Posted on 05/18/2018 8:07:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Interesting claim. Can you prove it?
You know, I am a Christian and Bible believer.
And I am sick and tired of people like the author of this idiotic piece making us all look foolish by denying scientific facts instead of trying to reconcile those facts with scripture.
You know, I am a Christian and Bible believer.
And I am sick and tired of people like the author of this idiotic piece making us all look foolish by denying scientific facts instead of trying to reconcile those facts with scripture.
****************************************************
Ditto. But I do think folks such as the author mean well.
Which scientific facts is the author denying? Evolution is silent on how sexual reproduction was introduced into biological life. Every mammal, insect, avain, amphibian, and aquatic life form relies upon two distinct sexes to survive. Every one of these types had to have descended from one, as of yet, unidentified species that separated into two sexes. Nothing short of creation can answer this.
Perhaps you could provide answers to the questions posed in this “idiotic piece”. The amount of magical thinking required to believe the evolution myth exponentially exceeds that required to believe in an all powerful Creator.
You claim to be a Bible believing Christian, yet deny the power of God, preferring to believe the logically impossible myth of evolution.
'Scientific facts'... the gods of the modern era ... look what they claim about man made climate change... Have you read what God said about the 'climate'? These gods of science can only 'study' that which they can see ... the flesh body, and it returns to the dirt from which it came ... the soul/spirit intellect is what makes the flesh body alive, and it returns back to the Sender when the flesh dies. Surely, you do not 'believe' souls and their spirit intellect evolve?
Like post #7, I, too, am interested in hearing how you think sexual reproduction cold develop by natural selection.
These people have no imagination. What they should be looking at is how sexual reproduction is almost impossible to evolve out once it has appeared. It never goes back the other way.
Interesting when one demands “proof” when their own claims and assertions also have no proof! Evolution as now taught is devoid of proof... it consist solely of various speculations, antidotes and at its root bold proclamations. Evolution can’t prove how the first cell emerged, how DNA happened or how the origin of the sexes occurred. We just know it did!
One of the #RustyIronies in the current “debate” is the evolutionist will admit they don’t know how life began... but with certitude and arrogance, declare how it didn’t... an Intelligent Creator. If it were science, its adherents would not go apoplectic when questioned… then demand opposing views be silenced! That ain’t science, its dogma and ideology.
The third problem is the one I always point out and nobody has ever offered a satisfactory answer to it. It’s really the fatal flaw of the entire hypothesis.
The first two at least could speculatively have a solution, for example if you theorized that the earliest species already had the capability for both sexual and asexual reproduction, and some descendants lost one ability, while other descendants lost another. That explanation might work, but it would demand a radical reworking of the “evolutionary tree”.
I’m so excited about this subject!
“Evolution can’t prove how the first cell emerged, how DNA happened or how the origin of the sexes occurred. We just know it did!”
“Proof” to an evolutionist means stating the conclusion you desire first, then finding a way to make a semantic argument that appears to show a possible way that conclusion might be true, while ignoring any arguments that might show it to be false.
[[You claim to be a Bible believing Christian, yet deny the power of God,]]
Exactly- a god like that is an impotent god- not an Omnipotent God- and a god like that is also a liar because God said in His word He created man and woman- but if evolution occurred, then the word of God is a lie
I certainly don’t serve a lying impotent god who somehow managed to give nature miraculous supernatural abilities to ‘create’
“’Proof’ to an evolutionist means stating the conclusion you desire first, then finding a way to make a semantic argument that appears to show a possible way that conclusion might be true, while ignoring any arguments that might show it to be false.”
__________________________________________________________
Ya nailed it Boogieman! They do same with Global Warming (Climate Change on cold days).
[[“Proof” to an evolutionist means stating the conclusion you desire first, then finding a way to make a semantic argument that appears to show a possible way that conclusion might be true, while ignoring any arguments that might show it to be false.]]
Well put- worth repeating because that is exactly what happens- I might add that they also attack the character of anyone who puts up possible counterarguments to their hypothesis- calling them unscientific/ psuedoscientists- and all manner of derogatory names- For many- this amounts to ‘scientific debate’
“Natural selection OBVIOUSLY MUST HAVE “selected” from genderless asexual replication the DNA information necessary for evolving the very first male and female forms necessary for sexual reproduction.”
Can you prove THAT?
I’m borrowing what you said to put in my profile so that i don’t forget how you worded it- I’ll of course give you the credit- my scatter brain has trouble remembering things- hoep you don’t mind? If you do, I won’t put it in there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.