Skip to comments.Hillary Says Allegations Against Bill Were Different [semi-satire]
Posted on 10/13/2018 12:02:30 AM PDT by John Semmens
In an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour former First Lady Hillary Clinton explained the difference between the sexual allegations made against her husband and those made against Donald Trump.
"First of all, Bill was thoroughly investigated," she reminded. "There was forensic evidence of his semen on Monica's dress. So it wasn't just a 'he said, she said' type of case. Second, at the time many women publicly stated that they would gladly service Bill out of gratitude for his support of abortion. Third, the media didn't make a big deal out of it. They realized he was doing a bang-up job as president and were willing to grant forgiveness for his peccadilloes."
"Contrast that with Trump's situation," she went on. "There is no forensic evidence, but there are plenty of clues that have yet to be investigated. On the Access Hollywood tape we have Trump bragging about grabbing women's private parts. In the Steele dossier there is a report of Trump paying prostitutes to urinate on a hotel bed. And Stormy Daniels says the two of them had consensual sex while Trump was married to Melania."
"When you get right down to it, Trump looks pretty wimpy compared to Bill," Hillary maintained. "Bill was daring. Bill wouldn't take 'no' for an answer. I think voters respected him for that and reelected him many times as governor of Arkansas and again as president. To me, that is as clear an exoneration as a person could expect in this country. I would've gotten a similar exoneration if voters hadn't been duped by Trump. Fortunately, I did get a consolation exoneration from the FBI."
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
It may have been the first time in her life she said something that everyone agrees with. ;^)
Please .... someone wheel this poor woman off to an insane asylum.
Better put some ice on that.
Yep...Kavanaugh DID NOT have to pay Ford $800,000.
With Kavanaugh, they WERE literally “allegations”, with Bill Clinton, there were credible witnesses, and DNA evidence.
Hillaryous (Rotten Criminal) BUMP
Well she is not wrong. The accusation against Bill were true, something that cannot be said about the accusation against Judge K
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.