Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Data distrust surges as Americans reject government collection efforts
The Blaze ^ | February 27, 2024 | Carol Roth

Posted on 02/28/2024 8:47:36 AM PST by Twotone

“There are three kinds of lies,” Mark Twain famously observed. “Lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

You already know that the government's published statistics are not trustworthy. Federal agencies have shifted methodologies over the years, making it hard to compare data sets.

In economic modeling, there is a concept called “GIGO” — garbage in, garbage out. And what we have been seeing does seem like a lot of garbage.

Then, the number-crunchers perform adjustments, do other kinds of syntheses, and make revisions to that data. A good case could be made that government data has been politicized, too, and some methodologies are out of date vis-à-vis the makeup of today’s economy.

But on top of all that, there’s another reason not to believe the data: Nobody wants to participate in government data collection.

A recent Bloomberg story as well as a few different charts making the rounds show that response rates to government data collection surveys have taken a nosedive. This trend has accelerated in the post-COVID-mandate era.

So when you have survey data that is questionable to begin with, and then you have a larger and larger percentage of non-responders, that further dilutes the usefulness and veracity of the data.

Why has there been an increase in the number of people who don’t want to participate in government surveys? Well, the first answer is fairly obvious: People don’t trust the government or anyone that happens to be related to the government.

Who wants the government to have more data on you, information that could be weaponized? So if survey participation is not required (as it is for some government surveys and data collection efforts), why would you spend the time to respond?

People and businesses are also more focused on privacy in general, making them more difficult to reach.

Erica Groshen, a former commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, suggested to Bloomberg News that some businesses might not want to give up data and information they regard as proprietary, as it could affect their competitive advantage.

It also suggests that when you see sharp shifts in data over a short period, part of the reason could be attributed to declining response rates. In financial and economic modeling, there is a concept called “GIGO” — garbage in, garbage out. And what we have been seeing does seem like a lot of garbage.

Data collection has become so difficult for the government that sometimes agencies offer financial “incentives” to persuade entities to participate in data collection. That effort could skew the data with specific biases as well.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has said time and again that the Fed remains data-dependent when making its policy decisions. Given the lack of quality data, however, it’s hard to believe the Fed governors are making choices armed with the very best information. If anything, they are likely to become hostage to America’s dire fiscal position over time.

Data can be useful, but it must be useful data from the get-go. Do your own research, use your eyes, head, and gut, and take official data with a grain of salt.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crime; data; distrust; government; privacy; spying; statistics; surveillance

1 posted on 02/28/2024 8:47:36 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Why has there been an increase in the number of people who don’t want to participate in government surveys? Well, the first answer is fairly obvious: People don’t trust the government or anyone that happens to be related to the government.


King Herod survey: How many boys under the age of 6 do you have in your household?


2 posted on 02/28/2024 8:51:16 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

87k new IRS agents. Blame republicans.


3 posted on 02/28/2024 8:54:33 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I once knew a woman briefly, who worked for US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. She would be having discussions with “the voices” while alternating talking to a real person. You didn’t want to interrupt “the voices”. Your government at work.


4 posted on 02/28/2024 9:07:49 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Is the Census having the same problem? They do not like it when you fill out what you feel is the Constitutional data for apportionment of the House and stop before you get to the racial, ethnic or other questions. I look forward to 2030 when they will probably add thirty new options to the sex question unlike the two answers in 2020.


5 posted on 02/28/2024 9:31:25 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Democrats' version of MAGA: Making America the Gulag Archipelago. Now with "Formal Deprogramming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I have fun with those, adding random answers.

As for the Sex question, I choose “Other” and fill the box in with “Thursday Night. . . ;)


6 posted on 02/28/2024 9:53:49 AM PST by Salgak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

The 2030 decennial Census is going to be difficult.


7 posted on 02/28/2024 4:01:58 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The 2030 decennial Census is going to be difficult.


8 posted on 02/28/2024 4:02:44 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This is how they lie about the economy. We are in a recession but they changed the definition to say we aren’t.

Orwellian


9 posted on 02/28/2024 4:04:33 PM PST by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

10 posted on 02/29/2024 6:09:58 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson