Posted on 07/15/2009 5:01:45 PM PDT by decimon
The mystery of the landlocked salmon in the fossil record from the Interior of British Columbia has been a topic of hot debate for a number of years. Salmon have permeated First Nations mythology and have been prized as an important food source for thousands of years. In the Interior of British Columbia, archaeological evidence dates the use of salmon as a food source back 3,500 years. Sheri Burton and Catherine Carlson were able to isolate and amplify mitochondrial DNA from salmon remains from archaeological sites near Kamloops, and identified the species as Oncorhynchus nerka, or Sockeye salmon.
No older salmon remains had been found in the Kamloops area until the 1970s, when fossil salmon concretions were collected on the south shore of Kamloops Lake. These concretions were originally dated as Miocene (24 5.5 million years old) by the Geological Survey of Canada, based on analysis of pollen grains found in the concretions. However, many local experts, including UBC geology professor W.R. Danner and the late geologists W.H. Mathews and Richard Hughes, suspected the remains were from the much more recent, Late Pleistocene epoch.
But it was not until the early 1990s that Catherine Carlson and Ken Klein found definitive proof of this. By good luck, the fish remains in the Kamloops Lake concretions had not been completely replaced by minerals enough of the original organic bone collagen remained for radiocarbon dating. The corrected date is approximately 18,000 years.
(Excerpt) Read more at scientificblogging.com ...
Ice fishing ping.
Guess I’m not understanding the importance of this. Are they unsure of how the sockeye got there or what?
We catch salmon here in Michigan that aren’t traditionally landlocked species.
I bet salmon tasted good before that too.
The salmon in Michigan were stocked there by people in recent times. The landlocked sockeyes (called kokanee) in the Pacific NW weren’t.
That in the last ice age, the glaciers receded sooner than has been thought in some areas. That people habituated those areas sooner than has been thought. Or so it seems from this finding.
The author concentrated on the salmon but the other stuff caught my eye. And the picture. I like the picture.
Pollen grains, 24-5.5 million years, carbon dating, 18,000 years? Well, that inspires confidence in the dating methods of the learned men.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks decimon. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
A salmon of doubt?
Simple.
They were inhabiting the rivers and lakes before the peak of the last ice age.
Begs to question whether salmon were originally fresh water creatures or have always been salt to fresh migrational.
Good question. Life is in the sea. Birth and death in the stream.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.