Skip to comments.To find aliens, we must think of life as we donít know it
Posted on 09/21/2017 4:33:12 PM PDT by LibWhacker
From blob-like jellyfish to rock-like lichens, our planet teems with such diversity of life that it is difficult to recognise some organisms as even being alive. That complexity hints at the challenge of searching for life as we dont know it the alien biology that might have taken hold on other planets, where conditions could be unlike anything weve seen before. The Universe is a really big place. Chances are, if we can imagine it, its probably out there on a planet somewhere, said Morgan Cable, an astrochemist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. The question is, will we be able to find it?
For decades, astronomers have come at that question by confining their search to organisms broadly similar to the ones here. In 1976, NASAs Viking landers examined soil samples on Mars, and tried to animate them using the kind of organic nutrients that Earth microbes like, with inconclusive results. Later this year, the European Space Agencys ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter will begin scoping out methane in the Martian atmosphere, which could be produced by Earth-like bacterial life. NASAs Mars 2020 rover will likewise scan for carbon-based compounds from possible past or present Mars organisms.
But the environment on Mars isnt much like that on Earth, and the exoplanets that astronomers are finding around other stars are stranger still many of them quite unlike anything in our solar system. For that reason, its important to broaden the search for life. We need to open our minds to genuinely alien kinds of biological, chemical, geological and physical processes. Everybody looks for biosignatures, but theyre meaningless because we dont have any other examples of biology, said the chemist Lee Cronin at the University of Glasgow.
To open our minds, we need to go back to basics and consider the fundamental conditions that are necessary for life. First, it needs some form of energy, such as from volcanic hot springs or hydrothermal vents. That would seem to rule out any planets or moons lacking a strong source of internal heat. Life also needs protection from space radiation, such as an atmospheric ozone layer. Many newly discovered Earth-size worlds, including ones around TRAPPIST-1 and Proxima Centauri, orbit red dwarf stars whose powerful flares could strip away a planets atmosphere. Studies by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), set to launch next year, will reveal whether we should rule out these worlds, too.
Finally, everything we know about life indicates that it requires some kind of liquid solvent in which chemical interactions can lead to self-replicating molecules. Water is exceptionally effective in that regard. It facilitates making and breaking chemical bonds, assembling proteins or other structural molecules, and for an actual organism feeding and getting rid of waste. Thats why planetary scientists currently focus on the habitable zone around stars, the locations where a world could have the right temperature for liquid water on its surface.
These constraints still leave a bewildering range of possibilities. Perhaps other liquids could take the place of water. Or a less exotic possibility: maybe biology could arise in the buried ocean on an ice-covered alien world. Such a setting could offer energy, protection and liquid water, yet provide almost no outward sign of life, making it tough to detect. For planets around other stars, we simply do not know enough yet to say what is (or is not) happening there. Its difficult to imagine that we could definitively find life on an exoplanet, conceded Jonathan Lunine, a planetary scientist at Cornell University. But the outer solar system is accessible to us.
The search for exotic life therefore must begin close to home. The moons of Saturn and Jupiter offer a test case of whether biology could exist without an atmosphere. Jupiters Europa and Saturns Enceladus both have inner oceans and internal heat sources. Enceladus spews huge geysers of water vapour from its south pole; Europa appears to puff off occasional plumes as well. Future space missions could fly through the plumes and study them for possible biochemicals. NASAs proposed Europa lander, which could launch in about a decade, could seek out possible microbe-laced ocean water that seeped up or snowed back down onto the surface.
Meanwhile, another Saturn moon, Titan, could tell us whether life can arise without liquid water. Titan is dotted with lakes of methane and ethane, filled by a seasonal hydrocarbon rain. Lunine and his colleagues have speculated that life could arise in this frigid setting. Several well-formulated (but as-yet unfunded) concepts exist for a lander that could investigate Titans methane lakes, looking for microbial life.
For the motley bunch of exoplanets that have no analog in our solar system, however, scientists have to rely on laboratory experiments and sheer imagination. Were still looking for the basic physical and chemical requirements that we think life needs, but were trying to keep the net as broad as possible, Cable said. Exoplanet researchers such as Sara Seager at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Victoria Meadows at the University of Washington are modelling disparate types of possible planetary atmospheres and the kinds of chemical signatures that life might imprint onto them.
Now the onus is on NASA and other space agencies to design instruments capable of detecting as many signs of life as possible. Most current telescopes access only a limited range of wavelengths. If you think of the spectrum like a set of venetian blinds, there are only a few slats removed. Thats not a very good way to get at the composition, Lunine said. In response, astronomers led by Seager and Scott Gaudi of the Ohio State University have proposed the Habitable Exoplanet Imaging Mission (HabEx) for NASA in the 2030s or 2040s. It would scan exoplanets over a wide range of optical and near-infrared wavelengths for signs of oxygen and water vapour.
Casting a wide search for ET wont be easy and it wont be cheap, but it will surely be transformative. Even if astrobiologists find nothing, that knowledge will tell us how special life is here on Earth. And any kind of success will be Earth-shattering. Finding terrestrial-style bacteria on Mars would tell us were not alone. Finding methane-swimming organisms on Titan would tell us, even more profoundly, that ours is not the only way to make life. Either way, we Earthlings will never look at the cosmos the same way again.
Too many people with too much time on their hands and income and or wealth and or taxpayer funding to spend that idle time on useless endeavors.
The chances are 50/50 that “alien” life will “find us” before we find them, so spend our “space” time on matters of empirical science that will be productive and useful to physically exploring space, and leave the “life on other planets” question open to being addressed BY SPACE EXPLORATION, period.
NASA took a shot at trying to start life on Mars?
Now there’s a good idea.
If this world comes to an end, it won’t be because of someone wearing a three piece suit or a uniform.
It will be because of some knot head in a lab coat going,
“I wonder what will happen if we try this?”
It gets tricky. I was told, on this forum and by a Freeper, that trees are conscious life.
We are them, they are us.
They walk amoung us yet you don’t see them.
Or as a famous man once said, “in my Fathers house are many mansions”
They didn’t try to “start” life on Mars, but animate any dormant or hibernating life that might have been present. What do you perceive might be dangerous in doing that?
Then their brains could be run like quantum computers.
Or what about intelligent beings with molten metal running through their veins. That would be gee whiz bang cool.
Once we develop superluminal flight, which I'm sure we'll have in a few decades, then we can explore all of these fantastical possibilities.
Or maybe we could spend the money here on Earth trying to figure out why what little intelligent life there is seems to be going extinct.
Do not awaken the sleepers!
Never heard of ‘em, but should have. I lived in the area where Alice in Chains erupted and I was a fan of Pearl Jam.
I’ll have to look them up.
I'm not sure what living rocks you may have seen on the totally fictional series Star Trek, but modern scientists might actually be led to consider such things because of actual scientific evidence. They are NOT being "unoriginal" and somehow stealing a wacky idea from science fiction. To believe otherwise is like believing Wilbur and Orville Wright were "unoriginal" and stole the idea of flight from Icarius.
Great series with Phillip Glenister.
Sleeper is one of my favorite Woody Allen movies.
“Chances are, if we can imagine it, its probably out there on a planet somewhere, said Morgan Cable, an astrochemist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. “
If you want information about biology its always best to ask a chemist.
I disagree. If 99% of all planets with life only have microbial life on them, why would you think microbes have the same chance of finding us as we have of finding them?
Secondly, it'll be far better, not to mention cheaper, if we can detect and study those life forms with fancy new telescopes, etc., than addressing the issue by putting men in veeeeeery expensive starships and sending them to the stars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.