[ExGeeEye]

Example:

1. All law and regulation on the subject of tobacco advertising, either prohibiting or requiring certain content, is repealed.

2. Tobacco companies are advised they may expose themselves to civil liability if they make claims of health benefits or reduced health hazard in the use of their product, but will not be prohibited from doing so.

Another example:

1. All law and regulation affecting a citizen's ability to manufacture, own, and carry firearms and ammunition is repealed.

2. Any attempt to regulate or obstruct a citizen's ability to manufacture, own, and carry firearms is prohibited. On conviction, a person so attempting shall suffer forfeiture of all property, real and personal, all assets, businesses, business licenses, and any other thing except his/her physical freedom and two changes of clothing.*

3a. Private property rights include the right to bar those carrying firearms from entering privately-owned buildings, whether commercial or residential.

3b. Private owners are advised that in so doing, they take full responsibility for the safety of the guests they choose to disarm.

*Those of you who are familiar with my proposed illegal immigration law will find this penalty familiar. I kind of like it.

[wastedyears]

I like your second example.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

As the left pushes HARD from the left, if you are in the center, you are pushed left. The "center" doesn't push either direction and the right seems somehow afraid to push ... result is simple physics ... things move left. So we should push hard from the right. I think there should be a law that ALL citizens MUST carry firearms. Radical? No, actually that's constitutional, that we are regulated NOT to do this is UNconstitutional. So we need some "RADICAL" pushing from the right, then let them negotiate that ... maybe we'll veer right of center.

We need a bill stating that every citizen MUST have a firearm and ammunition. Interesting, why does that approach seem extreme rather than the norm? Lets propose it and watch them scream! :-) If this would happen and they would "negotiate" maybe we'd wind up with "center-constitutional".

[Erik Latranyi]

All federal laws must be re-debated and re-authorized every 20 years. Bundling laws together for re-authorization is prohibited.

[goseminoles]

Sounds like you are in school online. DQ of the week?

[Erik Latranyi]

Offset budget.

The federal goverment cannot spend more than it received in the previous year.

Deficits and borrowing are illegal unless a supermajority approved the same.

[Mister Da]

I would repeal all laws/regulations that regard CO2 to be a pollutant. Environmental agencies should consider CO2 to be a naturally occurring gas necessary & beneficial for life on the planet, & will refrain from regulating it in the future.

[anniegetyourgun]

Zero-based budgeting & flat tax based solely on requirements arising from the budget.