Posted on 05/05/2017 8:52:56 PM PDT by Beowulf9
Yes. Besides it would be ridiculous for an undrling to have a term longer than his boss, or that the bos could not either fire for cause or ask for their resignation.
Lock H->! & Huma up, but not in the same cell...
I don’t know what’s up with the pearl clutches on FR.
It’s not like they’re not posting anonymously. If there was a time to prove they have gonads, you’d think they would at least say something manly and courageous when the opportunity arises.
But nooo, they can’t even seize the opportunity to talk tough. If you don’t at least have the hueavos to bluster, there won’t be any real action, any frontal assault ever against the bastards who would control what we eat and even which pot we piss in or at least how many gallons per flush we’re allowed.
Personally, I think the globalists are having a lot of fun stomping their jackboots on our necks. And that goes for their little, sniveling bootlicking RINOS, too.
Ja, everybody is a “specisl” agent.
Special....
Yup, more melodrama and sensationalism. These stories are meaningless until we start see arrests, trials, and orange jump suits behind steel bars.
Nope. Issa, Gowdy, Chaffetz, et al are entertaining to watch, but these hearings and investigations always dead end.
Ed
Yet they are Zombies, soaking up funding forevermore.
Go Trump. Drain the Swamp!
It doesn’t matter. Nothing will be done to them.
I'm hoping they're investigating how and why he came to the decision that Hillary's and Huma's mishandling of classified info wasn't an indictable offense.
[“FBI Found New Email Suggesting Lynch Made Sure Clinton Email Probe ‘Didn’t Go Too Far’”]
coughTarmacMeetingcoughLorettaLynchcoughBillClintoncoughArizonacoughObamComplicitcoughHillaryStallingcough
Doesn’t matter if it was before or after, IMHO (not that you said it mattered). Gonna check your link out.
[Comey said he was unable to answer Grassley’s question “because it would call for a classified response.”]
Meaning Barack Hussein Obama and Susan Rice have to be involved somehow. Or at least it seems. Which is a Captain Obvious, of course.
I believe it based on Grassley’s exchange with Comey and Catherine Herridge’s report. The NYT even reported it.
The real question is will any of the culprits be held accountable. Obama, Lynch, Comey, Clinton, Mills, Abedin, Sullivan, Weiner, Pagliano, e.g. al., should stand trial for their crimes.
I'd bet he's saving it as negotiating power for a future deal.
In practical terms he is not.
There is no statutory restriction on a president who wishes to fire an FBI Director. The president is quite entitled to do so, and of course should their be wrong doing by an FBI Director that a president still wanted to keep then the Congress can elect to impeach that director, in spite of his favor with a president.
It’s a popular question. Just googling “can the FBI ..” and see what happens. Google finished my inquiry for me. LOL!
“... be fired”.
Clinton fired William Sessions, but Sessions refused to resign. Janet Reno, acting as AG for the president is the one who actually fired him.
It’s easy to find answers on Google when you get scolded for wondering what everyone in the nation is wondering. ha.
I do wonder just why it is Trump keeps him on, unless he wants to see if Congress impeaches him in a bipartisan action?
I was wondering if Trump prefers Congress impeach Comey, since both sides are mad at him, after all. It’s possibly the only thing the two parties can come together long enough to agree on.
Comey is a dignified man. I believe if it gets much hotter, he will decide to resign on his own.
This topic is just part of the swirling mist of the overall situation where the progressives are desperately trying to keep the embers of their Russian hacking fire from going out, and clearly the Trump faction are pondering whether to go after the high and mighty for the crimes that many suspect they have committed.
If that happens, the situation will be a full-blown crisis but perhaps this is the only way out of the half-century cultural civil war that has slowly turned into a two-nation impasse. The truth shall set us free.
The Russian fables have very little life in them, basically it’s like saying that Putin doesn’t want globalism to overcome the concept of national sovereignty, and the more aggressively this “problem” is pursued, the more obvious it is whose problem it really is (the uniparty’s problem).
But globalists could be just jerks who operate within the law. That has not been the case, we have globalists who are also criminals. So that will need to come out in a full legal process. I can see that Trump is hesitant to go full-bore after the top suspects, but eventually, he will find that it’s either that, or suffer the death of a thousand cuts as the globalists, untouched, keep up their drum beat.
They are more or less daring the administration to come after them. The phrase “too big to fail” comes to mind, some must think they are too big to face the law. But that is not the foundation of the republic. That essential truth needs to be revisited soon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.