Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flynn & the U.S. v. Sullivan is going to be streamed from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals tomorrow (Friday) at 9:30 AM EST.
youtube | 6/11/2020

Posted on 06/11/2020 7:20:25 PM PDT by bitt

Flynn & the U.S. v. Sullivan (AKA In Re: Michael T. Flynn) is going to be streamed from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals tomorrow (Friday) at 9:30 AM EST.

The court is expecting a lot of interest in the case, so they’re directing people to their YouTube channel, which is here:


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Military/Veterans; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: flynn; henderson; rao; sullivan; wall; wilkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: Deaf Smith

Because the DOJ filed the motion to dismiss, so Powell withdrew Flynn’s motion to dismiss and adopted the arguments of the DOJ.

In essence, the DOJ then became the lead party in the Petition for the Writ of Mandamus. When the DOJ, after filing a amicus brief at the invitation of the COA, Sullivan then had to respond to both the U.S. Goverment and Sidney Powell. Having the DOJ as the lead party in this action increases the odds that it will be granted, so much so that the result is a slam dunk.

Powell was allowed to submit the appellant brief and also a reply brief after Sullivan submitted his answer.


21 posted on 06/11/2020 8:20:09 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Nice explanation, thank you.


22 posted on 06/11/2020 8:32:12 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Tomorrow Powell, DOJ and Wilkerson will present arguments. Sullivan won’t speak. Will the Solicitor Gen. Represent the DOJ?


23 posted on 06/11/2020 8:43:49 PM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bitt

How is any court supposed to do its work properly if political hacks turn it into a pay per view style circus?


24 posted on 06/11/2020 8:45:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of And justfact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Former Fed Prosecutor Joseph diGenova and his wife were recently talking about this case and it’s looking good for Flynn.

Joseph thinks the circuit court has decided to dismiss. All sides only have 15 minutes (!) to state their arguments (amicus folks get no time to speak). Add to the fact the superior court only gave ten days for Sullivan to respond and it could be construed that they’re not happy with the judge.

Flynn should sue...the DOJ’s dismissal brief reads like an indictment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wO0clnBbDoA

Start listening at the 24:15 mark


25 posted on 06/11/2020 8:46:11 PM PDT by Desslok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gcparent

“Will the Solicitor Gen. Represent the DOJ?”

I believe that the Asst. Solicitor General will be arguing for the DOJ.


26 posted on 06/11/2020 8:47:24 PM PDT by Batman11 ( The USA is not an ATM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gcparent; Deaf Smith

This is US vs. Sullivan because the hearing is about the duties of Judge Sullivan based on the “petition for writ of mandamus” of Flynn’s attorney asking that the DC Court of Appeals to issue an order to Sullivan to dismiss the Flynn case.

So this is the hearing in the appeals court, with a short oral presentation from each of Flynn’s counsel, government (DOJ) counsel, and Sullivan’s counsel.


27 posted on 06/11/2020 9:00:43 PM PDT by Joachim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

I do not want to be disappointed.


28 posted on 06/11/2020 9:16:17 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt; Deaf Smith; gcparent; InterceptPoint; WASCWatch; Fungi; Desslok; Batman11
The hearing is on the Michael T. Flynn Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. That Petition, at its page 34, reads:

CONCLUSION

For these reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests a Writ of Mandamus ordering the district court to (1) grant the Government's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice, (2) vacate its order appointing an amicus curiae, and (3) assign the case to another judge for any additional proceedings.

By it's ORDER of 4 Jun 2020, the D.C.Circuit court set oral arguments to start 12 Jun 2020 at 9:30 a.m; one counsel per side to argue.

Sydney Powell will argue for Petitioner Michael T. Flynn.

Beth Wilkinson will argue for Respondent Emmet G. Sullivan.

Jeffrey B. Wall to argue for Respondent USA.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

USCA Case #20-5143
Document #1845695
Filed: 06/04/2020
Page 1 of 1

United States Court of Appeals
For The District Of Columbia Circuit

____________

No. 20-5143
September Term, 2019
1:17-cr-00232-EGS-1
Filed On: June 4, 2020

In re: Michael T. Flynn,
Petitioner

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the following times are allotted for the oral argument of this case scheduled for June 12, 2020, at 9:30 A.M.:

Petitioner, Michael T. Flynn - 15 Minutes

U.S. Department of Justice - 15 Minutes

Respondent, Hon. Emmet G. Sullivan - 15 Minutes

One counsel per side to argue. The panel considering this case will consist of Circuit Judges Henderson, Wilkins, and Rao.

Form 72, which may be accessed through the link on this order, must be completed and returned to the Clerk's Office by June 8, 2020.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/
Scott H. Atchue
Deputy Clerk

The following forms and notices are available on the Court's website:

Notification to the Court from Attorney Intending to Present Argument (Form 72)


29 posted on 06/11/2020 9:18:52 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Let it be good news for a refreshing change.


30 posted on 06/11/2020 9:19:13 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodpusher
There is no case here as the DOJ has withdrawn its case. Why are we even here? Sullivan should be removed from office. This bastard thinks he is a judge and prosecutor simultaneously.
31 posted on 06/11/2020 9:44:09 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Harry Reid and Obama went to great lengths to control this court.
\No one expects a fair ruling from the DC Appelate court.


32 posted on 06/11/2020 9:51:10 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Harry Reid and Obama went to great lengths to control this court.
\No one expects a fair ruling from the DC Appelate court.


33 posted on 06/11/2020 9:51:10 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It will be audio only on Youtube, per https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/intranet/home.nsf/Content/Announcement+-+Listening+to+Oral+Argument+-+In+re+Michael+Flynn+-+June+12+2020 .
34 posted on 06/11/2020 9:52:30 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

On the contrary, this case is a slam dunk in favor of Flynn.

If you had read all the briefs, it is very clear.


35 posted on 06/11/2020 10:05:39 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GAGOP
Once the petition is filed, the trial court loses jurisdiction until the Court of Appeals makes a decision unless one of the parties ask for an en banc review, which means all of the judges on the court of appeals will weigh in on the decision of the three-judge panel. That is very unlikely to happen. I would not be surprised if 95% of the opinion is already written.
36 posted on 06/11/2020 10:10:08 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

The 9th Circuit broadcasts the video of oral arguments.


37 posted on 06/11/2020 10:11:31 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

LOL!
Would love for the DC Appeals to bow to the facts.
Have no reason to think they will.


38 posted on 06/11/2020 10:13:30 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

LOL!
Would love for the DC Appeals to bow to the facts.
Have no reason to think they will.


39 posted on 06/11/2020 10:13:31 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Sorry for the double posts.


40 posted on 06/11/2020 10:16:57 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson