Posted on 02/24/2021 10:24:41 AM PST by Red Badger
Piedmont Glacier in north-east Greenland (Coen Hofstede/Alfred Wegener Institute)
=============================================================
It should be simple. When temperatures on Earth get hotter, huge amounts of water ice trapped in giant glaciers begin to thaw, releasing water into the oceans, and causing sea levels to rise. It's the story of our lives.
By contrast, when global temperatures plummet, which happens during ice ages, sea levels proceed to drop, as water content retreats from the ocean, freezing once more in huge inland ice sheets.
This epic, ongoing cycle of ice ebb and flow – the transitions from glacials to interglacials – has been occurring since time immemorial. But there's a problem.
For years now, scientists tracking these cycles have suggested there's a "missing ice" problem: a mysterious discrepancy between very low sea levels roughly 20,000 years ago, and the volume of ice stored in glaciers at the same time.
Ice surface elevation, 20,000 years ago. (Evan Gowan/Alfred Wegener Institute)
=============================================================
At its heart, the problem is this. During the peak of Earth's last ice age – the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which ended approximately 20,000 years ago – sea level is thought to have been about 130 metres (427 ft) lower than it is today, based on ancient coral sediment evidence.
But modelling suggests ice volume in glaciers at this point in time wasn't great enough to explain such a low sea level. So how can we explain this 'missing' ice?
In a new study led by geophysicist Evan Gowan from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany, researchers appear to have found a solution.
With a new reconstruction called PaleoMIST 1.0, the researchers were able to model the evolution of global ice sheets way into the past, much farther back than even the LGM.
"It looks like we've found a new way to reconstruct the past as far back as 80,000 years," Gowan says.
The results of the model suggest the anomaly in our data isn't a case of missing ice, but rather mistaken inferences about how low the sea level actually fell during the LGM.
According to PaleoMIST 1.0's ice physics model, the sea level dropped no more than 116 metres below where the waves lap today, with ice volume (being fully accounted for) clocking in somewhere around 42.2 × 106 km3.
"We, therefore, find no basis for the missing ice problem, as our LGM reconstruction is compatible with existing sea-level constraints," the researchers explain in their study.
According to the team, the misdirection of the missing ice argument stems from a couple of factors – firstly, over-reliance on far-field indicators (coral sediment evidence from locations elsewhere in the world), which may not accurately represent global average sea levels as we once thought they did.
Another issue is a long-established but seemingly flawed method used to estimate glacier masses, oxygen isotope ratio cycles – which appears to produce discrepancies when reconciling sea-level height and glacier masses as far back as the LGM, at least.
"The isotope model has been used widely for years to determine the volume of ice in glaciers up to many millions of years before our time," says one of the team, geophysicist Paolo Stocchi from the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research.
"Our work now raises doubts about the reliability of this method."
While the missing ice mystery appears to be solved, the researchers don't expect theirs will be the last word on this topic.
After all, their own solution's incompatibility with oxygen isotope ratio cycle-based reconstructions has, in a way, "created a new missing ice problem", the team admits.
Whether and how that new uncertainty can be resolved is a challenge for another day, in future research that may yield even clearer glimpses of ice sheet evolution in the distant past.
The findings are reported in Nature Communications.
/s
They’re talking about ice that is on land, not in the ocean. When it melts and drains into the ocean the ocean will rise proportionately.
Interesting question. Tap water is <100 ppm (dissolved salts). Fresh water is <500. The Dead Sea is ~330,000ppm. We know there are many salt flats and mines that presumably arose from evaporated seas.
Would the glaciation occur as salt precipitates out of cooling water (which would not have as high of a carrying capacity) vs. evaporation. Warmer water should be able to hold more salt in solution. Hmmm..?
The missing ice could have been blasted into space when the asteroid/comet hit the icesheet and endedthe last ice age...they really are guessing, and have nothing but 19th
century theories to base any studies on.
they still haven’t explained what caused all those woolly mammoths to die instantly with food in their mouths...
Any model that excluded iced sweet tea is faulty.
Well, they didn’t say what I thought they might.
With the ice so thick it pushed down the continental plates beneath the ice and that would likewise cause other areas to rise.
With the ice gone the land slowly rebounds in one place and sinks in another.
If as may be the case at the end of the last ice age a large amount of ice was suddenly vaporized from impacts it might not have bern initially gradual, with many earthquakes everywhere.
Or their cousins, the corduroy mammoths!
Helen Thomas......................
[we can’t account for the ice] != [the ice is missing]
They evolved into a quadruped called Nauga.
Unfortunately they were hunted to extinction for their unique hyde.
Gaah! Eye bleach stat!
Rich Corinthian leather!
Most of it is inside the hollow Earth.
That’s why more Nazi flying saucers can’t fit in there.
That's only true for melting *sea* ice, since it's already part of the ocean. Melting glaciers and land-bound ice sheets are another matter.
That was too easy ... sheesh)
Hi.
In the fwiw department, like land, there will be no more water created or destroyed that wasn’t here from the beginning.
5.56mm
All matter was here from the beginning.
That’s one reason Time Travel will be nigh impossible....................
The erf has been such a topsy turvy place with so much going on just since the breakup of Pangea, if in fact it ever happened, it makes every finding just a theory, an interpretation of the evidence.
The geologic evidence is similar to taking the bones from every animal sans flesh, putting them in a massive blender than tasking someone who has never seen any of the animals to sort the bones and tell us what animals were thrown into the blender.
Just about any answer is the equivalent of 10,000 monkeys with typewriters recreating Shakespeare.
I say this and I am an analytical engineer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.