Skip to comments.Ronald Reagan, Speech at Moscow State University
Posted on 12/31/2017 10:38:56 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
During a visit to the Soviet Union in 1988, President Ronald Reagan, a lifelong anti-communist, met with students at Moscow State University and delivered a stirring plea for democracy and individual rights...As he addressed the students, the president stood underneath a bust of Lenin, the leader of the Russian Revolution, and in front of a mural filled with revolutionary flags of revolution.
Before I left Washington, I received many heartfelt letters and telegrams asking me to carry here a simple message - perhaps, but also some of the most important business of this summit - it is a message of peace and goodwill and hope for a growing friendship and closeness between our two peoples.
First I want to take a little time to talk to you much as I would to any group of university students in the United States. I want to talk not just of the realities of today, but of the possibilities of tomorrow.
You know, one of the first contacts between your country and mine took place between Russian and American explorers. The Americans were members of Cook's last voyage on an expedition searching for an Arctic passage; on the island of Unalaska, they came upon the Russians, who took them in, and together, with the native inhabitants, held a prayer service on the ice.
The explorers of the modern era are the entrepreneurs, men with vision, with the courage to take risks and faith enough to brave the unknown. These entrepreneurs and their small enterprises are responsible for almost all the economic growth in the United States. They are the prime movers of the technological revolution. In fact, one of the largest personal computer firms in the United states was started by two college students, no older than you, in the garage behind their home.
Some people, even in my own country, look at the riot of experiment that is the free market and see only waste. What of all the entrepreneurs that fail? Well, many do, particularly the successful ones. Often several times. And if you ask them the secret of their success, they'll tell you, it's all that they learned in their struggles along the way - yes, it's what they learned from failing. Like an athlete in competition, or a scholar in pursuit of the truth, experience is the greatest teacher.
We are seeing the power of economic freedom spreading around the world - places such as the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan have vaulted into the technological era, barely pausing in the industrial age along the way. Low-tax agricultural policies in the sub-continent mean that in some years India is now a net exporter of food. Perhaps most exciting are the winds of change that are blowing over the People's republic of China, where one-quarter of the world's population is now getting its first taste of economic freedom.
At the same time, the growth of democracy has become one of the most powerful political movements of our age. In Latin America in the 1970's, only a third of the population lived under democratic government. Today over 90 percent does. In the Philippines, in the Republic of Korea, free, contested, democratic elections are the order of the day. Throughout the world, free markets are the model for growth. Democracy is the standard by which governments are measured.
We Americans make no secret of our belief in freedom. In fact, it's something of a national pastime. Every four years the American people choose a new president, and 1988 is one of those years. At one point there were 13 major candidates running in the two major parties, not to mention all the others, including the Socialist and Libertarian candidates - all trying to get my job.
About 1,000 local television stations, 8,500 radio stations, and 1,700 daily newspapers, each one an independent, private enterprise, fiercely independent of the government, report on the candidates, grill them in interviews, and bring them together for debates. In the end, the people vote - they decide who will be the next president.
But freedom doesn't begin or end with elections. Go to any American town, to take just an example, and you'll see dozens of synagogues and mosques - and you'll see families of every conceivable nationality, worshipping together.
Go into any schoolroom, and there you will see children being taught the Declaration of Independence, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights - among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - that no government can justly deny - the guarantees in their Constitution for freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion.
Go into any courtroom and there will preside an independent judge, beholden to no government power. There every defendant has the right to a trial by a jury of his peers, usually 12 men and women - common citizens, they are the ones, the only ones, who weigh the evidence and decide on guilt or innocence. In that court, the accused is innocent until proven guilty, and the word of a policeman, or any official, has no greater legal standing than the word of the accused.
Go to any university campus, and there you'll find an open, sometimes heated discussion of the problems in American society and what can be done to correct them. Turn on the television, and you'll see the legislature conducting the business of government right there before the camera, debating and voting on the legislation that will become the law of the land. March in any demonstrations, and there are many of them - the people's right of assembly is guaranteed in the Constitution and protected by the police.
