Posted on 12/18/2008 1:39:29 PM PST by Sorry screen name in use
12/18/08 - URGENT NOTICE – False rumors are circulating – Justice Kennedy denied our Application for an Injunction to Stay Electoral Vote Count by Congress on January 8, 2009. However, our Writ of Certiorari is still pending and is now scheduled for Conference before U.S. Supreme Court on January 9, 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacrimes.com ...
A little late
Does this (conference) mean they need 4 Justices to go to a full hearing/trial?
Didn’t the elector’s meet and select Obama?
Anybody got money on SC taking up the case?
Geez, put your tin-foil hat away, willya? Spend your energy on fighting the three headed monster (Obamanancy Reid) from destroying this great country in the next 6 months instead of worrying about where Obama-lini was whelped.
It’s like mud wrestling with a pig: You get us all dirty and the pig (i.e. DUmmies and other Kool-Aid drinking Demo-rats) like it!
The Supreme Court is an appellate court. It does not conduct trials. If four Justices vote to hear the case, they will set a schedule for briefs to be filed and oral argument to be held. However, I expect the petition to hear the case to be denied 0-9.
I think he is referring to this recent news item:
Justice Kennedy rejects 2 more challenges to Obama
Dec. 17, 2008
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iHUQU9Oy9bW8w5a5eevJkGvFNtmAD954J4CG0
“Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has rejected two more efforts to get the court to consider whether President-elect Barack Obama is eligible to take office.
Kennedy on Wednesday denied without comment an appeal by Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania attorney, that claims Obama is either a citizen of Kenya or Indonesia and is ineligible to be president because he is not a “natural-born citizen” of the U.S. as required by the Constitution. Another appeal from California, based on Berg’s claims, also was denied.”
Sorry, ignore the anti-constitution retards.
Do you know if this is re: Berg?
Yesterday we learned Berg is scheduled for the 9th, so is this a different one?
I can’t wait until the “LOL” poster gets here.
I don’t have an opinion but that poster makes me “LOL”
Yes the conference involves all 9, and at least 4 have to vote for the issue to be heard by the court.
IMHO it will come before the full court.
All 9 see their place in history.
ping
WE may set aside the Constitution on a whim, whenever it suits our passing “need” of the moment, or we cannot, or should not. Which shall it be? If the first, then we should just scuttle the whole experiment in carefully modulated self-government.
The only way you guys can win is to get the smoking gun.
With the subpoena the State has to furnish you with a copy of the vault copy and provide the document to the court as well you can ask that your expert(s) examine the document. I think you may want an independent lab to test the document for authenticity (rate of the documents oxidation, etc. to see that it was in fact issued in August 1961) should the document indicate that Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. I don't think that the document will say that, but you never know.
The fact that Obama has simply opened up the vault for examination only leads to the conclusion that he does not have a valid Hawaiian birth certificate,but only that the birth was recorded in Hawaii.
Additionally, you should get subpoena for HHS on Barry Soetoro or all his other aliases for his student aid application. If in fact he applied for aid as a foreign student either HHS or DoS has to have the document(s). This can also be FOIA'd in a plenary action in the US Court for the District of Columbia. Additionally, DHS may have from ICE a record of his Indonesian passport's entry and exit from the US in the past. If this guy has an Indonesian Passport recorded by our government, or his entry into Pakistan on an Indonesian passport...he is, as you know, toast.
The truth is out there!
But you guys have got to either FOIA or subpoena it. It isn't currently going to magically appear in your mailbox.
However, after this Rick Warren announcement you never know what certain individuals in certain quarters will do?
Get moving with the subpoena to the Federal District Court in Hawaii, time is of the essence.
Anyway, were expecting snow and Phil probably needs a few days in the sun in Honolulu.
If one of the justices accepts to hear the case(s), it’s fair to the voting behind closed doors is at least 8-1. My guess is Thomas and Scalia are chomping at the bit, but Roberts and Alito are scaredy cats.
I really think this will at some point be before the court.
Obama having been elected, other than my natural objection to a man whose beliefs I completely object to, I support him serving his term in office. I state that with the stipulation that he is qualified to hold the office.
Obama has a number of problems here. Hawaii did allow people to acquire birth certificates having not been born in the state, just so long as they were a resident for twelve months prior to the request.
It is now open to question if the address used by the petitioners to obtain his birth certificate was legitimate. When a fraud is perpetrated on any level, the government can completely nullify the transaction, even if the end goal was a valid one.
Was Obama born in a Hawaiian hospital? Was he even born in Hawaii? Did the state of Hawaii validate his birth using a request based on residence, or on natural child birth?
These are questions I want answered. I want a full public accounting. If in the end that is provided, my objection will be reduced to one of a political rather than merit based objection.
I disagree. The Constitution is worth protecting. By being willing to look the other way to this possible theft, we’re saying the Constitution is not important and we’ve opened the door to more of the same. A precedent has been set.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.