Posted on 01/20/2016 10:15:17 AM PST by inpajamas
If he is we should elect him, if he isn’t we should elect him anyway just to piss off the libtards out there and rub their nose in Obama like a dog owner rubbing a dog’s nose in it’s pile of poop.
so what your saying, is that we don’t need no stinking laws
He is. Chester Alan Arthur settled this issue.
Rubio has a more tenuous claim if you ask me since neither of his parents were citizens at the time.
I’m fine with his eligibility, but I certainly think that some are not, and they intend to make themselves heard.
I don’t think that it benefits us as a country to leave qualification requirements nebulous.
I don’t find it helpful when I’m trying to select a candidate people saying oh if you pick that guy, I’m going to sue.
We need to get this nailed down ASAP, one way or the other.
You say you want a revolution, well you know...
Indeed they are. I’m almost at the “so what” stage myself. Not quite there, but getting close.
No,we’re tired of playing by the rules.we want to play by their rules. I hear Cruz has 14 social security numbers.
Cruz is eligible. DT playing the card to undercut him just like his silly increase ethanol junk yesterday. Even most all trumpees know this but think they might win over someone?
I don’t have to lie for my guy and I sure don’t sing his praises for his Alinsky tactics belittling all who do not kiss his butt.
Exactly my position. Once you let human garbage like Obama in, Anyone is eligible.
As long as you are willing to admit that you advocate subverting the constitution in order to seat a usurper, I’m good with it. Just don;t tell us that you are upholding the constitution.
That’s silly. I believe Cruz would be the best candidate and is the most conservative, both fiscally and morally. This issue isn’t going to go away. It would be hammered on in a general election. And fought in the courts if he won. So what happens then if he is found ineligible.....does vp elect become president....dem candidate....or does the king retain his crown? At some point we need a firm definition of NBC. I find it more troubling that the law could be interpreted as an anchor baby being eligible for president.
Was it a vaginal birth?
That's some pretty hot stuff there.
To save the Constitution we must destroy the Constitution.
Still, Cruz has a venue and a case with which to obtain an answer from the federal court system - if he wants to take advantage of the opportunity.
Anarchy! Apocalypse now! Yeah!
No. What I am saying is Nature's Law though invisible is supreme. The Constitution has been overthrown by false interpretations of judges and man-made laws and regulations of bureaucrats and politicians. We think we live under the Constitution but in truth we do not. I am saying that doing what is good and absolutely necessary is the true law regardless of what anyone else or even any state says it is.
There is no expediency justification when deliberately choosing a president.
That is a good line. Like it. But to be more precise, destroy what it has been misconstrued to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.