But freedom is more even than this: Freedom is the right to question, and change the established way of doing things. It is the continuing revolution of the marketplace. It is the understanding that allows us to recognize shortcomings and seek solutions. It is the right to put forth an idea, scoffed at by the experts, and watch it catch fire among the people. It is the right to stick - to dream - to follow your dream, or stick to your conscience, even if you're the only one in a sea of doubters.
Freedom is the recognition that no single person, no single authority of government has a monopoly on the truth, but that every individual life is infinitely precious, that every one of us put on this world has been put there for a reason and has something to offer.
America is a nation made up of hundreds of nationalities. Our ties to you are more than ones of good feeling; they're ties of kinship. In America, you'll find Russians, Armenians, Ukrainians, peoples from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. They come from every part of this vast continent, from every continent, to live in harmony, seeking a place where each cultural heritage is respected, each is valued for its diverse strengths and beauties and the richness it brings to our lives.
Recently, a few individuals and families have been allowed to visit relatives in the West. We can only hope that it won't be long before all are allowed to do so, and Ukrainian-Americans, Baltic-Americans, Armenian-Americans, can freely visit their homelands, just as this Irish-American visits his.
Freedom, it has been said, makes people selfish and materialistic, but Americans are one of the most religious peoples on Earth. Because they know that liberty, just as life itself, is not earned, but a gift from God, they seek to share that gift with the world. "Reason and experience," said George Washington, in his farewell address, "both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. And it is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government."
Democracy is less a system of government than it is a system to keep government limited, unintrusive: A system of constraints on power to keep politics and government secondary to the important things in life, the true sources of value found only in family and faith.
I have often said, nations do not distrust each other because they are armed; they are armed because they distrust each other. If this globe is to live in peace and prosper, if it is to embrace all the possibilities of the technological revolution, then nations must renounce, once and for all, the right to an expansionist foreign policy. Peace between nations must be an enduring goal - not a tactical stage in a continuing conflict.
I've been told that there's a popular song in your country - perhaps you know it - whose evocative refrain asks the question, "Do the Russians want a war?" In answer it says, "Go ask that silence lingering in the air, above the birch and poplar there; beneath those trees the soldiers lie. Go ask my mother, ask my wife; then you will have to ask no more, 'Do the Russians want a war?'"
But what of your one-time allies? What of those who embraced you on the Elbe? What if we were to ask the watery graves of the Pacific, or the European battlefields where America's fallen were buried far from home? What if we were to ask their mothers, sisters, and sons, do Americans want war? Ask us, too, and you'll find the same answer, the same longing in every heart. People do not make wars, governments do - and no mother would ever willingly sacrifice her sons for territorial gain, for economic advantage, for ideology. A people free to choose will always choose peace.
Americans seek always to make friends of old antagonists. After a colonial revolution with Britain we have cemented for all ages the ties of kinship between our nations. After a terrible civil war between North and South, we healed our wounds and found true unity as a nation. We fought two world wars in my lifetime against Germany and one with Japan, but now the Federal Republic of Germany and Japan are two of our closest allies and friends.
Some people point to the trade disputes between us as a sign of strain, but they're the frictions of all families, and the family of free nations is a big and vital and sometimes boisterous one. I can tell you that nothing would please my heart more than in my lifetime to see American and Soviet diplomats grappling with the problem of trade disputes between America and a growing, exuberant, exporting Soviet Union that had opened up to economic freedom and growth.
Is this just a dream? Perhaps. But it is a dream that is our responsibility to have come true.
Your generation is living in one of the most exciting, hopeful times in Soviet history. It is a time when the first breath of freedom stirs the air and the heart beats to the accelerated rhythm of hope, when the accumulated spiritual energies of a long silence yearn to break free.
We do not know what the conclusion of this journey will be, but we're hopeful that the promise of reform will be fulfilled. In this Moscow spring, this May 1988, we may be allowed that hope - that freedom, like the fresh green sapling planted over Tolstoi's grave, will blossom forth at least in the rich fertile soil of your people and culture. We may be allowed to hope that the marvelous sound of a new openness will keep rising through, ringing through, leading to a new world of reconciliation, friendship, and peace.
