Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCIENCE AND “SCIENCE”: Minnesota Locked Down the State Based on a "Scientific" Model Created By Graduate Students Over a Weekend
Powerline Blog ^ | 06/30/2020 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 06/30/2020 7:17:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Science and “Science”

Politicians love to say that they are “following the science.” To hear them talk, you would think they spend hours poring over data and they go where the numbers drive them. If only.

The COVID epidemic has brought out politicians’ faux reliance on “science” in spades. As good an example as any is my state, Minnesota, where our governor, Tim Walz, has offered one tribute after another to “science” as he has driven our state off the road and into the ditch with an irrational shutdown that protected all but the vulnerable.

When Walz issued his harsh shutdown order, he attributed it to “science” in the form of an allegedly super-duper Minnesota Model that forecast doom from COVID in terms of infections, hospitalizations and deaths. It later turned out that the model was created by a couple of graduate students over a weekend, but never mind. It was “science” and it was the basis for the governor’s assumption of dictatorial control over six million lives.

When Version 1 of the model turned out to be an embarrassment, woefully wrong by every metric, it was succeeded by a less pessimistic Version 2. Version 2 then fell to Version 3, which was issued on May 13, less than seven weeks ago. Version 3 was supposedly “science” informed by experience. How did it fare? My colleague John Phelan tells the sad story:

The model also forecast, with the measures in place, a peak ICU use of 3,397 beds on June 29th – yesterday.

In fact, Minnesota Department of Health data show that there were 278 Minnesotans hospitalized with Covid-19 yesterday, just 140 of whom needed ICU care. This was down from a peak of 263 on May 30th. As Figure 2 shows, this represents another complete failure for the model.

So the model was off by a factor of 24. This might be funny, except for the vast damage that our governor has inflicted on Minnesotans in reliance on politicized “science.” A dart board would have produced a far more accurate result than the much-touted “Minnesota Model.”

A cynic might suspect that Governor Walz knows the model is ridiculous, but simply enjoys exercising dictatorial powers under his own emergency decree–a decree that apparently continues in force in perpetuity. He also knows that he has the press on his side. If a Republican governor bungled an issue as badly as Walz has bungled COVID, in reliance on a pathetic arithmetic construct that is wrong by a factor of 24 times, it would be the the scandal of the age. But every reporter in Minnesota, with one exception (not counting Scott) runs interference for Governor Walz and his brutally failed policies. Why? Because they are loyal Democrats, and they went into journalism to serve their party.

Those are the facts, and “science” has nothing to do with it. This is a Minnesota story, but the same story has been replicated in many states around the country.



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; lockdown; minnesota; minnesotamodel; models; science; timwalz

1 posted on 06/30/2020 7:17:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oregon’s model was thought up in a pot shop


2 posted on 06/30/2020 7:21:14 PM PDT by Cold Heart (Legalize Hydoxychlorquin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In late March we went into quarantine because we needed to “flatten the curve”.

Why are we still in quarantine?


3 posted on 06/30/2020 7:24:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Why are we still in quarantine?

Because liberals are using this time to completely take over the country, and no one outside of a neutered Trump (maybe Rand Paul and Tucker Carlson) gives a damn enough to lift a finger to stop them.

4 posted on 06/30/2020 7:26:46 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

RE: In late March we went into quarantine because we needed to “flatten the curve”. Why are we still in quarantine?

Flattening what curve? Deaths? Hospitalizations? Or Positive Cases?


5 posted on 06/30/2020 7:27:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hiderocker


6 posted on 06/30/2020 7:35:55 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Freedom Is In Peril! Defend it with your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Must be nice to be a graduate student masguerading as a scientist and not even follow the science or worse:

I supposed scientist, who been trusted and made up his whole report with scientific basis what so ever....


7 posted on 06/30/2020 7:46:34 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
...

8 posted on 06/30/2020 7:48:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We supposedly live in a scientific age, yet the vast majority of people live with at best an 18th century understanding of science. Even worse than that is that we fail to apply the scientific method. The CDC failed early in the pandemic to apply the scientific method in the first month of the outbreak. If they had done some random sampling early on, they could have accurately discovered the true CFR for Covid19 and thus avoided destroying the economy.


9 posted on 06/30/2020 7:48:35 PM PDT by Pres Raygun (Repent America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

I’ve been complaining about the so-called science that was being followed in MN from the get-go. I wondered immediately; why aren’t we concentrating resources on the most vulnerable first and foremost, and then working outward from there?

This whole charade was dreamt up by pseudo-scientists and foisted on us by a politician that initially appeared to be making an attempt to be reasonable, but soon thereafter turned into Jekyll’s alter ego politically.

With a willing media all to ready to believe as gospel anything coming out of a Dem’s orifices, well we get what we got and have now. This also played out in the George Floyd riots and the handling of that mess.


10 posted on 06/30/2020 8:29:43 PM PDT by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

ICU beds.


11 posted on 06/30/2020 8:48:11 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

The scientific method has been almost dumped in favor of Postmodern Science driven by numerous theories, votes thereon and consensus. Affects medicine big time.
Ruff


12 posted on 06/30/2020 9:42:19 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

[[Because liberals are using this time to completely take over the country,]]

Exactly- only liberals are allowed to now gather outside in mobs rioting burning looting, taking over the country- all other folks must shelter inplace or face the wrath of law-


13 posted on 06/30/2020 9:47:42 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Research The Great Reset.
World economic forum idea


14 posted on 07/01/2020 2:30:02 AM PDT by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“ALL models are inaccurate, though some are useful”, is an old adage I have followed throughout more than half a century of developing, using, and making decisions based on the useful ones. A key is determining which models are NOT useful, and then ignoring them.

Model “predictions” (I use the word “calculations”) are mostly irrelevant. The most important result of modelling is to give knowledgeable decision makers deeper insight into the process being modelled. It is that insight that makes decisions more accurate. This part of the process is sorely lacking with the virus modelling stories we see today in the news. Ignore them.


15 posted on 07/01/2020 4:18:57 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was also driven by Neil Ferguson’s doomer disease model. Despite the fact he had a history of doomer disease models.

From 2005
Bird flu pandemic ‘could kill 150m’
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/30/birdflu.jamessturcke

And he predicted up to 50,000 dead from mad cow disease and said beware the sheep ...


16 posted on 07/01/2020 8:09:52 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson