Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Says Building Border Wall Immoral [semi-satire]
Semi-News/Semi-Satire ^ | 6 Jan 2019 | John Semmens

Posted on 01/06/2019 10:06:29 AM PST by John Semmens

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) stood by her pledge to “not appropriate a single dollar for a border wall” contending that “building such a wall would be immoral.”

“Look, building an impermeable barrier would block the natural migration patterns of the herds of immigrants and the predators that depend upon them for their sustenance,” the Speaker said. “The more hospitable conditions on the American side benefit both the predators and their prey. The prey can qualify for numerous government payments that will enable them to support more offspring. The monetary stipends increase the rewards for predators who rob them. The increased offspring generate more children for predators to exploit and abuse. On balance, both categories of immigrants come out ahead.”

“And let’s not overlook the advantages for our country from unrestricted immigration,” Pelosi added. “The addition of millions of unskilled people who could potentially enter the labor force helps hold down the cost of labor in the United States. On the one hand, this will boost the profits of many of the billionaires who are generous donors to the Democratic Party. On the other hand, with some of the more progressive states eliminating the citizenship requirement for voting, the expansion of this natural Democratic constituency bolsters our Party’s chances for winning elections. Remember, the ‘vote harvesting’ scheme that decimated Republicans in California was carried out by immigrants that a border wall would likely have prevented from entering the country.”

if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...

https://azconservative.org/2019/01/05/pelosi-says-building-border-wall-immoral/


TOPICS: Government; Humor; Politics; Travel
KEYWORDS: democrats; illegals; openborders; satire

1 posted on 01/06/2019 10:06:29 AM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I am watching President Pence and the GOP/Democrat “negotiators” reveal the intransigence of the Democrat Congress. This is being very clearly recorded and verified.

Why?

Well when the President Declares an emergency, part of that will be that the Democrats would not fund the security of the Southern Border, The other evidence will be the statistics of illegal crossings, human trafficking, and the murders of US citizens by illegals, and drug trafficking across the country, topped by the next caravan which will be between 10K and 15K illegals.

That’s the definition of an emergency which would altogether satisfy National Emergencies Act (Pub.L. 94–412, 90 Stat. 1255.

The Dems will be sorry they ever tried to obstruct PDJT on border security. He is about to secure his second term as president. The Dems are now giving our president EXACTLY what he wants and that’s continued intransigence. PDJT is about to hand them their collective fat Democrap arses!Grin for the camera Nancy and Chuck....suckers!


2 posted on 01/06/2019 10:08:39 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

As goldstategop insightfully posted: They need 290 votes and but Dems control only 234.)

The Dems know this......and that is precisely part of the plan.

To sow confusion among the electorate....than blame all of their failures on Repubs.

All their bluster and bravado.....they are more like invaders.....an army waging war on a peaceful people.


3 posted on 01/06/2019 10:26:54 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

That was delicious, John.


4 posted on 01/06/2019 11:11:05 AM PST by kallisti (Both soliloquized alternately and imagined they were conversing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Unfortunately we can’t use Vatican City’s pope to rebut her opinion.


5 posted on 01/06/2019 11:26:52 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true; I have no proof .... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson