Posted on 12/02/2023 8:29:40 PM PST by george76
A bug? Or, a feature?
Perhaps it’s working precisely the way it was designed.
The 20% number comes from ONE batch of Pfizer vaccine injected into 711 persons.
Then, something called V1 (Vaccinator Name) vaccinated 246 people, and 60 of them died, which was 25%.
And, the statistician who worked out all the numbers is using an alias!
Just walk away folks...
The headline is fearsome fear-porn.
It erroneously extrapolates the 4 batches to the entire nation.
But free speech allows this kind of irresponsible talk and stupidity. (Not me! The article quote.)
population of new zealand is ~5.2m people.
if 20% has died in the passed 2 years, that would mean ~1.4m dead.
is there any way to confirm or reject the 20% figure?
if a govt whistleblower was coming forward, maybe the official population numbers are part of the deception.
1. "Whistleblower: 20% of New Zealand’s Vaxxed Population Have Died."
This statement is referring to the percentage of deaths of the number of people who were vaxxed.
2. "A New Zealand government whistleblower has come forward with explosive official data that shows more than 20% of the nation’s citizens have now died after receiving their Covid mRNA shots."
This statement makes the reader conclude that 20% of the nation's citizens have died after receiving the vaxx.
So let's say that someone worded American deaths as: 20% of American citizens have died after receiving the vaxx. That would mean all citizens received the vaxx, and 70 million died. It should be worded that 20% of all American citizens who were vaxxed have died.
Either way it was worded with reference to New Zealand, that 20% figure is hard to believe.
Assuming a 70% vax rate, that’s about 3.5 million people. Multiply that by 20% and you have about 700,000 people. Thats going to be noticeable by anybody living in New Zealand. It isnt a credible number, unless we are talking about a specific batcb that only a few received.
Utter steaming BS.
Does "batch nunmber one" represent the very first vaccines given?
My recollection is that in the U.S. the first batches were reserved for the very elderly; that is, those over 75. I wasn't eligible to receive the earliest available injections.
I will leave it to somebody else to calculate what the survival rate of a random population of people OVER 75 would be after a couple or three years. A 25% death rate might just be actuarially expected.
bttt
A class action suit against big pharma and big government is in order.
Blatant malfeasance and disregard for human life.
The emotional idiocy here on FR to jump to immediate conclusions is palpable.
This is an example of people making emotional decisions based upon how they “feel” and then searching for facts to support the decisions already made. This creates an irrational mob mentality.
Did you ever hear of digging deeper into the facts?
Although highly exagerated and sensationalized as click bait in the headlines, the results of this study are still worth examining.
Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
Do you remember how the government stopped Joe McCarthy in his attack on communism? By feeding bad information supporting his cause to discredit him. It’s a common ploy. Don’t fall for it. Verify, verify, verify.
A good decision maker gathers facts, examines all of them, and then makes a decision. They then continue to look at the new facts and revise their decision accordingly, being careful not to own the decision results as an individual identity and fight to protect their ego as though they needed to prove their favorite football team was the best.
What sticks in my mind are:
The 75 years thing,
An FDA approval cycle taking months rather than the normal multiple-years process,
CDC's redefinition of what a 'vaccine' really is,
CDC doesn't mention 'herd immunity' anymore like they used to,
and, the US Government paying hospitals X amount for hospitalizations where they 'diagnosed' Covid.
Maybe Pfizer, et al., used NZ as their testbed for Covid Vax. .
Thanks. Interesting. It isn’t hard to imagine some batches being contaminated or an injector at one site being bad at her job and injecting this crap into blood vessels.
It’s shown in irrefutable detail here by New Zealand’s leading government statistician.
https://www.aussie17.com/p/new-zealand-government-data-administrator
Hopefully this statistician in NZ goes further and compares the number of deaths to background rates of various causes of deaths.
Characterising the background incidence rates of adverse events of special interest for covid-19 vaccines in eight countries: multinational network cohort study | The BMJ
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n...
Largest, Most Extensive Study Of Adverse Events Background Rates Can Inform COVID Vaccines Safety Monitoring Efforts
https://www.dbmi.columbia.edu/aesi-ba...
U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Adverse events following COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia - PMC
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.