Thank you all very much and da blagoslovit vas gospod! God bless you.
Cold War Flashback *Ping*
I do miss his vision for how to be a better America.
Too bad Bushes and Clinton brought different message.
I realized the speech above is abridged...this was the part that struck me upon my initial read, but from the American Rhetoric database. Here, Reagan extols religious faith in America and had help from his advisor on Russian culture, Suzanne Massey with citing some powerful quotes from Russia’s most cherished writers regarding freedom:
“Freedom, it has been said, makes people selfish and materialistic, but Americans are one of the most religious peoples on Earth. Because they know that liberty, just as life itself, is not earned but a gift from God, they seek to share that gift with the world. “Reason and experience,” said George Washington in his farewell address, “both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. And it is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government.” Democracy is less a system of government than it is a system to keep government limited, unintrusive; a system of constraints on power to keep politics and government secondary to the important things in life, the true sources of value found only in family and faith.
But I hope you know I go on about these things not simply to extol the virtues of my own country but to speak to the true greatness of the heart and soul of your land. Who, after all, needs to tell the land of Dostoyevsky about the quest for truth, the home of Kandinsky and Scriabin about imagination, the rich and noble culture of the Uzbek man of letters Alisher Navoi about beauty and heart? The great culture of your diverse land speaks with a glowing passion to all humanity.
Let me cite one of the most eloquent contemporary passages on human freedom. It comes, not from the literature of America, but from this country, from one of the greatest writers of the 20th century, Boris Pasternak, in the novel “Dr. Zhivago.” He writes: “I think that if the beast who sleeps in man could be held down by threats — any kind of threat, whether of jail or of retribution after death — then the highest emblem of humanity would be the lion tamer in the circus with his whip, not the prophet who sacrificed himself. But this is just the point — what has for centuries raised man above the beast is not the cudgel, but an inward music — the irresistible power of unarmed truth.”
Reagan is still a highly respected figure in Russia. Russians respect that he stood up for them during the dark days of Communism, even if the post-Communist reality has been somewhat of a disappointment for Russians.
From my experience people seem pretty neutral and it is en vogue to dislike Gorbachev.
However: please see the quote on post 6. Unfortunately wasn’t included in prior transcript. I think this was the highlight of the speech.
That is. Reagan and FDR are two most admired US leaders in Russia for different reasons.
Obama and Clinton are least popular.
Eloquent, positive, full of hope, highly motivating.
It would be interesting to know how much the vision of the students hearing this speech was changed.
Reagan was one in a lifetime.
What a great speech...
A scholar in pursuit of truth... Theres a nifty idea. Wow.
Independent of government, yes - but not independent of each other. We have a single, associated press.
Show me a Leftist or Statist entity in which the Individuals accept Truth as an inner standard for critical thinking.
How about the Democrat Party?
The ACLU, NAACP, SPLC, CORE, BLM, Occupy (Fill in blank)
The American Mainstream Media?
Any part of American Government subsidized educational system?
American Hollywood Motion Picture Elite?
The biggest part of American Music, Stage and Literary communities?
How about even the GOP Elite and FBI cops?
NO, we live in the Era of the Ninth Commandment, the modern Western Reality is Entirely based upon the False Witness Lie, the Uniparty Deep Swamp rules with the lie, and they use Useless Idiot "Democracy" to accomplish that rule.
While Reagan was a GREAT Man, he was also tricked more than once by the Leftist Liars.
Democracy is not the solution, it is the moral and ethical value of Men themselves as Reagan noted.
They're not even independent of Government NOW!
That speech was in 1988.
Navy Patriot, you may be right...Reagan instinctually and internally knew why the Cold War would turn out in our favor but:
Even he did not make the narrative clear enough for America and the world. Hence why Soviet/Marxist values already taking hold of the West became entrenched.
And also why (even though I think these people are overly demonized) - the American reformers who sought to rebuild post-Soviet Russia with a secular Harvard-guided market-based economic model FAILED miserably.
They had zero clue on the massive, depths-defying grip the Soviet vision had on people’s souls!
