Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mueller report will be 'devastating' for the president: Frequent Trump defender
CBS ^ | 11/26/2018 | CBS

Posted on 11/26/2018 7:12:16 AM PST by mikelets456

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: patriotspride

“...every time I see one of these fools on tv...”

One should also visualize the self-important, entitled fools who voted for them.

IMHO


61 posted on 11/26/2018 8:34:30 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

So devastating that nothing has occurred in two years.....


62 posted on 11/26/2018 8:36:18 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Would not be shocked if Trump were to be working on a counterreport that is devastating to Mueller.


63 posted on 11/26/2018 8:40:06 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Define devastating Alan.

True story from high school. Vocabulary word was 'devastate'. Define the word and use it in a sentence.

Chett, not the brightest bulb in the drawer, a real rocket surgeon: Devasate: to lay waste. My cat devastated on the carpet.
64 posted on 11/26/2018 8:42:02 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Dershowitz was one who went to rape island that bill clinton went to. Pedophile island. The democrats probably reminded him.


65 posted on 11/26/2018 8:45:16 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Implications of AD’s comments:

1) President Trump has maintained that the SC investigation is a political witch hunt. For the SC’s report to present “politically devastating” opinions about Trump, but no evidence of crime by Trump, is to prove Trump was correct. He is likely to point this out.

2) The Special Counsel statute requires that the appointment be made for pursuit of specific crimes. If there were no crimes other than Manafort’s loan and tax games from years ago and process violations arising from the investigation itself, the appointment was illegal (since the process crimes didn’t exist before the appointment). The things Mueller has charged Russians with doing have nothing to do with the Trump campaign.

3) SC’s Report = “Al Capone’s Vault”. The more hype, the harder the fall. Even Peter Strzok said “there’s no there, there”. The media will pretend, until someone asks “Where’s the Beef?”


66 posted on 11/26/2018 8:46:10 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

“When I say devastating, I mean it's going to paint a picture that's going to be politically very devastating. I still don't think it's going to make a criminal case,” Dershowitz said.

Devastating but not criminal? Clearly this reporter is out of touch with what constitutes "devastating" material. Let's educate him. #DECLAS.


67 posted on 11/26/2018 8:50:25 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
“When I say devastating, I mean it's going to paint a picture that's going to be politically very devastating. I still don't think it's going to make a criminal case,” Dershowitz said.

In other words, nothing. Two years of how many attorneys working? A devastating political report? The network nightly newscasts do this every day.

68 posted on 11/26/2018 8:51:15 AM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
Ok

My take (could be wrong of course!) is:

All they are doing is marketing the idea it will be “devastating”. This is means in reality it will be a whole lot innuendo, rumors, and maybe some highly technical breaches of obscure but not criminally liable regulations. They will desperately being trying to make forest fire smoke with burned out cold match fire. All they have left is to try to make people think its bad.

69 posted on 11/26/2018 8:59:15 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
Dershowitz knows something that we don't? I don't think so. He is speculating.
70 posted on 11/26/2018 9:20:04 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real
Maybe more Stormy Daniels stuff? Devastating at a personal level?
71 posted on 11/26/2018 9:22:25 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

If it were, it’d all be out there by now.


72 posted on 11/26/2018 9:26:35 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know. how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Yeah Dershowitless has decided that the seriousness of the fake charges is more pertinent than the facts....more ammo for Trump as they lob another dud....


73 posted on 11/26/2018 9:50:08 AM PST by trebb (Those who don't donate anything tend to be empty gasbags...no-value-added types)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

What will they do? Hate Trump even more?


74 posted on 11/26/2018 9:54:24 AM PST by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

That’s a superb graphic. Do you know who made it?


75 posted on 11/26/2018 10:00:03 AM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

“That’s a superb graphic. Do you know who made it?”

I do not.


76 posted on 11/26/2018 10:05:24 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

OK but thanks for the reply. It’s so good I want to send it around.


77 posted on 11/26/2018 10:22:26 AM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

FTA:

“Dershowitz added that he believes the report, although it will have a strong political impact, is unlikely to result in criminal charges.”

If Dersh is right, then any legal basis for impeachment is gone, destroying the whole legal basis for Mueller’s initial appointment.


78 posted on 11/26/2018 10:36:01 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

By all means, please do send it around...


79 posted on 11/26/2018 10:50:09 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Conserv

I typically listen to Mr. Dershowitz because he usually very reasonable. This sounds like one of those stick with FOX for BREAKING NEWS topics.


80 posted on 11/26/2018 11:05:26 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson