Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Expendables
Flopping Aces ^ | 05-07-13 | DrJohn

Posted on 05/07/2013 9:06:09 AM PDT by Starman417

benghazi ghosts

The Obama regime official story about the events that transpired on 9/11/12 continues to unravel, and despite Jay Carney's insistence that it was "a long time ago" facts keep crawling out from under the rubble of the consulate.

Testimony of those involved directly with the Benghazi disaster conflicts sharply with the position of the Obama regime.

A stand down order

The Obama regime has repeatedly denied that a stand down order was issued but the No. 2 Libya embassy official disputes it.

The deputy of slain U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens has told congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command Africa.

The account from Gregory Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama administration, which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized. Hicks gave private testimony to congressional investigators last month in advance of his upcoming appearance at a congressional hearing Wednesday.

Aid could not have gotten there in time

A special operator claims otherwise

A military special ops member who watched as the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi unfolded last September told Fox News the U.S. had highly trained forces just a few hours away, and said he and others feel the government betrayed the four men who died in the attack.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, and appearing in a Fox News Channel interview with his face and voice disguised, the special operator contradicted claims by the Obama administration and a State Department review that said there wasn’t enough time for U.S. military forces to have intervened in the Sept. 11 attack in which U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, an embassy employee and two former Navy SEALs working as private security contractors were killed.

“I know for a fact that C-110, the EUCOM CIF, was doing a training exercise in … not in the region of North Africa, but in Europe,” the operator told Fox News' Adam Housley. “And they had the ability to act and to respond.”

Hicks also believes help could have timely

In the interview, Hicks said the administration could have saved the lives of its diplomats if it had dispatched just one aircraft from nearby Souda Bay, about an hour away.

“I believe that if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split,” Hicks said. “They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.”

The hard fact is that unless the Obama regime knew about the attack and how it was going to end they could not possibly know if help would have arrived in time or not.

Clearance for an air strike?

Q: But do you think, you know, if an F-15, if the military had allowed a jet to go fly over, that it might have prevented [the second attack]?

A: Yeah, and if we had gotten clearance from the Libyan military for an American plane to fly over Libyan airspace. The Libyans that I talked to and the Libyans and other Americans who were involved in the war have told me also that Libyan revolutionaries were very cognizant of the impact that American and NATO airpower had with respect to their victory. They are under no illusions that American and NATO airpower won that war for them. And so, in my personal opinion, a fast-mover flying over Benghazi at some point, you know, as soon as possible might very well have prevented some of the bad things that happened that night.

Q : The theory being, the folks on the ground that are doing these -- committing these terrorist attacks look up, see a heavy duty airplane above, and decide to hightail it?

A: I believe that if -- I believe if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.

******

Q: I just wanted to ask, you mentioned permission from the Libyans. Why is that important? What did you mean by that?

A: Well, it's their country. And for an American military aircraft to fly over their country, we have to have permission from them to do so.

Q: So what would have been the risk of -- do you think it would have been risky for us to send someone, do you think it would have been counterproductive for us to send a fighter pilot plane over Benghazi without that permission?

A: We would have certainly wanted to obtain that permission. I believe we would have gotten it if we had asked. I believe that the Libyans were hoping that we were going to come bail them out of this mess. And, you know, they were as surprised as we were that American -- the military forces that did arrive only arrived on the evening of September 12. Yeah.

Somehow, this makes no sense to me. Obama did not seek Gaddafi's permission to bomb Gaddafi into oblivion, but Obama would need it to conduct a rescue mission?

Uh-uh.

Security assistance was requested repeatedly

A diplomatic security office lowers the boom on Hillary Clinton's State Department

Nordstrom offered some of the most pointed criticism of the security deficiencies in Libya when he testified before Issa's committee last year that State Department officials in Washington were denied repeated requests for more protection for the mission. The other two officials have not been heard from publicly before.

“The takeaway … for me and my staff, was abundantly clear — we were not going to get resources until the aftermath of an incident,” Nordstrom testified in October. “And the question that we would ask is: How thin does the ice have to get before someone falls through?”

"For me,” he said, “the Taliban is on the inside of the [State Department].”

Still another source, Mark Thompson, will testify that Hillary Clinton put her thumb on how the event was reported:

(excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 20120911; africom; alongtimeago; benghazi; c110; carney; eucom; eucomcif; expendable; gregoryhicks; libmyths; obama; soudabay; standdown; standdownorder; talibaninthebuilding

1 posted on 05/07/2013 9:06:09 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417
It was a long time ago, but the Watergate break in was earlier in 1972 than Benghazi was in 2012. Why didn't Nixon think of using the defense that "it was a long time ago"? What a great way to eliminate it as an issue.

Of course, the enemedia were not on Nixon's side, so perhaps that has something to do with it.

2 posted on 05/07/2013 9:11:45 AM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Ah, thank you, Bill, for the parsing lessons! Consider this statement:
"I ran the bureau then, and I can say now with certainty, as the former Coordinator for Counterterrorism, that this charge is simply untrue," he said. "Though I was out of the country on official travel at the time of the attack, I was in frequent contact with the Department. At no time did I feel that the Bureau was in any way being left out of deliberations that it should have been part of."
Look at that escape clause and the weasel word (emphasis added). Summed up: I had no direct knowledge but feel comfortable in calling the deputy a liar.
3 posted on 05/07/2013 9:16:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (3 guns when you only have one arm? "I just don't want to get killed for lack of shooting back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Government one day at a time...yesterday is old news, today the gov’t has fundamentally changed, tomorrow it will change again.

The new normal in Amerika!


4 posted on 05/07/2013 9:22:53 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

No one should buy the excuse that we needed permission to fly into Libya from the Libya government! That is just not true at all! Obama does not get permission for his drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen!

We don’t need permission to save American lives. That is a false argument from the State Department and one I hope gets shot down quickly in the hearing tomorrow!


5 posted on 05/07/2013 9:25:08 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

We do not need to know if a “stand down” order was ever given.

We only need to know if Obama, The President, gave the cross border authority. That’s it: Did he or didn’t he? He obviously did not.


6 posted on 05/07/2013 9:29:45 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

We are all expendable for the government nowadays.


7 posted on 05/07/2013 9:38:58 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Q. How many of the obama administration does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. None. Apparently they were all left in the dark.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


8 posted on 05/07/2013 10:22:28 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
There are two situations here. One is the need for a CBA from the President to send in forces from outside Libya. The other is what this article refers to and that is the order to stand down for forces already in Libya. No CBA was needed for that. But 0bama could have countermanded that stand down order as well.

There were forces in Tripoli that were ready to go and on their way to board a C-130. There were also forces on Sigonella ready to go as well. All in all there were enough forces geared up and ready to go, and be in Benghazi within three hours of the start of the attack, to take the whole city of Benghazi.

9 posted on 05/07/2013 10:43:04 AM PDT by TigersEye (If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Hey, I’ve been saying that this administration regarded them as expendable since a few days after the attack. What does it matter???


10 posted on 05/07/2013 2:42:16 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

“It was a long time ago.”

“What difference does it make?”

In the coming Civil War, is there any doubt whose side our Special Forces will be on?

(Hint: NOT Obama’s.)


11 posted on 05/07/2013 4:30:07 PM PDT by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson