficult to put into words the utter pasting Mitt Romney put on Barack Obama Wednesday night. Pat Buchanan called Romney’s “the finest debate performance” in 52 years “with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan’s demolition of Jimmy Carter in 1980.” Indeed, when all of CNN and MSNBC – to include Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’Donnell and Rachel Maddow – hysterically admit that President Obama got smoked; he got smoked. Bad. Liberal blogger and Obama...
  • Did Obamacare Ruling Overturn Roe v. Wade?

    08/25/2012 7:17:41 PM PDT · by kathsua · 11 replies
    Reason's Thought, a blog of Townhall ^ | August 23, 2012 | reasonmclucus
    Those arguing over the constitutionality of Obamacare have consistently ignored the fact that Obamacare conflicts with the Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade. The Court's decision to uphold Obamacare may provide statements that could be used to justify regulating and possibly even prohibiting abortion. The Court wouldn't need to refer to Roe v. Wade to in effect overturn it. The justices could inadvertently overturn Roe v. Wade by making statements that conflict with it. Attorneys could use such conflicts to argue that Roe v. Wade is no longer consistent with the Court's interpretation of the Constitution. I'm going to...
  • Obama's top attorney tells the court, "Nevermind."

    04/05/2012 1:53:47 PM PDT · by landsbaum · 44 replies
    When our president, a, ahem, constitutional scholar, berated the court for having the audacity to consider overturning an unconstitutional law, he implied justices should think twice before doing such an unprecedented thing. Of course, Barack Obama was revealing himself to be anything but a constitutional scholar. A mere appellate court judge got so miffed he ordered the Obama Administration to submit a three-page, single-spaced paper today explaining how judicial review is something the court has the authority to do. So, Eric Holder, who currently holds the position of Attorney General in the admnistration, submitted the letter. Here’s what Holder had...
  • Judicial tyranny cannot exist absent a compliant Congress

    08/30/2009 7:22:12 AM PDT · by brucek43 · 5 replies · 419+ views
    http://www.collinsreport.net ^ | Aug 30, 2009 | bruce karlson
    Judicial tyranny cannot exist absent a compliant Congress. Bruce Karlson Judicial tyranny began with an obscure case in 1803. A supine Congress accepted the Court’s ruling in Marbury v. Madison in 1803 which nullified a law in making its ruling. Congressional acquiescence allowed the genie of judicial rule by decree to be released. To better understand the significance of this ruling, we should examine the thoughts of the Founders. The issue of judicial poaching was of concern, and is addressed in the Constitution’s Article III, Section 2, “In all other cases before mentioned the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction...
  • Barack Obama's Pledge to Overturn Every Pro-Life Abortion Law One Year Old

    07/23/2008 3:59:25 PM PDT · by julieee · 19 replies · 478+ views
    LifeNews.com ^ | July 23, 2008 | Steven Ertelt
    Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One year ago this week, Barack Obama promised activists with the nation's largest abortion business that the first thing he would do as president is overturn every pro-life law in all 50 states. He said his first action would be signing the mislabeled Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). The measure, if it becomes law, would codify Roe v. Wade by making the infamous Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited abortions the law of the land. But it would go further and overturn hundreds of state laws that have put limits on abortion like parental involvement, partial-birth abortion...
  • NRA sues to overturn San Francisco gun ban in city housing

    06/27/2008 9:17:26 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 51 replies · 169+ views
    Mercury News ^ | 6/27/08 | Howard Mintz
    <p>The National Rifle Association today filed a lawsuit challenging San Francisco's ban on handguns in public housing, trying to capitalize on the U.S. Supreme Court's historic ruling finding a constitutional right to own guns for self-defense in the home.</p> <p>In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, lawyers for gun rights advocates are asking a federal judge to invalidate San Francisco's handgun law based on the Supreme Court's decision striking down a broader Washington, D.C. law forbidding residents to own handguns.</p>
  • Will Californians submit?

    05/17/2008 4:32:34 AM PDT · by kindred · 36 replies · 85+ views
    Onenewsnow.com ^ | 5/16/2008 | Jan LaRue
    I was a Californian for 40 years, so I have to ask my former fellow citizens: Are you going to sit by and do nothing while four black-robed despots take away your right to govern yourselves? By one vote, the California Supreme Court on Thursday rejected the expressed will of Californians to limit marriage to a man and a woman. In 2000, a 61.4 percent majority of Californians passed Proposition 22, which limited marriage to a man and a woman and precluded California's recognition of same-sex "marriages" consummated elsewhere. In a decision derided by a dissenting California justice as "legal...