How will he obtain the access to the original documents when no one else is allowed to do so? He is bound by the same statutes that we all are.
Now, iffen y’all think there was an investigation into criminal behavior, then a law enforcement subpoena would be possible if there can be stated sufficient grounds to believe a crime is committed.
If he can ring the bell, I’ll stop and listen.
Doesn’t a fraudulently obtained SSN indicate identity fraud? Now iffen that is the case then there is a good possibility the bc is forged/fake as well...
False SS Number. Self sworn affidavit to receive a COLB. (False swearing.)
Lying on his bar ap. Identity theft. Fraud. Illegal real estate transactions. Oh boy!
Any State Court in the nation could subpoena the original if there was a dispute in law that is within their jurisdiction.
It's technically possible for a county Sheriff to initiate such a dispute in law.
Don’t know who Alan Stang is (appears to be a Ron Paul/libertarian type), but his article has some examples of how powerful a county sheriff is, including a case that went to the Supreme Court and which Scalia commented on. If Arpaio determines that a crime has been committed, he apparently has the right to investigate.
I am not an expert on the US Constitution, however, I have read that County Sheriffs are the only LEO agency recognized and authorized by the Constitution
We got fake social security number stuff goin’. We got fishy mortage stuff goin’. We got fake Hawaii State election certification documents goin. And we have fake official birf documents goin’. We got a sheriff in a border state that is quite familar with all these crimes.
Obammy picked the wrong whitey to race bait for enforcing the law in Arizona! The usual suspect Rinos running cover with the DNC to hide Obama’s game had best not try to influence the sherrif’s investigation or they could become an obvilous player in the fraud, if there is any.
Hear that McLame? You violated our constitution by not checking and answering all the questions and you may have directly abetted Obammy in covering up his violation of the law.
What is his standing? Does he verify others for qualification? I don’t think this goes anywhere.
>How will he obtain the access to the original documents when no one else is allowed to do so? He is bound by the same statutes that we all are.
Now, iffen y’all think there was an investigation into criminal behavior, then a law enforcement subpoena would be possible if there can be stated sufficient grounds to believe a crime is committed.
If he can ring the bell, I’ll stop and listen.<
It is called the “best evidence” rule.
he can try to gather evidence through channels. If he is denied then he can go with what is available.