Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate Votes 51-48 to Proceed to Final Vote to Confirm Amy Coney Barrett on Supreme Court — Murkowski and Collins Join Democrats
GP ^ | 10/25/20 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 10/25/2020 1:32:32 PM PDT by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Enlightened1

How crucial was those 2 seats we picked up in 2018!


61 posted on 10/25/2020 2:47:54 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
How crucial was those 2 seats we picked up in 2018!

Yes. That was the "blue wave" of 2018, or so we're told. Yet the GOP increased their senate majority and shedded some RINO baggage like Jeff Flake and Paul Ryan.

62 posted on 10/25/2020 2:50:37 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Orange Man GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Bingo!


63 posted on 10/25/2020 2:53:54 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

I’m extremely skilled in that line of work, I wonder if it pays well? I’d have to give up my lifestyle though, but in this day and age, there are so many changes that nothing will be the same.


64 posted on 10/25/2020 2:55:15 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

RE: The US Senate voted 51-38

The title said 51-48

Which is it?

If 51-48, that’s just 99 senators. Who did not vote?


65 posted on 10/25/2020 2:57:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

You nailed it. There’s no peaceful solution at this point, this was known a long time ago.

Things maybe could of been rectified in the early 70s, but it’s too far gone now.


66 posted on 10/25/2020 2:57:25 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
the real vote to confirm will come tomorrow night after the thirty hours is up

What the hell is the point of these arcane, stupid rules?

If the days of horse and buggy and railroad as major transportation, maybe they made sense, but today?

67 posted on 10/25/2020 2:59:40 PM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AL)

She represents Alaska, not Alabama.


68 posted on 10/25/2020 3:01:02 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

MurCOWski is such a w!tch.


69 posted on 10/25/2020 3:03:07 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Murkowski is a bald-face liar... She said she would vote FOR this nomination... alas, she lied (nothing new).


She’s said all along that she opposes pushing any nomination through at this time. FWIW, it’s not actually a vote against Barrett. Not that I don’t expect a betrayal after.


70 posted on 10/25/2020 3:03:58 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
She will be Senator from Alaska as long as she wants to be.

Maybe. Or maybe she just needs a slid Republican opponent like Sarah Palin. I heard that Joe Whatizname who lost was a weird candidate along the lines of that Roy Moore guy who lost the Alabama special election to Doug Jones.

71 posted on 10/25/2020 3:13:30 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Yes, she won by some 2,000 votes that were contested in court. Joe Miller should be the Senator except for her name recognition, and the Democrat media and big money wanting to defeat a Sarah Palin endorsed Tea Party candidate.

Voting against a Supreme Court nominee as qualified as Amy Coney Barrett could cause her to lose the next election. I expect her to vote yes.
72 posted on 10/25/2020 3:14:08 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Deep-State Senators Lisa Murkowski (RINO-AK) and Susan Collins (RINO-ME) voted with Democrats on Sunday.

Fixed it.


73 posted on 10/25/2020 3:22:36 PM PDT by Swirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; MinuteGal

“Collins needed to because she comes from such an obtuse electorate.”

That is right. Collins comes from a very mixed district. When she voted for Kavanaugh, which was courageous, she probably knew it could cause her to lose in this 2020 election. Now she is confronted again with having to vote or not for Any Barrett. I suspect highly, as she could very well lose this time around, that she has been promised a position in gov’t if she votes for Amy and then loses her election. That’s the trade-off, her vote for Amy in return for a job if she loses her election. It’s called horse-trading. Of course if Trump loses, then all bets are off and she will have to find a new job on her own. But I’m sure some Pub donor or organization will take care of her even then.


74 posted on 10/25/2020 3:28:58 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Donald Trump, President for Life (heh, heh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

He now has full cover to do so once shes there


75 posted on 10/25/2020 3:36:46 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Isn’t Murkowski from AK? Not AL?


76 posted on 10/25/2020 3:36:52 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
roberts cannot be cpunted on as he is compromised

He could just be corrupt that would be much simpler assumption. Either way of course he is still a traitor, no matter the reason.

77 posted on 10/25/2020 3:37:31 PM PDT by itsahoot (The ability to read auto correct is necessary to read my posts understanding them is another matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Murkowski said she will vote no on the procedural votes, but on Monday she will vote yes when the nomination is voted out of the full Senate.


78 posted on 10/25/2020 3:41:10 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Someone’s got their states mixed up!


79 posted on 10/25/2020 3:47:58 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (BLM Stands For "Bidens Loot Millions"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

She didn’t vote against the nomination. She voted against moving it to the floor for a final vote. Probably an authorized CYA dissent. Let’s see what she does tomorrow before we drag her out in front of a firing squad, eh?


80 posted on 10/25/2020 4:17:25 PM PDT by calenel (Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant. Join the war effort. On the human side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson