Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watch: AI analysis says US Moon landing images are fake (Google AI)
UMMID ^ | 11/27/2023 | Staff

Posted on 11/29/2023 9:21:10 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski

Neither the United States nor its space agency NASA have so far commented on the AI analysis that questioned the Moon Landing by the American astronauts.

[Google AI anslysis found that the U.S. Moon photos are fake, but thought images captured by Chines lunar rover are fine.]

Moscow: The analysis of some of the photos and images of the U.S. astronauts landing on the Moon using neural networks showed they are fake, Vladimir Putin was told at “Artificial Intelligence World Tour" in Moscow, and the Russian President found it interesting.

The video of the analysis result and conversation of the Russian President with the Data Research Department of Sberbank, Nikolai Gerasimhen, at the Moscow AI event is now viral.

“It (neural networks) thinks almost everything in this photo is fake”, Gerasimhen is heard explaining to Putin in the video shared by the Russian news agency, Sputnik, which is now being widely shared on different social media platforms.

At the same time the AI analysis did not find any fault with the photos captured by Chinese lunar rover.

“Meanwhile it (the AI analysis) raises no particular questions about this photo taken by a Chinese lunar rover”, Putin is told.

China's unmanned lunar mission named Chang’e is a series of lunar probes launched by the China National Space Administration starting with the launch of Chang’e 1 in October 2007.

“It believes this one is fake?” Putin is seen in the video first touching the wing of his nose and then asking after a brief pause while pointing at the Apollo 11 images displayed on a screen.

“Yes. Look this is red", Putin was told.

Sberbank President German Gref who is seen accompanying Putin in the video then said, "This is what Google’s neural network thinks, not our analysis…”

(Excerpt) Read more at ummid.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; History; Science
KEYWORDS: agitprop; apollo; culturalvandelism; freepathonkiller; garbage; lookwhohatesamerica; moon; nasa; ntsa; nutjobs; putin; qlown; qtardclown; russia; tinfoiltime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last
To: Diana in Wisconsin

Thanks for first laugh of the day. Love that.


81 posted on 11/29/2023 10:33:19 AM PST by Veto! (FJB Sucks Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Anyone with a powerful enough earthbound telescope could look up at the moon through it and see the descent stages of the six LEMs, three rovers and the footprints of those 12 astronauts scattered around the American flags they planted and saluted. What’s not to believe?


82 posted on 11/29/2023 10:35:14 AM PST by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH(gasp)A


83 posted on 11/29/2023 10:36:40 AM PST by Bethaneidh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Oh, by the way.

My in-laws lived directly across the street from Shuttle Commander Rick Husband (in Amarillo, TX) of STS-107. My wife knew the family when she was growing up. Rick was younger than she was.

That was the Shuttle that broke up on reentry killing all aboard.

This is stuff is real, not as seen on TV.


84 posted on 11/29/2023 10:37:44 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Well, we landed and took off from the moon without a superstructure - and did it all with computers no where near as powerful as ann iphone. What’s to doubt?


85 posted on 11/29/2023 10:38:01 AM PST by GOPJ (...President of the United States is a...controlled asset of the Chinese Communist Party. Sam Faddis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Where is the cat?


86 posted on 11/29/2023 10:38:12 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

ALSO, the film used back then-even the expensive modified cameras that the astronauts used, were not nearly as sensitive as today’s digital cameras. We are spoiled today by just how good modern cameras are.


87 posted on 11/29/2023 10:38:16 AM PST by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JPG

I was there for every second of the space program and followed it all in amazement.

+1


88 posted on 11/29/2023 10:39:45 AM PST by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Absolutely Agree.

Einstein-

Computers are incredibly fast, accurate and stupid; humans are incredibly slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond imagination.

89 posted on 11/29/2023 10:41:26 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: roving

So you believe that all of the current space flights, and the International Space Station are all fakes?


90 posted on 11/29/2023 10:42:19 AM PST by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
Yes. And remember, the SR71 Blackbird was built in the 1960’s.

The original Blackbird was designated the A-12 and made its first flight on April 30, 1962.

https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured-documents/emancipation-proclamation

91 posted on 11/29/2023 10:45:15 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

Nixon Bump!


92 posted on 11/29/2023 10:46:30 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: telescope115

It isn’t well known by the public, but the early planning was for 100+ Saturn V launches. That’s why they built multiple launch pads, and the largest building in the world, the two-bay VAB. They could crank out Saturn Vs in assembly line fashion, one on the launch pad, another 2 being prepared.

They also envisioned a manned Mars landing in 1985-1987, during the favorable window. What our “leaders” simply threw away is difficult to fathom sometimes. It’s only gotten worse.


94 posted on 11/29/2023 10:47:10 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo

49 replies to find what I was looking for.


95 posted on 11/29/2023 10:47:55 AM PST by doorgunner69 (When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Anyone with a powerful enough earthbound telescope could look up at the moon through it and see the descent stages of the six LEMs, three rovers and the footprints of those 12 astronauts scattered around the American flags they planted and saluted. What’s not to believe?

No. No they can’t. There is a satellite orbiting the Moon called
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter that HAS taken those pictures.

The Hubble Space Telescope can’t even get those pictures.


96 posted on 11/29/2023 10:49:05 AM PST by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

It they used Kodak cameras you might have a point.

They used modified Hasselblad Contex cameras for the lunar surface, as well as 16mm film cameras, and video feed.


97 posted on 11/29/2023 10:50:07 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; cgbg
One of those tech-oriented TV shows did an interesting segment on the moon landing, and they concluded that the landing was real based on a key piece of evidence: the studio A/V equipment of that era was so primitive that it would have been more difficult to credibly STAGE a moon landing than to actually carry out the mission for real.

This is one of my favorite YouTube videos from a filmmaker on precisely this angle. Lots of great information delivered in under 15 minutes.

98 posted on 11/29/2023 10:51:29 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (There is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo

Yeah. As if NASA would have even used those utter shyt Kodak cameras.... The worst in the world at that time.


99 posted on 11/29/2023 10:53:32 AM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

It would’ve been neat to have “2001: A Space Odyssey” tech in 2001.

Instead we’re stuck with HAL9000….


100 posted on 11/29/2023 10:55:37 AM PST by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson