Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth's two moons? It's not lunacy, but new theory
Associated Press ^ | August 3, 2011 | SETH BORENSTEIN

Posted on 08/03/2011 12:49:20 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a spectacle that might have beguiled poets, lovers and songwriters if only they had been around to see it, Earth once had two moons, astronomers now think. But the smaller one smashed into the other in what is being called the "big splat."

The result: Our planet was left with a single bulked-up and ever-so-slightly lopsided moon.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; moon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2011 12:49:21 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Many theories can be gleaned by taking acid with a word processor handy..

If the third human on earth didn’t come from two other ones then a bodacious Yarn MUST be constructed.. to explain it..


2 posted on 08/03/2011 12:55:40 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

James P. Hogan wrote an interesting series of sci-fi books based upon the aggregation on the farside due to the death of the planet Minerva that formed the asteroid belt.


3 posted on 08/03/2011 12:56:09 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Another theory and just as valid (my own) is that there were two really big pieces of rye bread and mustard spread with a three or so slices of honey ham on them when those big chunks of cheese (called the moon) collided.
4 posted on 08/03/2011 12:56:09 PM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Wrong. The big splat hit D.C. resulting in so many moonbats there.


5 posted on 08/03/2011 12:56:21 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Standing, waiting for the first Kim Kardashian pics.


6 posted on 08/03/2011 12:57:18 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; KevinDavis; SunkenCiv

interesting theory, let me guess they want a government grant to study it?


7 posted on 08/03/2011 12:57:31 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Plausible but pointless.


8 posted on 08/03/2011 1:01:55 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: freejohn

She really seems to have her hands full. (see what I did there?)


10 posted on 08/03/2011 1:10:50 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Photobucket Photobucket
11 posted on 08/03/2011 1:18:35 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
8-)

12 posted on 08/03/2011 1:20:03 PM PDT by freejohn ("Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." --- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The result: Our planet was left with a single bulked-up and ever-so-slightly lopsided moon.

The moon would be (and is) slightly lopsided anyway because of tidal forces due to Earth's gravitational pull. That is why the moon's rotation is locked to its orbit so that the same side always faces the Earth.

13 posted on 08/03/2011 1:32:05 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
That pic of Brown calls to mind Bill Fagerbakke in The Stand. M-O-O-N, that spells feeble-minded!
14 posted on 08/03/2011 1:36:32 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Earth once had two moons, astronomers now think. But the smaller one smashed into the other in what is being called the "big splat."
Thanks GeronL.


15 posted on 08/03/2011 3:41:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Indeed. And I’ve always thought the far side of the moon had more craters because that side takes more hits from meteors.


16 posted on 08/03/2011 3:44:14 PM PDT by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

No.

I assure you that Quix’s

nightmares

were NOT the origin of this theory.


17 posted on 08/03/2011 6:32:49 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Awaiting Al Gore to announce that if we do not reduce Global Warming, the Earth will once more give birth to a second moon to remove the ill gained heat from Mother Earth.


18 posted on 08/03/2011 8:20:59 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Given the size of Al Gore’s ego/head . . .

he could create another moon all on his own, I suspect.

/sar


19 posted on 08/03/2011 9:32:02 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Early Earth may have had two moons, Richard Lovett · Nature · 3 August 2011 · Both satellites would have formed from debris that was ejected when a Mars-size protoplanet smacked into Earth late in its formation period. Whereas traditional theory states that the infant Moon rapidly swept up any rivals or gravitationally ejected them into interstellar space, the new theory suggests that one body survived, parked in a gravitationally stable point in the Earth-Moon system. Several such 'Lagrangian' points exist, but the two most stable are in the Moon's orbit, 60° in front or 60° behind... The Moon's visible side is dominated by low-lying lava plains, whereas its farside is composed of highlands...The crust on the farside is 50 kilometres thicker... The nearside is also richer in potassium (K), rare-earth elements (REE) and phosphorus (P)... An impact, he believes, is the most likely explanation.

A previous collision with a smaller companion could explain why the Moons two sides look so different.Martin Jutzi and Erik Asphaug

20 posted on 08/03/2011 10:13:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson