Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Backlash Against The New Yorker Backlash
The Stiletto Blog ^ | July 18, 2008 | The Stiletto

Posted on 07/18/2008 10:50:31 AM PDT by theothercheek

The MSM brain freeze caused by that infamous New Yorker cover cartoon has finally thawed and the humorless prigs who are in the tank for Barack Obama realized that it doesn’t look good when journalists denounce other journalists for exercising their free speech rights. The Obama campaign also belatedly realized its reaction to the broad satire was “really dumb damage control,” writes Andrew Malcolm of the Los Angeles Times:

It was a huge PR mistake by a campaign that doesn't make many. The denunciations by both presidential campaigns accomplished one thing: They pushed a simple cartoon to the top of most-searched terms online and the top of the news lists of countless online sites, commentators, cable news shows, commentators and network TV newscasts for more than two days. No doubt it also helped the bottom line, boosting New Yorker single-copy sales this week. …

But as a result of the campaign-induced uproar, that image has now been reproduced and received countless millions more voter impressions than the magazine itself could ever dream of. It's been viewed hundreds of thousands of times already just on this blog. And, by the way, what was the Obama campaign doing calling the magazine, trying to get an apology, or intimidate someone?

Instead of worrying that the cartoon included “every detail that the Obama campaign would like the world not to think about or associate with its guy,” as Malcolm puts it, Obama should have worried that his thin-skinned reaction will reinforce the uneasiness some voters feel that he isn’t tough enough to be Commander-in-Chief. And the punditocracy should have worried that their dissing “average” Americans as being too unsophisticated to understand that the cartoon was a send-up can only solidify the perception other voters have that Obama is an arugula-munching elitist who does not understand the concerns of workaday folk.

No doubt there is some percentage of the electorate for whom the New Yorker cartoon is a portrait not a spoof, but if Obama doesn’t “close the sale” with those who still need to be convinced to vote for him it will be because they think he is an snobby wuss.

Note: The Stiletto writes about politics and other stuff at The Stiletto Blog, chosen an Official Honoree in the Political Blogs category by the judges of the 12th Annual Webby Awards (the Oscars of the online universe) along with CNN Political Ticker, Swampland (Time magazine) and The Caucus (The New York Times).


TOPICS: Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2008election; barackobama; greatliar; islam; islamicbarak; newyorker; obamamuslim; satire; thestiletto; thestilettoblog

1 posted on 07/18/2008 10:50:31 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

The New Yorker is not my choice of mags to read......
BUT..I support the New Yorkers right to be as obnoxious as they wish...free speech


2 posted on 07/18/2008 11:06:06 AM PDT by Thinkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Excellent!


3 posted on 07/18/2008 11:24:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
I love it. Typical Liberal Understanding of Humor = None, Nada, Zip, Zero.

Liberals take themselves too seriously; Liberalism is a disease. They are dis=NOT AT EASE with them selves. They do not know how to tell a joke or how to take a joke. They are UNfunny.

It's amazing that Americans can even BE Liberals and Democrats. Americans have a great sense of humor. How anyone can espouse to the Democrat Party or to Liberalism is a scientific anomaly.

4 posted on 07/18/2008 11:49:11 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
I thought the "RULES" were obvious and known by EVERYONE....

No one, and I mean NO ONE--

is allowed to criticize, satirize, or say ANYTHING that can even be remotely be considered criticism of B. (whose middle name, according to McCain, may never be spoken) Obama.

Why is that so hard to understand? /s

5 posted on 07/18/2008 12:02:44 PM PDT by stockstrader (CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; SunkenCiv; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge

fyi


6 posted on 07/19/2008 8:32:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

7 posted on 07/19/2008 3:28:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson