Posted on 09/15/2015 2:59:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)
New perspectives for long-term climate predictions?
Are climate predictions over periods of several years reliable if weather forecast are still only possible for short periods of several days? Nevertheless there are options to predict the development of key parameters on such long time scales. A new study led by scientists at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel shows how the well-known 11-year cycle of solar activity affects the long-time development of dominant large-scale pressure systems in the Northern Hemisphere.
For their investigations the scientists used a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. In addition, this model includes an interactive chemistry module which can for instance cope with the effect of ultraviolet radiation (UV) in the upper atmosphere. This additional component seemed to be key to transmit the variations in the solar radiation which might have only a small direct impact on the earths surface, through a complex mechanism from the stratosphere (10-50 km altitude) to the lower atmosphere.
We have carried out several experiments, says Dr. Rémi Thiéblemont from GEOMAR, lead author of the study. We conducted model experiments over a period of 145 years, with and without the influence of solar activity , Thiéblemont continued. The suns influence could clearly be identified in the so-called North Atlantic Oscillation, which is roughly speaking the pressure difference between the Azores high and the Iceland low. The ratio between these two pressure systems often determines the weather in Europe over longer time periods, such as whether the winter months turn warm and stormy or cold and snowy. The researchers found a time lag between variations in solar irradiance and atmospheric pressure patterns of about one to two years, which can be explained by an interaction between the atmosphere and the ocean. By comparing the two experiments with or without solar activity, they were able to prove for the first time that the sun irradiance serves as a phase-lock for the North Atlantic Oscillation. With this context, an increase of the predictability of the decadal NAO phase can be expected.
The fact that the circulation in the upper atmosphere responds significantly to the solar fluctuations, is already known, Prof. Dr. Katja Matthes, initiator and co-author of the study from GEOMAR explains. On one hand we can demonstrate with this new study how the transmission of the signal to the Earths surface and its interaction with the ocean works, and on the other hand we can show the importance of the chemical reactions for the coupling, Prof. Matthes continued. So far, most global climate models have neither a sufficient resolution in the stratosphere nor interactive chemical components. Although the solar effect on the North Atlantic Oscillation explains only a few percent of the total variance, the close relationship between solar activity and phase North Atlantic Oscillation is an important indicator to improve the predictability of climate variability, Dr. Thiéblemont summarizes.
There is still a long way to go, for successful and reliable long-term forecasts up to a decade. Nevertheless, for successful predictions it is important to include solar fluctuations, Professor Matthes concludes.
###
Scientific paper:
Thiéblemont, R., K. Matthes, N.-E. Omrani, K. Kodera and F. Hansen, 2015. Solar forcing synchronizes decadal climate variability North Atlantic. Nature Communications, doi: 10.1038/ncomms9268.
No sh!t! Who would’ve guessed.
Oh bull! The science is settled. What moron thinks that a ball in the sky you can cover with your hand impacts the climate?
Reader’s Digest version: The sun controls the climate.
Well Get it to blink in sequence.
The ONLY scientific statement I can come up with for this is “no $h!t, Sherlockl”
Thats just crazy talk. AlGore controls the climate. Wherever he speaks on GW, a blizzard hits or record low temps occur ;)
NO WAY!
Neither estimation looks good there in the middle.
That’s a big DUH...
fyi
Wow!
Who would have guessed that sunlight affects our temperatures on earth? Even Al Gore didn’t know that, and he’s a Nobel Prize winner.
Is that that unshielded nuclear furnace thingy in the sky?
At any rate she asked me about global warming. Whenever the subject comes up, all three of my very lib sisters mention the myth of 97% of all scientist believing in anthropogenic global warming.
I told her the 97% study was fraudulent. Maybe only a little better than 50% of all scientists who study climate believe in AGW and less believe it is a huge problem. She quickly dismissed the globe-bull warming talk and went on to another subject.
Global Warming Skeptics Question Authority
Princeton Professor Denies Global Warming Theory
31,000 Scientists Rejecting Global Warming Theory to be Named Monday
German scientists reject man-made global warming
Real Scientist Uncover Serious Flaw In Global Warming Data
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]
Consensus On Man-Made Global Warming Collapses in 2008
Global Warming Petition Project
31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs
[[Oh bull! The science is settled. What moron thinks that a ball in the sky you can cover with your hand impacts the climate?]]
Lol-
Or “Who thinks a ball In the sky that disappears when you close your eyes could possibly be responsible for climate change’
HATER!!! Don’t you laugh at my settled science! Go ahead and up your hand up See? The sun is gone.
You take your had away and it’s back. Now if Barack took the sun way permanently what would you do then? Because he can you know. And he should because it impacts black people disproportionately.
Black Suns matter!
Freaking right wing loons...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.