I spoke to a Russian man from Odessa who came to the U.S. in the late 70s: said it took him TEN whole years to adjust to life here, even after learning English. He had to detox from all the lies, all the habits of cheating, deceit, and bribery he engaged in for survival of life under oppression - all the perceptions of his Soviet imagination ingrained in him since birth. It was collective brainwashing on an unprecedented level in human history!
(Now you can see why the post-Soviet space has struggled so much to find its footing!) And why North Korea is such a mess.
Communism is an atheist vision of the world fundamentally at odds with the reality of God and His jurisdiction over the universe. It is literally attempting on a heaven on earth without Him - and ends up creating hell instead. This is why it failed and fails and fails time and time again.
And too many Americans don’t realize how our precious free institutions are inseparable from the reality of God, from whom all fundamental laws of nature and rights of man (as His image bearer) find their origin.
“Endowed by our Creator...”
I believe, Trump — his speechwriter Stephen Miller — they have a clearer narrative about why the world looks like the way it does today and how crucial it is that America stand firm and own our place in the narrative as beacon of freedom.
Loved the “Western civilization must survive” speech Trump gave in Warsaw, Poland last spring especially.
There are no mature or senior native Russian citizens alive who did not experience this relentless absolute totalitarian Marxism.
Their reaction is entirely human, to learn how to survive and adapt what you cannot change.
That Russians did so actually speaks more to their strength than their flaws.
The Western economic effort to "rescue" Russians from Communism after the Fall of the Soviet Union was not genuine or earnest.
In fact, it was a Western Elitist attempt to secure a favorable position in ownership and control of Russian and Eastern European assets and natural resources using purchased favorable treatment from Yeltsin.
These are the same entities that attack Russia now, and demonize Russians and Russian leaders that stand up to Western exploitation as a bunch Godless Commies.
Individual Russians, and the Nation, have and will relearn how to negotiate a non Marxist, partially free market competitive system at different rates, with seniors probably the slowest (Pensioned and less involved with the workforce).
But they will learn how to be competitive with the rest of the world. Remember, the Russians now have had about Seventeen years to catch up to what America has had about 200 years to experiment with.
Russia has been out of Politically Correct Marxism since about 1995, while America and Western Europe have installed Politically Correct Marxism to the point of Tyranny staring in about 1955.
The last thing Russians need is "Help" from the West, because it is not Help, it is Socialist Tyranny and Serfdom.
Russians not only have to learn to negotiate a more Free Market, they have to learn tho watch out for themselves as individuals and Russian Nationals, and learn self sufficiency, too, while detecting and disregarding the Fake News Western Media, including some of their own.
Can they? They certainly have the smarts and the chops.
Will they? God knows.
I think you also underestimate the resilience of the West, our capacity to live up to our values.
Regardless as is true anywhere but especially after something as traumatic as the Soviet Union: Russia needs genuine spiritual revival. I am not talking about the external trappings of Orthodoxy and lip service to political incorrectness.
Here is Russia’s entry this year into the foreign language category for the Golden Globes. Almost 100 countries made submissions and Russia’s made it to the shortlist!
“Loveless” directed Andrey Zvyagintsev
In Loveless, a Broken Family and a Lost Nation.
“” “” “” Regardless as is true anywhere but especially after something as traumatic as the Soviet Union: Russia needs genuine spiritual revival. I am not talking about the external trappings of Orthodoxy and lip service to political incorrectness.
Here is Russias entry this year into the foreign language category for the Golden Globes. Almost 100 countries made submissions and Russias made it to the shortlist!
Loveless directed Andrey Zvyagintsev””” “”
That is what ‘oppressive tyranny’ like Russia does. /s
I mean exposing her ills putting it into an art form to submit for international awards entry.
Isn’t it a start in a right direction following your own logic?
As for a movie itself the problem it is telling about is not new and you can’t blame it on a ‘regime’.
Russian family is screwed up to some degree I agree but the problem is the combination of WWII and decades of socialism which did to it practically the same that the Democrats did to a black family since the Great Society.
The important point is it changes. In earlier 2000s there were up to 90 divorces per 100 marriages in Russia and now about 50.
Single motherhood is in a similar decline as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.